https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/09/22/breaking.-kavanaugh-accusers-third-witnesse-located-testimony-game-changer?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=b7b3454dff96e4781441c5cb4a53c9f0


So far, Christine Ford, the California professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her 37 years ago, has been less than forthcoming with anything that approaches a verifiable detail of her experience. She doesn’t know what year it happened. She doesn’t know what month it happened. She doesn’t know where the house was or whose parents it belonged to. She doesn’t know how she got home. Those are huge, gaping holes in any account of anything and yet, Ford’s supporters shamelessly contend that this is a natural reaction to this simulacrum of a trauma. One bit of information she has provided, oddly enough, are the names of the other three teens in the house at the time.

Two of them are male. Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth have both provided letters, via their attorneys, to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of any party such as the one Ford describes.

There is a third witness, the young woman that accompanied her to the alleged party and who the young Christine Blasey abandoned in a house filled with drunk males who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. Now the young woman has been located. And she has provided a statement, by way of her attorney:

CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser.

On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..

“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”

The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.

Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.

“I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.

https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/1043673765157199872


So now we have three witnesses, plus Brett Kavanaugh, agreeing that this party never happened, much less the incident. And all have done so under penalty of prosecution for providing a false statement to Congress. This means the only person not on the record is Christine Ford.

End of copy of article...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wonder if this little tidbit will help drive any more left-leaners to the #WalkAway movement? It certainly should open up some eyes!

Of course, probably not the ones who love liars and are set to destroy this country!

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/09/22/breaking.-kavanaugh-accusers-third-witnesse-located-testimony-game-changer?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=b7b3454dff96e4781441c5cb4a53c9f0


So far, Christine Ford, the California professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her 37 years ago, has been less than forthcoming with anything that approaches a verifiable detail of her experience. She doesn’t know what year it happened. She doesn’t know what month it happened. She doesn’t know where the house was or whose parents it belonged to. She doesn’t know how she got home. Those are huge, gaping holes in any account of anything and yet, Ford’s supporters shamelessly contend that this is a natural reaction to this simulacrum of a trauma. One bit of information she has provided, oddly enough, are the names of the other three teens in the house at the time.

Two of them are male. Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth have both provided letters, via their attorneys, to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of any party such as the one Ford describes.

There is a third witness, the young woman that accompanied her to the alleged party and who the young Christine Blasey abandoned in a house filled with drunk males who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. Now the young woman has been located. And she has provided a statement, by way of her attorney:

CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser.

On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..

“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”

The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.

Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.

“I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.

https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/1043673765157199872


So now we have three witnesses, plus Brett Kavanaugh, agreeing that this party never happened, much less the incident. And all have done so under penalty of prosecution for providing a false statement to Congress. This means the only person not on the record is Christine Ford.

End of copy of article...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wonder if this little tidbit will help drive any more left-leaners to the #WalkAway movement? It certainly should open up some eyes!

Of course, probably not the ones who love liars and are set to destroy this country!

So were you at the party.
Or were you with Kavenaugh at all that evening?
But still you are convinced that Mr Kavenaugh is telling the t***h & that Ms Ford is not.

Well at one time I did drink alcohol too the point of not remembering all that I did.
(I gave up drinking alcohol a few years later.)

Now he may or may not have drank any alcohol that evening.
Plus we both came to a different conclusion.

Well I say that the incident will have political ramification for some time into the future.
Enough to make you displeased.

So while there is no way at this time to make criminal case.
Or has Ms. Ford so implied.

She mentioned the name of another person.
(She deservers along with the with the American public) to have that person testify as part of this investigation.)
There may be enough evidence that he may have been at times drunk to the point of blacking out his memory.

So unless all parties with any connection to Ms Ford & Mr Kavenaugh at this time & named by Ms Ford should be contacted as a witness & swear in front of the proper body.
Because of the importance of the issue.
Even though there is no criminal case. It should be addressed with the gravity of a criminal case.

So were you at the party.
Or were you with Kavenaugh at all that evening?
But still you are convinced that Mr Kavenaugh is telling the t***h & that Ms Ford is not.

Well at one time I did drink alcohol too the point of not remembering all that I did.
(I gave up drinking alcohol a few years later.)

Now he may or may not have drank any alcohol that evening.
Plus we both came to a different conclusion.

Well I say that the incident will have political ramification for some time into the future.
Enough to make you displeased.

So while there is no way at this time to make criminal case.
Or has Ms. Ford so implied.

She mentioned the name of another person.
(She deservers along with the with the American public) to have that person testify as part of this investigation.)
There may be enough evidence that he may have been at times drunk to the point of blacking out his memory.

