Trump Better Be Very Careful With Rosenstein, There Is A Term Called Pre Decisional Discussion, Anything Goes
Sep 21, 2018 20:59:05 #
The constitution allows for a president to be removed under article 25...so there has to be discussions about it that are perfectly okay as well...
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
Sep 21, 2018 21:15:23 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
woodguru wrote:
The constitution allows for a president to be removed under article 25...so there has to be discussions about it that are perfectly okay as well...
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
That's bulldungs**t!
Sep 21, 2018 21:34:43 #
woodguru wrote:
The constitution allows for a president to be removed under article 25...so there has to be discussions about it that are perfectly okay as well...
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
>>>>
Naaaaahhhhh,
FIRE At WILL !
Fire Roseprick !
Game OVER Pal... he’s going down... he will submit his resignation
Sep 21, 2018 21:38:02 #
woodguru wrote:
The constitution allows for a president to be removed under article 25...so there has to be discussions about it that are perfectly okay as well...
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
I want you to learn about what conditions have to be met in order to invoke the 25th; then tell me just how difficult it would be to remove a president -- a lot more than your personal opinion.You call the president a moron but he runs the show and accomplishes his stated goals in spite of obstructions as well as the most vindictive attacks that could be brought forth by these c****e t*****rs.I find it interesting you have had the man convicted and in jail every time these i***ts and t*****rs make an accusation and twist everything out of proportion.It makes me wonder who the moron really is.
Sep 21, 2018 21:40:47 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Naaaaahhhhh,
FIRE At WILL !
Fire Roseprick !
Game OVER Pal... he’s going down... he will submit his resignation
Naaaaahhhhh,
FIRE At WILL !
Fire Roseprick !
Game OVER Pal... he’s going down... he will submit his resignation
I believe that Rottenstein will be lucky to only resign. That POS is as dirty as a progressive can be.
Sep 21, 2018 21:44:50 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
vernon wrote:
I want you to learn about what conditions have to... (show quote)
The l*****ts are out of their minds with jealousy, they have no one who can compete against Donald Trump..even with underhandedness..crazy crooked Hillary proved it.
Sep 21, 2018 22:00:53 #
byronglimish wrote:
I believe that Rottenstein will be lucky to only resign. That POS is as dirty as a progressive can be.
>>>>
Most of them are dirty and they’ve surrounded Trump and IDK wtf he’s waiting for to start firing these A**holes...
They are T*****rs flat out.
Sep 21, 2018 22:08:56 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Most of them are dirty and they’ve surrounded Trump and IDK wtf he’s waiting for to start firing these A**holes...
They are T*****rs flat out.
Most of them are dirty and they’ve surrounded Trump and IDK wtf he’s waiting for to start firing these A**holes...
They are T*****rs flat out.
I just read where Trump is getting cold feet on declassifing the Russian probe documents, have you heard that?
Sep 21, 2018 22:28:43 #
byronglimish wrote:
I just read where Trump is getting cold feet on declassifing the Russian probe documents, have you heard that?
>>>>
I have not heard but I did read Pelosi, with 4 others in cahoots with The FBI And CIA will not do it so Trump can’t access them?
We are now in a constutional crisis with Muriny
Sep 21, 2018 22:31:33 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
I have not heard but I did read Pelosi, with 4 others in cahoots with The FBI And CIA will not do it so Trump can’t access them?
We are now in a constutional crisis with Muriny
I have not heard but I did read Pelosi, with 4 others in cahoots with The FBI And CIA will not do it so Trump can’t access them?
We are now in a constutional crisis with Muriny
We're a tinder box.
Sep 21, 2018 22:32:35 #
Sep 21, 2018 22:47:54 #
woodguru wrote:
You don't have a friggin clue what is happening now, or what has happened since the day Trump became the Republican nominee. I could give you five clues, but you just ain't smart enough to process them. You are a leftstream media pull toy.The constitution allows for a president to be removed under article 25...so there has to be discussions about it that are perfectly okay as well...
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
...so somebody has to open the discussion for people to openly debate whether it's appropriate. Who is that person, it could be anyone with the balls to do it. The whole white house was openly referring to article 25.
Careful moron, firing Rosenstein is obstruction, talk to your white house legal team and slow down.
Though it would be a monumental mistake for Trump to fire Rosenstein BEFORE the mid-term e******n, it would not be obstruction. So. Unleash your incredibly warped intellect and explain exactly what you mean by "obstruction". Obstruction of what?
FYI: There is no such thing as an Article 25. Go back to "See Spot run" and start over.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.