One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
It's time to put the women back in their place!
Page <<first <prev 13 of 14 next>
Oct 6, 2018 11:56:57   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The FBI was only allowed to interview 10 people picked by the white house. All the people calling in with information were ignored, because the scope of the FBI investigation was so limited. The fix was in, a sham.


You might want to pace yourself moldy, this may take a while.



Reply
Oct 6, 2018 12:00:38   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:


Oh so he drank and that naturally means he’s a raist or predator and the devils triangle means the same??? Just as thhe article is a strettttccchhh so are those comments..pfttt

You should read my year book~ ha, then again, no you shouldn’t... What a flimsy excuse you have come up with here...

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 12:07:35   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Tug484 wrote:
How in the world would anyone be able to prove someone yanked on her clothes 36 YEARS ago?
She can't remember the year but she was 15. Surely she could figure that out.


Could if what she claims took place... Another evasive comment that can not be proven... Just as she wants it, or embellished upon by Feinstein and liars in consortt!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2018 12:29:54   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
padremike wrote:
Do any of you older men like myself miss the day when women were treated as ladies, cherished as wives and mothers and placed atop the metaphorical ivory tower? Who is advantaged by this war between sexes? Militant feminism teaches that unless a woman can become and do the same things as a man she has no worth or value. One has to search far and wide to find anything any more "sexist" than that sort of corrupt thinking. I do miss the days when girls were taught to be ladies and boys were taught to be gentlemen. Like the old Virginia Slim cigarette commercial touted,"You've come a long way baby....." I would add, "you may have lost more than you gained." Balance!
Do any of you older men like myself miss the day w... (show quote)


Alot of t***h in this Post Mike...

I note you use the phrase “lady” in your post.. Right again, there is a marked difference from being a women to a “lady.” My mother always said girls grow into women but few are a lady..

Militant feminism as you bring up is really, at least in my opinion, the insecurity of some women and need to compete with men just to prove they are valuable. Their insecurity comes from not recognizing that they are valuable and don’t need to compete with a man..I also believe those militant feminist have really placed a negative leeriness with men who do not trust them and not only them but all women which is what is infuriating... Not all women are like them and they appreciate the finer qualities a gentleman has to offer. Those women also recognize that they are perfectly able of proving themselves in the workforce and seeing each as an equal, not as someone being suppressed because of a man.

Like those embarrassing, ignorant, loudmouth, swearing worse than any man, displayed during those woman’s march h*****g there vagina around their neck; boy that went over well ~~talk about d********g and embarrassing... I still cringe over how they reduced a woman’s value to her vagina. I believe in equal rights, equal pay, equal respect and being treated as a lady. Like my mother said girls grow into women but not many make it to being a lady. I’m embarassed by the things going on right now... this metoo movement, and that is exactly what it is, in fact looks to take a man out of his position that they believe they belong in and they will do it anyway they can. Nothing more than jumping on the bandwagon rather than proving themselves the person they truly are or could be. They want to be independent while all the while screaming victimization. I’m glad most of the metoo moment comes from women Describing things that perhaps or possibly took place in 20 or 30 years ago...

Ford is s disaster and needs help but I doubt its because of her lies here...

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 12:33:02   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
bdamage wrote:
You might want to pace yourself moldy, this may take a while.


God one.
Should we have mercy on them?
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2018/10/6/t1-430048-protesters4.jpg

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 14:23:48   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
[quote=debeda]
lindajoy wrote:
It still is a two way street, its just that now the women who alledge these acts 20,30, or even 40 years later are empowered with the money or book deal that may come...

I’m sorry but I don’t buy it .. These people and party who look to ruin careers of others are the lowest!

On another note~~There certainly isn’t any collusion here either, right??? I’m betting Ford didn’t expect the witch, I won’t say her name, to tske tjat provate letter snd put it out there.. Still wongering why she waited so long and did no independant investigation to confirm anything... Set up? You betcha!!

This will be a disaster for Democrats but far short of a victory for Republicans. Kavanaugh will be confirmed.

With less than two days before Sen. Chuck Grassley's deadline for Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both high school students, to file her written testimony with the Senate Judiciary Committee in order to appear before them on Monday, a few things are becoming clearer, making this entire event somewhat easier to prognosticate.