So unless all parties with any connection to Ms Ford & Mr Kavenaugh at this time & named by Ms Ford should be contacted as a witness & swear in front of the proper body.
Because of the importance of the issue.
Even though there is no criminal case. It should be addressed with the gravity of a criminal case.

Floyd, based upon what she has said and what evidence we have from "Witnesses", Ford could be referring to any male person on the planet with the exact same accuracy. In other words, it's even possible that she is referring to you. Baseless accusations with zero merit, have no place in any arena, period.

After reading the things her students have said about her, I believe her to be Cray Cray and perfectly capable of manufacturing this for the democratic cause and I'd even bet she's getting some kind of compensation from them.

Floyd, based upon what she has said and what evidence we have from "Witnesses", Ford could be referring to any male person on the planet with the exact same accuracy. In other words, it's even possible that she is referring to you. Baseless accusations with zero merit, have no place in any arena, period.

After reading the things her students have said about her, I believe her to be Cray Cray and perfectly capable of manufacturing this for the democratic cause and I'd even bet she's getting some kind of compensation from them.

So were you at the party.
Or were you with Kavenaugh at all that evening?
But still you are convinced that Mr Kavenaugh is telling the t***h & that Ms Ford is not.

Well at one time I did drink alcohol too the point of not remembering all that I did.
(I gave up drinking alcohol a few years later.)

Now he may or may not have drank any alcohol that evening.
Plus we both came to a different conclusion.

Well I say that the incident will have political ramification for some time into the future.
Enough to make you displeased.

So while there is no way at this time to make criminal case.
Or has Ms. Ford so implied.

She mentioned the name of another person.
(She deservers along with the with the American public) to have that person testify as part of this investigation.)
There may be enough evidence that he may have been at times drunk to the point of blacking out his memory.

So unless all parties with any connection to Ms Ford & Mr Kavenaugh at this time & named by Ms Ford should be contacted as a witness & swear in front of the proper body.
Because of the importance of the issue.
Even though there is no criminal case. It should be addressed with the gravity of a criminal case.

Well said. Allow me to amplify this a bit.

Rush Limbaugh has long said that in the liberal view of criminal allegations against any political opponent, the seriousness of the charge is all that matters, evidence is irrelevant. This fallacious view of justice can of course be corroborated by many previous attempts by liberals to destroy a political opponent, and in the high profile cases, the charge always seems to be sexual abuse. How often, for example, do we catch the OPP libs d**gging president Trump's past indiscretions onto the stage as some sort of proof beyond reasonable doubt that he is unfit to lead the nation?

If the seriousness of Blasey Ford's charge against Kavanaugh is all it takes to derail his confirmation, if this nefarious political gambit succeeds in this case, our system of justice will finally be wrecked and it will set a precedent with which anyone, anywhere, at anytime can be convicted based solely on the charge against them. This is totalitarian justice, every tyrant in history applies it. If you speak out against the party in power, you commit a capital crime.

Judge Kavanaugh is a constitutionalist, an originalist in the mold of Justice Scalia. His judicial record is clear, and in a liberal love fest on MSLSD recently, "Spittles" Matthews asked Kamala Harris what she thought would result from confirming Kavanaugh to the SCOTUS bench. She said that putting an ideologue on the supreme court would destroy our constitution. This is a clear example of who progressives really are and how they think.

Well said. Allow me to amplify this a bit.

Rush Limbaugh has long said that in the liberal view of criminal allegations against any political opponent, the seriousness of the charge is all that matters, evidence is irrelevant. This fallacious view of justice can of course be corroborated by many previous attempts by liberals to destroy a political opponent, and in the high profile cases, the charge always seems to be sexual abuse. How often, for example, do we catch the OPP libs d**gging president Trump's past indiscretions onto the stage as some sort of proof beyond reasonable doubt that he is unfit to lead the nation?

If the seriousness of Blasey Ford's charge against Kavanaugh is all it takes to derail his confirmation, if this nefarious political gambit succeeds in this case, our system of justice will finally be wrecked and it will set a precedent with which anyone, anywhere, at anytime can be convicted based solely on the charge against them. This is totalitarian justice, every tyrant in history applies it. If you speak out against the party in power, you commit a capital crime.

Judge Kavanaugh is a constitutionalist, an originalist in the mold of Justice Scalia. His judicial record is clear, and in a liberal love fest on MSLSD recently, "Spittles" Matthews asked Kamala Harris what she thought would result from confirming Kavanaugh to the SCOTUS bench. She said that putting an ideologue on the supreme court would destroy our constitution. This is a clear example of who progressives really are and how they think.