One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Kavanaugh may have, innocently or not, screwed himself
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Sep 20, 2018 10:53:10   #
son of witless
 
rumitoid wrote:
No one said or suggested he was a rapist. Where did you get an accusation in simply quoting him? That can only be your assumption. Just Kavanaugh's own words and nothing more. You are jumping to conclusions.


Maybe you are not reading the same stories I am reading. The woman seems to be accusing him of attempted rape. So what am I missing????? What he said would be laughed at by any court if it was put forth as supporting evidence to back up the accuser's story.

So splain to me what conclusions you believe that I am jumping to. In detail !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 11:41:09   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
http://sv.afasv.net/t/ecfbbBDIrQAOHcWRkLYfaMPNy32CgaaaaDKgBN-HKK9a?p=8x-0C183~0Cz&j=2Az9y5_brVng.hjr&g=g&s=


What Should Be Done About the Kavanaugh Nomination?

Monday, September 17, 2018 @ 1:05 PM

What Should Be Done About the Kavanaugh Nomination?


Bryan Fischer
Host of "Focal Point"


An accuser has crawled out of the shadows to charge Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh with sexual assault. The accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, contends that 36 years ago Kavanaugh, in a drunken stupor, shut her in a room at a party and clumsily attempted to undress her.

She contends that another male, apparently one Mark Judge, was also present and was also a participant. Kavanaugh and Judge have both categorically denied the event ever happened. Said Kavanaugh, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

Judge was equally emphatic. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way.”

We can pile on top of that the testimony of 65 female high school contemporaries of Kavanaugh’s who all signed a letter vouching for his integrity. “For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

All of the female clerks who have worked with Kavanaugh likewise vouch for his integrity and character. This is the first thing that ought to arouse a Mt. Olympus of doubt about Ms. Ford’s lurid accusations. You have, on the one side, everybody who’s ever known Kavanaugh, gone to school with him, worked under him, worked with him, and had even a passing acquaintance with him, unanimously affirming his character.

Kavanaugh has been through six FBI background investigations and passed every one with flying colors.

Then, on the other side, you have Christine Blasey Ford. It is worthy of note that Ms. Ford is a registered Democrat who has donated to various and sundry Democratic recipients.

Ms. Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, has made a career out of dismissing sexual assault allegations against liberal politicians. She has donated at least $26,000 since 2004 to Democratic politicians such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry. She’s made donations to MoveOn.org and other liberal activist groups.

Ms. Katz defended Al Franken when a photo emerged of him engaging in mock groping of a sleeping colleague.

She lacerated Paula Jones when she went public with her assault allegations against President Clinton, which cost the former president a cool $850,000 in a settlement. Ms. Katz dismissed Ms. Jones’ assertions on the grounds that, “Paula Jones’ suit is very, very weak. She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”

She continued through the 90s to argue that because Ms. Jones could not show that the harassment was “severe and pervasive,” she simply did not have a case. She told the media in 1998 that if a woman came to her for representation with a similar fact pattern, she would “probably tell her that, I’m sorry, it’s unfair, but you don’t have a case.”

Plus, she has called Donald Trump supporters “miscreants,” and noted that the term “‘basket of deplorables’ is far too generous a description for these people.”

Ms. Ford apparently did not divulge Kavanaugh’s name until a couples’ therapy session in 2012.

So what should be done? The Bible is very clear that no serious allegation should ever be accepted against someone on the basis of one lone allegation. “A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or or three witnesses shall a charge be established” (Deuteronomy 19:15).

Lest you think this is just an outdated, archaic Old Testament standard, Jesus himself affirmed the same standard in Matthew 18:16: “Every charge (must) be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.”

On this rock solid divine basis of justice, Ms. Ford’s case falls to the ground and shatters into little, tiny, inconsequential shards. This is no corroborating witness, not a single one. There is no corroborating evidence, not a bit. If this event even happened, the only two supposed witnesses both flatly deny that anything like this occurred.

What does all this mean? Here’s what should happen. Ms. Ford’s accusations should be dismissed with extreme prejudice, Mr. Kavanaugh’s nomination should be sent to the floor of the Senate this Thursday as scheduled, the Senate should v**e to confirm him as soon as possible, and he should take his rightful place on the Supreme Court bench by the first Monday in October.

Anything else is a travesty of a mockery of a sham, making Brett Kavanaugh a victim of a gross miscarriage of justice before he ever dons the robe of the Supreme Court.