First, Ford has made herself unavailable to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and is only speaking through her lawyers. She is claiming death threats. I don't deny that she's gotten them, because there's some really sick people out there. But she hasn't gotten death threats from the U.S. Senate.

Second, in a t***sparently absurd game of goalpost-moving, Ford's attorneys first demanded that the FBI launch a formal criminal investigation, then backed off to merely requiring every "witness" they've implicated to appear before the Senate. Ford's attorneys made this last demand after Sen. Grassley, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to them detailing their options, and why the FBI is not in a position to run an investigation.

Grassley invoked the Constitution and Senate procedures in his letter, stating "The Constitution assigns the Senate and only the Senate with the task of advising the President on his nominee and consenting to the nomination if the circumstances merit. We have no power to commandeer an Executive Branch agency into conducting our due diligence." The letter was a powerful signal that the White House, which is standing behind Kavanaugh, and Republicans in the Senate, are closing ranks and challenging Ford (and Sen. Dianne Feinstein) to produce evidence.

Third, Maine Sen. Susan Collins, a potential swing v**e if Democrats can break her away from Kavanaugh, said publicly that she thinks "it's not fair for Judge Kavanaugh for her not to come forward and testify." In other words, Feinstein's plan to launch the allegation and let it just hang in the air, hoping for the mob to run Kavanaugh out on a rail, has failed miserably.

Fourth, Republicans have the v**es to confirm Kavanaugh, and there's nothing Democrats can do, having expended all their wet powder. They're clearly out of ammunition.

Now there's going to be Democrats engaging in face-saving, grandstanding, and a massive press effort to dig anything (literally, anything) up to embarrass, smear or otherwise create a cloud over the head of one of the most respected jurists in America. And Kavanaugh will be confirmed.

https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/contributors/the-kavanaugh-end-game-vVTSnwccE0iDH5sN5oQA5w/?mc_cid=033172146b&mc_eid=54848c997b[/quote/]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏DAMN you're good!!!! And AGREED!
It still is a two way street, its just that now th... (show quote)


Ms. Debeda, you are wonderful to read and I love your enthusiasm and straight talk in your posts!!!! You are goooooodddd!!!
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🌺🌹

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 14:33:23   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Exactly what I was just talking about! Excellent Facts too...👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍👍

LOL, I had two older brothers watching me like a hawk, didn’t let me get away with anything, the dang brats knew the guys better than I did even some of the girls better than I did, so I listened... I had to LOL...

Something serious though Deb, women do not have to compete with men they just need to except the fact that men are men and women are women. Venus and Mars and all the things in between. They can establish themselves by the performance of their jobs and as long as they are doing the equivalent then that should be offered the equivalent. That I support very much....I hear some women still complaining about the inequity of salary ranges but that’s all they do is complain..They don’t take it to task and get their company to recognize what is taking place and fix it...Companies will take advantage as long as they can until certainly called out... Too many laws on the book they were specifically violate because no one challenges them and they know it. So if they really want e******y and equal pay then go the task and stop blaming men for the fact that they get paid more money... They sure don’t mind when they bring it home to cover the household expenses etc...



M
debeda wrote:
Some good points. I grew up with mostly boys in the neighborhood, so liked to play baseball, hockey, king of the hill, etc. BUT I also enjoyed being a girl. And when we got older I had about 8 cherished older brothers who'd even babysit for my younger siblings and do my chores ( my mom worked nights) if I had a date. I don't think girls OR boys should be precluded from doing things they enjoy, but the whole women having to act like men to be "good enough" always baffled me. Good enough for what? Though on the other hand, I got a job with the old Ma Bell and was not allowed to have the job I tested for and was hired for because I'd be "too much of a distraction to the men" (The district manager actually said those EXACT words to me). That is also unfair. But these days men are far more discriminated against than women.
Some good points. I grew up with mostly boys in th... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2018 14:42:44   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
You are anything but !!! Always a gracious lady that kneows whats up... Your granddaughter luccky to have you..

The milleninals of this day don’t want to do anything but what they want and with little effort.. I pity the “men that wind up with their attitudes ?You hungry, fix yourself something, I’m not your s***e~~ lolo I’d laugh but its the t***h.. Marriage isn’t needed, neither know commitment and dedication and only love themself..I always found great pleasure in my husband and I cooking dinner together. Walking on the beach together. I.. Always holding my hand, opening a door for me or allowing me to enter the building first etc. etc. all that is going away text and women are going to regret it later on....i do not call myself a feminist, if anything I’m simply feminin and live exactly the way I am.. I value, appreciate and respect my fellow partner and am not the least intimidated by he or any other male.. We are Opposite sexes for a reason and I sure am glad we are!

