I was following the case of the 17 year old who was raped and wanted an a******n. Texas ate up the clock for weeks making her jump through hoops proving her mental state as to whether she was of sound mind to make such a decision. She was further blocked once courts said she could proceed (with a constitutionally legal a******n). It was taken up by the circuit court Kananaugh sat on. As a judge he had few things to look at, had she met the court's requirements (she had), was this legal according to the law and constitution (it was). Rather than overturn the lower court which is what he apparently would have liked to do, he imposed another round of guardianship where it was to be their decision, counseling, and mental state to be adjudicated once again, thereby eating up a few weeks of the few weeks she had left before 20 months when it couldn't be legally done.

His decision was quickly overturned, proving he had disregarded the constitution and the law.

We do not need judges on the supreme court that can't adhere to simple laws without bringing their own beliefs and ideals into the picture. Nor is it acceptable to have a judge that lies in confirmation hearings when he knows that the t***h jeopardizes his appointment, this is why questions are asked is to determine fitness.

I was following the case of the 17 year old who was raped and wanted an a******n. Texas ate up the clock for weeks making her jump through hoops proving her mental state as to whether she was of sound mind to make such a decision. She was further blocked once courts said she could proceed (with a constitutionally legal a******n). It was taken up by the circuit court Kananaugh sat on. As a judge he had few things to look at, had she met the court's requirements (she had), was this legal according to the law and constitution (it was). Rather than overturn the lower court which is what he apparently would have liked to do, he imposed another round of guardianship where it was to be their decision, counseling, and mental state to be adjudicated once again, thereby eating up a few weeks of the few weeks she had left before 20 months when it couldn't be legally done.

His decision was quickly overturned, proving he had disregarded the constitution and the law.

We do not need judges on the supreme court that can't adhere to simple laws without bringing their own beliefs and ideals into the picture. Nor is it acceptable to have a judge that lies in confirmation hearings when he knows that the t***h jeopardizes his appointment, this is why questions are asked is to determine fitness.

I was following the case of the 17 year old who was raped and wanted an a******n. Texas ate up the clock for weeks making her jump through hoops proving her mental state as to whether she was of sound mind to make such a decision. She was further blocked once courts said she could proceed (with a constitutionally legal a******n). It was taken up by the circuit court Kananaugh sat on. As a judge he had few things to look at, had she met the court's requirements (she had), was this legal according to the law and constitution (it was). Rather than overturn the lower court which is what he apparently would have liked to do, he imposed another round of guardianship where it was to be their decision, counseling, and mental state to be adjudicated once again, thereby eating up a few weeks of the few weeks she had left before 20 months when it couldn't be legally done.

His decision was quickly overturned, proving he had disregarded the constitution and the law.

We do not need judges on the supreme court that can't adhere to simple laws without bringing their own beliefs and ideals into the picture. Nor is it acceptable to have a judge that lies in confirmation hearings when he knows that the t***h jeopardizes his appointment, this is why questions are asked is to determine fitness.

Where is it written in the laws passed by congress that women have a right to a******ns?. What is relevant herein this discussion is that the CONSTITUTION gives only CONGRESS the authority to make laws. Not the SCOTUS. My legal argument as presented is what the Demos are afraid of this abuse of the Constituion.. CONGRESS for decades has failed to do their jobs and have passed their responsibilities off to the SCOTUS & bureaucrats. Bureaucrats make 1000s of laws and regulations that take away liberties, raping citizens of their wealth and putting them in prison. The big C says only congress has this authority. I watch CSPAN every day and I see congress with nobody there. Congress is only in session 128 days a year; but Mondays and Fridays are travel days and they aren't there doing the peoples work. Shameful

Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
September 18, 2018 by patriotalerts
Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
Even if Christine Blasey Ford was perfectly sincere in her allegation against SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the Democrats are not.


As Fox News host Tucker Carlson laid it out Monday night, “This story doesn’t have anything to do with justice.” For the Democrats, it’s all “about a******n.”

36 years ago…
Ford, now a college psychology professor in California, alleges that, while they were both high schoolers in the early 1980’s, Kavanagh attempted to sexually assault her at a house party.