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 19:20:02   #
rumitoid
 
son of witless wrote:
So “Which is what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. That’s been a good thing for all of us.” that makes him a would be rapist ?

" As Mother Jones points out, a book by Judge mentions Kavanaugh and his apparent love of binge-drinking while at the school. " So that makes him a rapist ?

Pretty i***tic.


No one said it did. I merely reported what he had said. Innocent or not, I said, it may cause him a problem. No judgment or suggestion.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2018 19:23:34   #
rumitoid
 
proud republican wrote:
Republicans released close to a million of paperwork and emails...More then 5 other Supreme Court nominees combined!!!!What the hell else do you want from him????


Re-read. They delayed all that paperwork until the day of the hearing, denying the Democrats adequate time to reviews thousands of documents, and inappropriately barring from public view according to the rules of evidence.

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 19:25:27   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
rumitoid wrote:
Re-read. They delayed all that paperwork until the day of the hearing, denying the Democrats adequate time to reviews thousands of documents.


Nope...They delayed or so DempnCraps say 10,000 of documents..They gave them close to million...

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 19:49:56   #
son of witless
 
rumitoid wrote:
No one said it did. I merely reported what he had said. Innocent or not, I said, it may cause him a problem. No judgment or suggestion.


By posting it you are implying. Oh yes you is.

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 20:09:07   #
Nickolai
 
Forkbassman wrote:
That does not matter to libs or progressives!!! Look at their playbook, Rules for Radicals! It is their bible. What does it say? Demonize & destroy your opponent. Kavanaugh, Trump & all so called conservatives are beneath them & do not belong in power. Look at Maxine Waters’ own words. Her ilk are sick & delusional.




I haven't read that book but I do know Conservatives have been demonizing liberals for the last 50 years to such an extent Liberals began referring to them selves as progressives since Conservatives turned the word liberal into a four letter word

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2018 20:11:14   #
Nickolai
 
vernon wrote:
Evidence ,That woman who is a druggie, is the only person to have anybody say something bad about Kavanaugh.Are you saying that we should take her word as evidence?He dosen't have to prove his innocence she has to prove his guilt.





She provided a witness Mark Judge

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 20:12:34   #
truthiness
 
proud republican wrote:
Nope...They delayed or so DempnCraps say 10,000 of documents..They gave them close to million...


They sent the wrong million. If they could send 1 million, why could they not send the rest? Hiding something?

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 20:18:12   #
Nickolai
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Do you know how to use an internet search engine?

65 WOMEN WHO KNEW THE JUDGE SAY HIS REPUTATION WAS IMPECCABLE

Sixty-five women of bipartisan backgrounds vouch for him. They signed a statement out of the Senate Judiciary that read: “For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect” and has “stood out for his friendship, character, and integrity”
Do you know how to use an internet search engine? ... (show quote)





Where did they find these 65 women so soon???

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 20:21:38   #
Nickolai
 
BigMike wrote:
Win the mid-terms, of course; defectors from the Democrat Party v**e Republican; see Kavanaugh confirmed...in whichever order; charges brought against the instigators of this Russia crap...and there's a bunch of them; more Establishment/g*******t pukes from BOTH parties run out of office, resign, get beat; fix the leaky border; deregulate...

Plus...if the left misbehaves when their hopes and dreams begin to get indicted and they lose the mid-terms Trump is ready to take action and so are we. Keep the r**ting in designated areas if Trump allows them to exist. 2016 this won't be.

Mark the 20th on your calendar.
Win the mid-terms, of course; defectors from the D... (show quote)






Winning the mid terms with a President that polls below 40 % will be difficult Its only happened twice in history Your president has no coat tail

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2018 20:23:16   #
Nickolai
 
4430 wrote:
Well Nicky boy neither she nor the Judge can prove that it did or didn't happen her story sure has a lot of holes !



This seems to be another Democrat tactic they are known to pull They sat on this since July and when all their dirty tricks didn't work they pulled this one out of their bag of tricks !

Whether it is true or not I don't know this woman's claim seems to have a lot of holes in it so much she can't remember much of anything !

Where was she when he was first installed as a Judge in the beginning why didn't she come forward right then and there ? ? ? ?

I hear all about the reason women keep it to them selves out of shame and fear

This is Hogwash MY COUSIN was raped and she told her family and called the law and when they went to get him they found him dead he committed suicide

How about the 3 college kids awhile back that a girl claimed they raped her only after their lives were completely ruined she they said it never happened ! ! !