TexaCan wrote:
Absolutely agree with you! When my granddaughter came along, I taught her that it was fine being a tomboy, give them boys Hello!!!!!! But ALWAYS remember you are a lady and conduct yourself accordingly! The ladies of today don’t realize the ‘fringe benefits’ that came along with being treated like a lady, and are missing today.......but what do I know, I’m an ‘old lady’

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 14:45:59   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
I guess the proof is in the pudding of facts, not simply your opinion of things~~~

Nickolai wrote:
Liberals don't legislate from the bench they interpret the constitution Womens right to privacy under the 9th and 14th amendment and the right for same sex marriage under the 14th amendment but when the rulings are not what conservatives like they call it legislating from the bench



Reply
Oct 6, 2018 15:03:45   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
y
debeda wrote:
Yep. The dems do have the most amazing word smiths and spin doctors.


You are being very nice in describing those Obstinate, self righteous, grandiose boisters of nothing..... I lke it...👏🏻

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 15:33:21   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
y

You are being very nice in describing those Obstinate, self righteous, grandiose boisters of nothing..... I lke it...👏🏻


I Know Why Evangelical Women Support Brett Kavanaugh. I Was Raised To Do The Same.

Carly Gelsinger


It seems a lot of people can’t fathom why a woman, regardless of political beliefs, would support Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in light of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony about him sexually assaulting her.
I can, and here’s why.

There exists a generation of women who were never taught consent ― and I’m not talking about Boomers. I’m talking about the hundreds of thousands of us who were raised in church and came of age at the turn of the millennium.
In our world, we were taught that our bodies didn’t belong to ourselves. God owned them, they said, but really, that meant that men owned them. Our fathers. Our pastors. Our husbands. Our politicians. Never ourselves.

This is, of course, the foundation of the 1990s evangelical movement known as “purity culture.” A pendulum swing from the free love culture of the 1970s and the AIDS scare of the 1980s, the 1990s were all about abstinence. Evangelicals took it upon themselves to stop a generation from promiscuity. They forged a mascot, a slogan (“True Love Waits”), held “purity balls,” manufactured an endless supply of merchandise — and voila! Purity culture, a subculture within an already-bizarre evangelical subculture, was born.
Purity culture taught young girls to bear responsibility for men’s lust. When we got dressed in the morning, we were supposed to ask ourselves what our grandfathers would think of our outfits. We wore T-shirts that said, “Modest is Hottest.

Our formative years were spent in shame over our bodies, in suspicion of our sexuality, and in earnest ownership over the behavior of men.
When I was 13, I went to my female youth pastor, shaken by the first aggressive catcall directed my way. She said, “Welcome to the wonderful world of womanhood,” with an edge of tired sarcasm to her voice. That was it. I shrugged it off and tried to shrug off the hundreds of catcalls in my future.
When I was 14, I was lying on my belly reading the Bible on the church floor before youth group. A youth leader told me to sit up. If a girl is horizontal around boys, it forces them to picture you naked, she said. It causes them to stumble.
We were taught that women who have sex before marriage are like a trampled rose. Damaged goods. Undesirable. Unworthy of love. Sometimes the metaphor used in sermon illustrations was a chewed piece of gum. The pastor would chew a piece of gum and then pass it around the room, asking if anyone else wanted to chew it after him.
When I was 15, I was violently assaulted on a mission trip. In response, my team leader literally asked me, “What were you wearing?”
This famous phrase is not just an internet meme. People actually say it to women, and even more destructively, to young girls. They said it to me. I shut up about that assault for a good decade after that.
When I was 16, I sat in a dark movie theater with my crush, alarmed by my desire to hold his hand. It was my first official date, and I was too consumed with fear to enjoy it. You see, we were taught that women who have sex before marriage are like a trampled rose. Damaged goods. Undesirable. Unworthy of love.
Sometimes the metaphor used in sermon illustrations was a chewed piece of gum. The pastor would chew a piece of gum and then pass it around the room, asking if anyone else wanted to chew it after him. Sometimes it was a piece of tape that had lost its stickiness. Sometimes it was a torn-up piece of construction paper. The sermon illustrations differed, but the message was always the same. With these images seared into my mind, I cut off contact with my crush after that night.
When I was 17, I attended a purity retreat where I signed a pledge to “save myself” for my future husband. I didn’t even think about what I wanted, because that didn’t matter. My body wasn’t my own.
When I was 18, in college, a guy at my Christian school lectured my friend and me for stretching in the student union. He said it caused him to picture us in the positions we could maintain in bed and that we should work harder to protect his thoughts.
We acquiesced. After all, we wanted to be women of God, worthy of our future husbands.