The Democrats seized on the decades-old allegation with the desperation of a drowning man — it’s the only bit of dirt they’ve managed to dig up on the highly qualified and thoroughly vetted candidate.


For Democrats, Kavanaugh’s nomination process has never about anything more than pure obstructionism, fueled by an all-consuming fear that Roe v. Wade just might possibly be weakened — even though Kavanaugh has yet to say much of anything indicating a lack of support for the 1973 decision.

“The story doesn’t have anything to do with justice actually, or even with what Brett Kavanaugh might have done in high school. Underneath it all, anyone who lives in Washington can tell you, it’s all about a******n,” Carlson explained during his Fox News show, “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Monday night.

“Does anyone really believe this story would have surfaced if Kavanaugh would have pledged allegiance to Roe v. Wade.?,” he asked.

No, it would not have.

Dems defended pro-a******n Clinton, Kennedy
Politicians who were solidly pro-a******n have gotten a pass from Democrats in the past, Carlson pointed out.

“Some of the very people suggesting Kavanaugh is a sex criminal defended Bill Clinton when he was credibly accused of rape,” Carlson said, referring to Julia Broaddrick, whose allegation of rape against Bill Clinton has never been given serious consideration by the Democrats.


“The same group practically beatified [late Massachusetts Sen.] Ted Kennedy,” Carlson went on, even after Kennedy’s scandalous and tragic Chappaquiddick car accident in which 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne was k**led in 1969.

It’s personal
What’s different here? Kavanaugh, as a Republican nominee, is a potential threat to the Democrats — and they can’t stand to give even an inch.

As Carlson tweeted later, “The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture.”

Tucker Carlson

@TuckerCarlson
The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture

And the examples are many. We saw it in fired FBI agent Peter Strzok’s impudent testimony before the Senate. We saw that in former Vice President Joe Biden, who just last week called Trump v**ers — Americans, actually — the “dregs of society.”

And we can see it in failed p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton, who, despite not holding any public office, from the very beginning of the Kavanaugh Senate hearings has been almost desperately tweeting, “#StopKavanaugh.” Ford’s allegation, however thin, is all the Democrats have right now — so expect them to milk it for all it’s worth.

Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
September 18, 2018 by patriotalerts
Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
Even if Christine Blasey Ford was perfectly sincere in her allegation against SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the Democrats are not.


As Fox News host Tucker Carlson laid it out Monday night, “This story doesn’t have anything to do with justice.” For the Democrats, it’s all “about a******n.”

36 years ago…
Ford, now a college psychology professor in California, alleges that, while they were both high schoolers in the early 1980’s, Kavanagh attempted to sexually assault her at a house party.

The Democrats seized on the decades-old allegation with the desperation of a drowning man — it’s the only bit of dirt they’ve managed to dig up on the highly qualified and thoroughly vetted candidate.


For Democrats, Kavanaugh’s nomination process has never about anything more than pure obstructionism, fueled by an all-consuming fear that Roe v. Wade just might possibly be weakened — even though Kavanaugh has yet to say much of anything indicating a lack of support for the 1973 decision.

“The story doesn’t have anything to do with justice actually, or even with what Brett Kavanaugh might have done in high school. Underneath it all, anyone who lives in Washington can tell you, it’s all about a******n,” Carlson explained during his Fox News show, “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Monday night.

“Does anyone really believe this story would have surfaced if Kavanaugh would have pledged allegiance to Roe v. Wade.?,” he asked.

No, it would not have.

Dems defended pro-a******n Clinton, Kennedy
Politicians who were solidly pro-a******n have gotten a pass from Democrats in the past, Carlson pointed out.

“Some of the very people suggesting Kavanaugh is a sex criminal defended Bill Clinton when he was credibly accused of rape,” Carlson said, referring to Julia Broaddrick, whose allegation of rape against Bill Clinton has never been given serious consideration by the Democrats.


All the fuss is about stalling the conformation until after the Demos take the Senate and Cav will never be confirmed.

“The same group practically beatified [late Massachusetts Sen.] Ted Kennedy,” Carlson went on, even after Kennedy’s scandalous and tragic Chappaquiddick car accident in which 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne was k**led in 1969.

