One of ther Ford's demands...
Kavanaugh cant be in the room and he has to go first??/So how can he defend himself if he doesnt know what is accused of???
proud republican wrote:
Kavanaugh cant be in the room and he has to go first??/So how can he defend himself if he doesnt know what is accused of???
Hopefully, the nutless members of the hearing committee won't go along with this BS.
More demands that she knows are not acceptable. The accuser always goes first. More delaying tactics.
Liberty Tree wrote:
More demands that she knows are not acceptable. The accuser always goes first. More delaying tactics.
Yes that's why in court cases they're called petitioner and respondent or plaintiff and defendant. The petitioner/plaintiff lays out their case and the respondent/defendant responds/defends. But of course in dem land they make all the rules so........
Trooper745 wrote:
Hopefully, the nutless members of the hearing committee won't go along with this BS.
Correct me if I am wrong; but regarding the demand that the FBI investigate, is this not outside their purview, and shouldn't Ford's lawyer know that?
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong; but regarding the demand that the FBI investigate, is this not outside their purview, and shouldn't Ford's lawyer know that?
L*****t bullsh!t knows no bounds.
Trooper745 wrote:
L*****t bullsh!t knows no bounds.
Neither does their ignorance. How many left wingnuts do you think realize the limitations on the FBI? It scares me that people who are totally ignorant about government, who frequently don't know who their representatives are or how they v**ed, are allowed to v**e their ignorance. It scares me even more that these people are allowed to procreate and reproduce unsupervised.
debeda wrote:
Yes that's why in court cases they're called petitioner and respondent or plaintiff and defendant. The petitioner/plaintiff lays out their case and the respondent/defendant responds/defends. But of course in dem land they make all the rules so........
Everything is backwards in the Socialists Democrats world.
old marine wrote:
Everything is backwards in the Socialists Democrats world.
Bizarroland, like the old superman comics IMO
Under the law, isn't the accused allowed to face his/her accuser? So, she should go first and he should be in the room when she testifies. If she doesn't want to be there when he testifies that's her option, but he can't possibly defend himself if he isn't in the room when she testifies.
madsciontist wrote:
Under the law, isn't the accused allowed to face his/her accuser? So, she should go first and he should be in the room when she testifies. If she doesn't want to be there when he testifies that's her option, but he can't possibly defend himself if he isn't in the room when she testifies.
perfect logic. Unfortunately we are not dealing with rational people in this matter
proud republican wrote:
Kavanaugh cant be in the room and he has to go first??/So how can he defend himself if he doesnt know what is accused of???
HA !!
Her Supporters From Congress To The Street
Say The Onus Is Only On Kav To Prove His Innocence
"The Men Need To Shut Up, And Put Up"
....Mazie K. Hirono (D) Hawaii
Him Going First Is For Her Council To Eaves-Drop
To Coach The I***t On What To Say
And No Lawyer Is To Cross-Examine Her
She'll Tag Only Democrats To Soft-Ball Her
This Is A Stalling Tactic Gambling On The Mid-Terms
If They Get 51(D) Senators
They'll Stall Until After They're All Sworn In
And The Committees Change Chair
Nothing To Do With Kavanaugh At All
It Would Have Been Any Trump Pick
The Opposition Just Needed To Know Who's Name
proud republican wrote:
Kavanaugh cant be in the room and he has to go first??/So how can he defend himself if he doesnt know what is accused of???
Such demands would never be allowed in a court of law and Congress should not allow them either. She should be willing to face the man with her accusations if she us telling the t***h. She and her story is in the public realm now, so need for fear or secrecy.
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong; but regarding the demand that the FBI investigate, is this not outside their purview, and shouldn't Ford's lawyer know that?
I question that, also. The FBI does not investigate rape cases, that is the job of the local police. If it is decided that the FIB investigates the he said/she said, no evidence case, then the confirmation would have to be put on hold. Since the democrats WANT to delay the confirmation until after the e******ns, I have wondered about this. Wonder if we will ever know the t***h of this whole political mess. And I wonder what the next catastrophe from the liberals will be. In the meantime, none of our nation's critical issues are veing dealt with.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.