When I was 19, another girlfriend of mine went to visit a guy who was housesitting off campus. She kissed him on the sofa after a movie, and then gathered her keys to leave. He forced himself on her. She came back to the dorms in tears. She didn’t report it because we knew that girls who had sex were expelled from school.
There was so much shame regarding sex in evangelical circles that none of it — consensual or otherwise — was talked about. There was no difference. It was all sin.
When I was 20, my Christian boyfriend dumped me. “I want a pure woman,” he told me after one of our kissing sessions. We hadn’t even had sex. “Maybe if your cleavage wasn’t always out I could have controlled myself,” he suggested. I promised him we could stop making out. That wasn’t enough. We already had. I was damaged goods.
When I was 21, I was engaged to another Christian man. We stuck to the pledges we had made as teenagers. We sought Christian counsel to prepare ourselves for marriage. Always be available to your husband, they said. If you don’t fulfill his needs, he will lust after other women. Until then, continue to be sexless. Try not to even think about it. An impure mind is the start of all sins.
By then, I was damn well ready to have sex, yet I did not until after the cake was cut. I had made a promise to other people. My body was not my own.
I’ve had to unlearn so many ideas about sex and the female body. I had to relearn basic concepts of bodily autonomy, sexual consent, and sex/body positivity. Purity culture uses fear to try to stop women from being autonomous over their bodies. At its core, it is about control.

When I was 22, I began to untangle myself from the mess of purity culture. I’ve had to unlearn so many ideas about sex and the female body. I had to relearn basic concepts of bodily autonomy, sexual consent, and sex/body positivity. Purity culture uses fear to try to stop women from being autonomous over their bodies. At its core, it is about control.
So this is why it is not surprising to me that so many women are rushing to protect Kavanaugh and deriding Ford. The women who grew up being guardians of male sexuality are now approaching middle age, and many of us are still assuming that role and expecting other women to as well.
The lingering effects of purity culture run deep. We were taught to distrust women — beginning with ourselves.
Carly Gelsinger lives in California with her husband and two daughters. She holds a master’s in journalism and runs a small business helping people write their stories. Her first book, Once You Go In: A Memoir of Radical Faith, will be released in October 2018 and is the story of her experience being lured into and escaping a fundamentalist church. Learn more about Carly at by visiting her official website.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-evangelical-women_us_5bb3a28de4b0ba8bb211985b

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2018 16:38:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I Know Why Evangelical Women Support Brett Kavanaugh. I Was Raised To Do The Same.

Carly Gelsinger


It seems a lot of people can’t fathom why a woman, regardless of political beliefs, would support Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in light of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony about him sexually assaulting her.
I can, and here’s why.

There exists a generation of women who were never taught consent ― and I’m not talking about Boomers. I’m talking about the hundreds of thousands of us who were raised in church and came of age at the turn of the millennium.
In our world, we were taught that our bodies didn’t belong to ourselves. God owned them, they said, but really, that meant that men owned them. Our fathers. Our pastors. Our husbands. Our politicians. Never ourselves.

This is, of course, the foundation of the 1990s evangelical movement known as “purity culture.” A pendulum swing from the free love culture of the 1970s and the AIDS scare of the 1980s, the 1990s were all about abstinence. Evangelicals took it upon themselves to stop a generation from promiscuity. They forged a mascot, a slogan (“True Love Waits”), held “purity balls,” manufactured an endless supply of merchandise — and voila! Purity culture, a subculture within an already-bizarre evangelical subculture, was born.
Purity culture taught young girls to bear responsibility for men’s lust. When we got dressed in the morning, we were supposed to ask ourselves what our grandfathers would think of our outfits. We wore T-shirts that said, “Modest is Hottest.

