[quote=TrueAmerican][quote=Airforceone]It’s all true the FBI under the direction of Trump telling Christopher Wray the director to stand down on the investigation into Kavanaugh. So Wray the head of the FBI did it for Trump because it was going to cause delays in the the Nominations. Trump was trying to jam the nomination through before the mid terms.
It’s a disgrace the way Grassley, Hatch and Trump are disrespecting women all for political gain.[/[/quote]
Do you have a problem with honesty ?
Airforceone wrote:
It’s all true the FBI under the direction of Trump telling Christopher Wray the director to stand down on the investigation into Kavanaugh. So Wray the head of the FBI did it for Trump because it was going to cause delays in the the Nominations. Trump was trying to jam the nomination through before the mid terms.
It’s a disgrace the way Grassley, Hatch and Trump are disrespecting women all for political gain.
BS, the nomination and v**e is going through very shortly.. Trump didn’t tell the FBI to stand down on anything, he doesn’t even trust them!!!
Please post your source on this allegation...
tactful
Loc: just North of the District of LMAO
tactful wrote:
This one of many links from different sites that... (
show quote)
Ummmmm.......ok.
Here's my opinion on your sources, ok?
There is a term making the media rounds out there that obviously comes from PR firm, or think tank. They are all using the exact same term that is meant to sell a narrative. I've seen this same thing over, and over, and over for years now. It looks like brainwashing tactics , or propaganda to me.
In this case, the term is "credibly accused". I read both of your links until I came to that phrase. I read the first that far, then opened the second wondering if it had the same phrase. Sure enough, it did. I stopped reading at that point.
That woman has no credibility whatsoever. She can't remember the date, time, place, and many, many other relevant details. This is a political hit job by the democrats, period.
tactful
Loc: just North of the District of LMAO
archie bunker wrote:
Ummmmm.......ok.
Here's my opinion on your sources, ok?
There is a term making the media rounds out there that obviously comes from PR firm, or think tank. They are all using the exact same term that is meant to sell a narrative. I've seen this same thing over, and over, and over for years now. It looks like brainwashing tactics , or propaganda to me.
In this case, the term is "credibly accused". I read both of your links until I came to that phrase. I read the first that far, then opened the second wondering if it had the same phrase. Sure enough, it did. I stopped reading at that point.
That woman has no credibility whatsoever. She can't remember the date, time, place, and many, many other relevant details. This is a political hit job by the democrats, period.
Ummmmm.......ok. br Here's my opinion on your so... (
show quote)
well I was thinking skeptical( being a champion skeptic) when it was first seen there on wapo,unsure about PR influence then it came through on
axios ( a fave right wing of media out there)? are you suggesting they( or all) are influenced by pr or think tanks and are propaganda arch?
I don't find the term in either yet but will look .if it's in the axios source I'd consider your take.as originally posted
everyone cannot be wrong or as you so aptly put it where there is smoke there is usually fire.
the way I'm seeing it this is NOT a left or right thing,it is an American wide spread problem just like opioids ( they don't discriminate). whereas government ( aka mind control) does.we are all in the same boat being shone that same darkness no matter what We think we know.when it comes to political correctness any and every thing is fair game(within reason).
not republican or democrat,we are Americans first and foremost that unfortunately many are shall we say not so patriotic .this includes all sources and the reason why I don't lend much credence to much these days being there is always something else to do or needs doing.it is an interesting journey our country is taking. appreciate the opinion.
while it's been reported 64/65women back this woman up,depending on the source the number 200 appears a lot.
just my .02
K
Airforceone wrote:
It’s all true the FBI under the direction of Trump telling Christopher Wray the director to stand down on the investigation into Kavanaugh. So Wray the head of the FBI did it for Trump because it was going to cause delays in the the Nominations. Trump was trying to jam the nomination through before the mid terms.
It’s a disgrace the way Grassley, Hatch and Trump are disrespecting women all for political gain.
Keep drinking the l*****t Kool-Aid! Dems didn't care about Ellison's girlfriend AND son. Where was the "respect" for her? Both Clintons and Obummer did much worse while in office and adulthood. They lied, c***ted, stole, and in some cases, caused the deaths of others. And everybody's worried about something some kids "supposedly" did while in high school?! This whole deal is a big con job by the left and the Dems.
The only thing lower than a snake.....is a Democrat.
proud republican wrote:
WTF are you talking about????...Where in the hell do you get this BS????...FBI already investigated Kavanaugh 6 times!!!1...Enough is enough!!!
When something new comes up the investigate again, it's the way it works.
Look at video of Grassley and Hatch back during the Thomas confirmation, they had no problem with the FBI checking things out then.
Just because this allegation gets closed it isn't done, there are a dozen other issues that make Kavanaugh unfit to be a supreme court justice.
snowbear37 wrote:
K
Keep drinking the l*****t Kool-Aid! Dems didn't care about Ellison's girlfriend AND son. Where was the "respect" for her? Both Clintons and Obummer did much worse while in office and adulthood. They lied, c***ted, stole, and in some cases, caused the deaths of others. And everybody's worried about something some kids "supposedly" did while in high school?! This whole deal is a big con job by the left and the Dems.
The only thing lower than a snake.....is a Democrat.
K br br Keep drinking the l*****t Kool-Aid! Dems ... (
show quote)
You've referred to things that have nothing to do with a supreme court justice, there is a different standard expected, and the GOP isn't even trying to put up a centrist judge that has an impeccable history of adhering to the law no matter what their personal beliefs are.
tactful
Loc: just North of the District of LMAO
woodguru wrote:
You've referred to things that have nothing to do with a supreme court justice, there is a different standard expected, and the GOP isn't even trying to put up a centrist judge that has an impeccable history of adhering to the law no matter what their personal beliefs are.
Could it be there is no such person or people? Impeccable that is that may adhere to such beliefs?
archie bunker wrote:
Ummmmm.......ok.
Here's my opinion on your sources, ok?
There is a term making the media rounds out there that obviously comes from PR firm, or think tank. They are all using the exact same term that is meant to sell a narrative. I've seen this same thing over, and over, and over for years now. It looks like brainwashing tactics , or propaganda to me.
In this case, the term is "credibly accused". I read both of your links until I came to that phrase. I read the first that far, then opened the second wondering if it had the same phrase. Sure enough, it did. I stopped reading at that point.
That woman has no credibility whatsoever. She can't remember the date, time, place, and many, many other relevant details. This is a political hit job by the democrats, period.
Ummmmm.......ok. br Here's my opinion on your so... (
show quote)
Exactly so, even my wife calls her a liar.....
peg w wrote:
Last night I heard that there were scores of women who had worked with Kavanaugh willing to testify against him. They had been disrespected and belittled. They were never called by the judiciary comettee.
Does anyone know if this is true or not?
Dogs and dinner you make the connections but I'm very proud, most proud of myself for standing up to a wanton God rammed dog, you contest that I invite anyone to do that, these women are dogs simple as that, I'm the living proof of it.
This is the most perverse expression of Matriarchial Society, evident since one Christian Country attacked another in Serbia, US fights
like a woman because they live in a Matriarchial Society.
Yet, “Trump celebrates winning 52 percent of women in 2016 — which is only how he did among w****s....”
Good thing that 52% v**ed for him.. As did I and I’ll do it again should He be the strongest most knowledgeable candidate!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.