It’s personal
What’s different here? Kavanaugh, as a Republican nominee, is a potential threat to the Democrats — and they can’t stand to give even an inch.

As Carlson tweeted later, “The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture.”

Tucker Carlson

@TuckerCarlson
The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture

And the examples are many. We saw it in fired FBI agent Peter Strzok’s impudent testimony before the Senate. We saw that in former Vice President Joe Biden, who just last week called Trump v**ers — Americans, actually — the “dregs of society.”

And we can see it in failed p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton, who, despite not holding any public office, from the very beginning of the Kavanaugh Senate hearings has been almost desperately tweeting, “#StopKavanaugh.” Ford’s allegation, however thin, is all the Democrats have right now — so expect them to milk it for all it’s worth.

I was following the case of the 17 year old who was raped and wanted an a******n. Texas ate up the clock for weeks making her jump through hoops proving her mental state as to whether she was of sound mind to make such a dcsion.

OMITTED

Rather than overturn the lower court which is what he apparently would have liked to do, he imposed another round of guardianship where it was to be their decision, counseling, and mental state to be adjudicated once again, thereby eating up a few weeks of the few weeks she had left before 20 months when it couldn't be legally done.

Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
September 18, 2018 by patriotalerts
Carlson: For the Dems, the Kavanaugh allegation isn’t about justice, it’s ‘all about a******n’
Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
Even if Christine Blasey Ford was perfectly sincere in her allegation against SCOTUS nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the Democrats are not.


As Fox News host Tucker Carlson laid it out Monday night, “This story doesn’t have anything to do with justice.” For the Democrats, it’s all “about a******n.”

36 years ago…
Ford, now a college psychology professor in California, alleges that, while they were both high schoolers in the early 1980’s, Kavanagh attempted to sexually assault her at a house party.

The Democrats seized on the decades-old allegation with the desperation of a drowning man — it’s the only bit of dirt they’ve managed to dig up on the highly qualified and thoroughly vetted candidate.


For Democrats, Kavanaugh’s nomination process has never about anything more than pure obstructionism, fueled by an all-consuming fear that Roe v. Wade just might possibly be weakened — even though Kavanaugh has yet to say much of anything indicating a lack of support for the 1973 decision.

“The story doesn’t have anything to do with justice actually, or even with what Brett Kavanaugh might have done in high school. Underneath it all, anyone who lives in Washington can tell you, it’s all about a******n,” Carlson explained during his Fox News show, “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Monday night.

“Does anyone really believe this story would have surfaced if Kavanaugh would have pledged allegiance to Roe v. Wade.?,” he asked.

No, it would not have.

Dems defended pro-a******n Clinton, Kennedy
Politicians who were solidly pro-a******n have gotten a pass from Democrats in the past, Carlson pointed out.

“Some of the very people suggesting Kavanaugh is a sex criminal defended Bill Clinton when he was credibly accused of rape,” Carlson said, referring to Julia Broaddrick, whose allegation of rape against Bill Clinton has never been given serious consideration by the Democrats.


“The same group practically beatified [late Massachusetts Sen.] Ted Kennedy,” Carlson went on, even after Kennedy’s scandalous and tragic Chappaquiddick car accident in which 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne was k**led in 1969.

It’s personal
What’s different here? Kavanaugh, as a Republican nominee, is a potential threat to the Democrats — and they can’t stand to give even an inch.

As Carlson tweeted later, “The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture.”

Tucker Carlson

@TuckerCarlson
The larger lesson of the past 2 yrs is the left will not abide losing power, even temporarily. For liberals, political power is personal power. W/out it, they’re exposed & terrified. Some become vicious. They believe they’re meant to run this country, our government & our culture

And the examples are many. We saw it in fired FBI agent Peter Strzok’s impudent testimony before the Senate. We saw that in former Vice President Joe Biden, who just last week called Trump v**ers — Americans, actually — the “dregs of society.”

And we can see it in failed p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton, who, despite not holding any public office, from the very beginning of the Kavanaugh Senate hearings has been almost desperately tweeting, “#StopKavanaugh.” Ford’s allegation, however thin, is all the Democrats have right now — so expect them to milk it for all it’s worth.