Our formative years were spent in shame over our bodies, in suspicion of our sexuality, and in earnest ownership over the behavior of men.
When I was 13, I went to my female youth pastor, shaken by the first aggressive catcall directed my way. She said, “Welcome to the wonderful world of womanhood,” with an edge of tired sarcasm to her voice. That was it. I shrugged it off and tried to shrug off the hundreds of catcalls in my future.
When I was 14, I was lying on my belly reading the Bible on the church floor before youth group. A youth leader told me to sit up. If a girl is horizontal around boys, it forces them to picture you naked, she said. It causes them to stumble.
We were taught that women who have sex before marriage are like a trampled rose. Damaged goods. Undesirable. Unworthy of love. Sometimes the metaphor used in sermon illustrations was a chewed piece of gum. The pastor would chew a piece of gum and then pass it around the room, asking if anyone else wanted to chew it after him.
When I was 15, I was violently assaulted on a mission trip. In response, my team leader literally asked me, “What were you wearing?”
This famous phrase is not just an internet meme. People actually say it to women, and even more destructively, to young girls. They said it to me. I shut up about that assault for a good decade after that.
When I was 16, I sat in a dark movie theater with my crush, alarmed by my desire to hold his hand. It was my first official date, and I was too consumed with fear to enjoy it. You see, we were taught that women who have sex before marriage are like a trampled rose. Damaged goods. Undesirable. Unworthy of love.
Sometimes the metaphor used in sermon illustrations was a chewed piece of gum. The pastor would chew a piece of gum and then pass it around the room, asking if anyone else wanted to chew it after him. Sometimes it was a piece of tape that had lost its stickiness. Sometimes it was a torn-up piece of construction paper. The sermon illustrations differed, but the message was always the same. With these images seared into my mind, I cut off contact with my crush after that night.
When I was 17, I attended a purity retreat where I signed a pledge to “save myself” for my future husband. I didn’t even think about what I wanted, because that didn’t matter. My body wasn’t my own.
When I was 18, in college, a guy at my Christian school lectured my friend and me for stretching in the student union. He said it caused him to picture us in the positions we could maintain in bed and that we should work harder to protect his thoughts.
We acquiesced. After all, we wanted to be women of God, worthy of our future husbands.

When I was 19, another girlfriend of mine went to visit a guy who was housesitting off campus. She kissed him on the sofa after a movie, and then gathered her keys to leave. He forced himself on her. She came back to the dorms in tears. She didn’t report it because we knew that girls who had sex were expelled from school.
There was so much shame regarding sex in evangelical circles that none of it — consensual or otherwise — was talked about. There was no difference. It was all sin.
When I was 20, my Christian boyfriend dumped me. “I want a pure woman,” he told me after one of our kissing sessions. We hadn’t even had sex. “Maybe if your cleavage wasn’t always out I could have controlled myself,” he suggested. I promised him we could stop making out. That wasn’t enough. We already had. I was damaged goods.
When I was 21, I was engaged to another Christian man. We stuck to the pledges we had made as teenagers. We sought Christian counsel to prepare ourselves for marriage. Always be available to your husband, they said. If you don’t fulfill his needs, he will lust after other women. Until then, continue to be sexless. Try not to even think about it. An impure mind is the start of all sins.
By then, I was damn well ready to have sex, yet I did not until after the cake was cut. I had made a promise to other people. My body was not my own.
I’ve had to unlearn so many ideas about sex and the female body. I had to relearn basic concepts of bodily autonomy, sexual consent, and sex/body positivity. Purity culture uses fear to try to stop women from being autonomous over their bodies. At its core, it is about control.

When I was 22, I began to untangle myself from the mess of purity culture. I’ve had to unlearn so many ideas about sex and the female body. I had to relearn basic concepts of bodily autonomy, sexual consent, and sex/body positivity. Purity culture uses fear to try to stop women from being autonomous over their bodies. At its core, it is about control.
So this is why it is not surprising to me that so many women are rushing to protect Kavanaugh and deriding Ford. The women who grew up being guardians of male sexuality are now approaching middle age, and many of us are still assuming that role and expecting other women to as well.
The lingering effects of purity culture run deep. We were taught to distrust women — beginning with ourselves.
Carly Gelsinger lives in California with her husband and two daughters. She holds a master’s in journalism and runs a small business helping people write their stories. Her first book, Once You Go In: A Memoir of Radical Faith, will be released in October 2018 and is the story of her experience being lured into and escaping a fundamentalist church. Learn more about Carly at by visiting her official website.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-evangelical-women_us_5bb3a28de4b0ba8bb211985b
I Know Why Evangelical Women Support Brett Kavanau... (show quote)


There is a lot of t***h and I suspect embellishment of the womens claims.. Meaning for her growing up it was as she recited it.. Not all were raised like she was.. While I don’t know her age she implies being of middle age”..

