boofhead

I understand what that means. It means that if I had a choice as to whether to support a******n or not I would choose not. I would choose life for the baby not death, which is surely the opposite of life.

So why do we say the opposite is Pro Choice? That is a given is it not? And if we have a choice, which is what Pro Choice means, surely, then we are free to choose the life of the baby or the death of the baby (against a******n or support a******n). In other words, Pro Choice is meaningless. Everyone is Pro Choice especially the ones who proclaim to be Pro Life (well except for Democrats who don't want anyone to have a choice on anything at all) and with regard to a******n (on demand and free) everyone has a choice and no-one is being denied that (yet).

Why not be honest and lay it out for everyone to see clearly by labeling the two positions on a******n as Pro Life and Pro Death? It would be more accurate and more enlightening surely?

If everyone chose to describe the Pro Choice people as Pro Death maybe the public would get it and maybe the public would start to use their brains and maybe the 1.4 million babies in the USA who are k**led every year by Planned Parenthood (another false name for a group that does not support parenthood but words have meaning don't they?) and a******n mills would not be so gruesomely and terribly high. Maybe we could become civilized just a little and maybe by calling a spade a spade it could be a start?

PeterS

A pro-life person doesn't care about the quality of life a child has once they are born as most are against welfare and food stamps under the impression that they breed a dependency on government that lasts for generations. So if a pro-life position that leads to a lifetime of misery can one really be called pro-life or are you really just in favor of a slow and miserable death? So before you run around attaching labels why don't you make sure that the label you attach doesn't actually belong on your own pro-death forehead...

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Oh yeah, PeterS knows all the evil in everyone else. He is the ruler supreme and ultimate arbiter ofr the entire world; him and his ilk. You're to judge the worthiness of the lives of all.

You sicken me.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Good morning Crazyzealot.

MarvinSussman

The correct statement of choice is neither "Pro-Life" nor "Pro-Death" but rather "Pro-Criminal Indictment" or "Pro-Choice". Why don't you just mind your own damn business?

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

debeda

Yes, let's call a spade a spade. A******n is NOT a "women's health care issue" as the left claims. It certainly does nothing for a woman and means certain death to the child. It's simply a way to allow people to go further and further down the rabbit hole of no consequences for any actions and NO personal responsibility. I have researched so-called "partial birth" a******ns and have seldom been so sickened to my soul that human beings could drop to such a level. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

PeterS

And the behavior of conservatives sickens me...

bylm1-Bernie

Well, Pete, as usual you are way off base. So-called pro-life advocates are against k*****g innocent human beings and also against leading them into a life of government dependence, however, they are also for helping them to grow into independent citizens by establishing family units to train them as God intended, by educating them properly so they grow to respect law and order and develop a sense of value. Avoiding possible negative consequences by k*****g them before they have a chance to develop is a very poor solution. But then liberal solutions very rarely make any sense. In the end, it comes down to pro-life or pro-death. How else could you define it?

bylm1-Bernie

Maybe you could explain that statement a bit further. Or, should I just mind my own business?

PeterS

Against k*****g innocents so that you can torture them for the rest of their lives. Like with the children who came over the border--you people delighted in separating them from their parents. That will teach them! Boy, you love teaching innocent children lessons for crimes committed by their parents!

Morgan

And it is certainly not the business of the US "government".

bylm1-Bernie

Pete, you are a prime example of someone who can't see the forest because the trees are blocking your view. I'm sure you would also be in favor of eliminating some penalties for criminals in order to reduce the crime rate. Or maybe we should just k**l them - that would stop them from committing any more crime. Your logic defies explanation.

Morgan

And you, see the forest through the trees, and are reasonable, unlike Liberals, and an example of this is by closing down planned parenthood or halting its funding? Which btw is more about prevention and is the biggest preventer of a******ns, that is reasonable to you?