I can tell you that was not my teaching from my parents or even my Grandmother, Cheif of Nursing... She explained the birds and bees in a beautiful way of how the body is your domaine and not to shared etc but once in love it is the most sacred expression of that love etccc.....

Oops, just a second~~ just got confirmation Senate has confrmed Kavanaugh...

Anyway, I had no fear or Trepidation over what the future held for me nor was I thought that my body was owned by anyone other than myself. To the contrary I was taught that no meant no and don’t ever allow myself to be miss led by the intentions of a boyfriend. My dad was pretty cool about it he said lay with one and you’ll never be the one that is respected enough to be taken home to meet the family..

The purity culture is something that must’ve been before my time. In growing up, maybe that’s why I don’t put much credence to it.. As well as believing I am my own person and I make choices for myself that’s how I was raised.

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 17:00:23   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
There is a lot of t***h and I suspect embellishment of the womens claims.. Meaning for her growing up it was as she recited it.. Not all were raised like she was.. While I don’t know her age she implies being of middle age”..

I can tell you that was not my teaching from my parents or even my Grandmother, Cheif of Nursing... She explained the birds and bees in a beautiful way of how the body is your domaine and not to shared etc but once in love it wis the most sacred expression of that loveetccc.....

Oops, just a second~~ just got confirmation Senate has confrmed Kavanaugh.
There is a lot of t***h and I suspect embellishmen... (show quote)


I was really interested in your birds and bees story.

Reply
Oct 6, 2018 17:18:34   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I was really interested in your birds and bees story.


Lol, cute.. Ok, Yes, our bodes are different, one of the special gifts is the difference being what in time brings, life, love, children and in all that what you develope into as you come to understand boys are fine tuned to wanting to bed you so they can share it with everyone..its natural, its healthy and it will come up frequently...

They defined every part of my body and its function, they defined a boys including his mind of conquer... As they put it, all laughing at times.. You get the picture...
My mother said” your body is sacred until you have found the one you know is your love of your life and when that happens you will want to give totally and completely to him..

I was never told that I owed any boy or man anything nor that they owned me.. Just the opposite really.. I guess I need to Thank the womens movement for starting the true changes that once dictated how we were to act.. I don’t mean the woman’s march that took place after Trump was nominated president but rather the suffragists under Anthony that circulated petitions and lobbied Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to enfranchise women...

Reply
Oct 7, 2018 19:11:22   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
lindajoy wrote:
There is a lot of t***h and I suspect embellishment of the womens claims.. Meaning for her growing up it was as she recited it.. Not all were raised like she was.. While I don’t know her age she implies being of middle age”..

I can tell you that was not my teaching from my parents or even my Grandmother, Cheif of Nursing... She explained the birds and bees in a beautiful way of how the body is your domaine and not to shared etc but once in love it is the most sacred expression of that love etccc.....

Oops, just a second~~ just got confirmation Senate has confrmed Kavanaugh...

Anyway, I had no fear or Trepidation over what the future held for me nor was I thought that my body was owned by anyone other than myself. To the contrary I was taught that no meant no and don’t ever allow myself to be miss led by the intentions of a boyfriend. My dad was pretty cool about it he said lay with one and you’ll never be the one that is respected enough to be taken home to meet the family..

The purity culture is something that must’ve been before my time. In growing up, maybe that’s why I don’t put much credence to it.. As well as believing I am my own person and I make choices for myself that’s how I was raised.
There is a lot of t***h and I suspect embellishmen... (show quote)


Well stated LJ. Thanks for taking the time.
IMO;
My dad always told us as teenagers. When you sleep with a woman, you are married.
I was lucky. My mom and dad were soul mates.

IMO; Sex without love may feel good, but it is not very special.
Can't say
Sex without Love is just friction.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 14 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.