Never saying anything about it to anyone for 36 yrs and then come forward at the 11th hr when he is about to be v**ed on it seems to me it's all political and it sure stinks to be !

This is a ploy that Democrats use when they can't win One only has to look and Clarence Thomas / Hermon Cain and others to see the fact when Democrats can't win they will do what ever they can and stoop to any low in order to get their agenda thru ! Just Saying

So Nicky Boy the rumor has it that back in your High School days you took on the whole football team a drunken sexual orgy !

Now lets see you prove that it didn't happen ! ! !
Well Nicky boy neither she nor the Judge can prove... (show quote)







She provides a witness Mark Judge who was in the room at the time

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 22:39:01   #
rumitoid
 
4430 wrote:
http://sv.afasv.net/t/ecfbbBDIrQAOHcWRkLYfaMPNy32CgaaaaDKgBN-HKK9a?p=8x-0C183~0Cz&j=2Az9y5_brVng.hjr&g=g&s=


What Should Be Done About the Kavanaugh Nomination?

Monday, September 17, 2018 @ 1:05 PM

What Should Be Done About the Kavanaugh Nomination?


Bryan Fischer
Host of "Focal Point"


An accuser has crawled out of the shadows to charge Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh with sexual assault. The accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, contends that 36 years ago Kavanaugh, in a drunken stupor, shut her in a room at a party and clumsily attempted to undress her.

She contends that another male, apparently one Mark Judge, was also present and was also a participant. Kavanaugh and Judge have both categorically denied the event ever happened. Said Kavanaugh, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

Judge was equally emphatic. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way.”

We can pile on top of that the testimony of 65 female high school contemporaries of Kavanaugh’s who all signed a letter vouching for his integrity. “For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

All of the female clerks who have worked with Kavanaugh likewise vouch for his integrity and character. This is the first thing that ought to arouse a Mt. Olympus of doubt about Ms. Ford’s lurid accusations. You have, on the one side, everybody who’s ever known Kavanaugh, gone to school with him, worked under him, worked with him, and had even a passing acquaintance with him, unanimously affirming his character.

Kavanaugh has been through six FBI background investigations and passed every one with flying colors.

Then, on the other side, you have Christine Blasey Ford. It is worthy of note that Ms. Ford is a registered Democrat who has donated to various and sundry Democratic recipients.

Ms. Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, has made a career out of dismissing sexual assault allegations against liberal politicians. She has donated at least $26,000 since 2004 to Democratic politicians such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry. She’s made donations to MoveOn.org and other liberal activist groups.

Ms. Katz defended Al Franken when a photo emerged of him engaging in mock groping of a sleeping colleague.

She lacerated Paula Jones when she went public with her assault allegations against President Clinton, which cost the former president a cool $850,000 in a settlement. Ms. Katz dismissed Ms. Jones’ assertions on the grounds that, “Paula Jones’ suit is very, very weak. She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”

She continued through the 90s to argue that because Ms. Jones could not show that the harassment was “severe and pervasive,” she simply did not have a case. She told the media in 1998 that if a woman came to her for representation with a similar fact pattern, she would “probably tell her that, I’m sorry, it’s unfair, but you don’t have a case.”

Plus, she has called Donald Trump supporters “miscreants,” and noted that the term “‘basket of deplorables’ is far too generous a description for these people.”

Ms. Ford apparently did not divulge Kavanaugh’s name until a couples’ therapy session in 2012.

So what should be done? The Bible is very clear that no serious allegation should ever be accepted against someone on the basis of one lone allegation. “A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or or three witnesses shall a charge be established” (Deuteronomy 19:15).

Lest you think this is just an outdated, archaic Old Testament standard, Jesus himself affirmed the same standard in Matthew 18:16: “Every charge (must) be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.”

On this rock solid divine basis of justice, Ms. Ford’s case falls to the ground and shatters into little, tiny, inconsequential shards. This is no corroborating witness, not a single one. There is no corroborating evidence, not a bit. If this event even happened, the only two supposed witnesses both flatly deny that anything like this occurred.

What does all this mean? Here’s what should happen. Ms. Ford’s accusations should be dismissed with extreme prejudice, Mr. Kavanaugh’s nomination should be sent to the floor of the Senate this Thursday as scheduled, the Senate should v**e to confirm him as soon as possible, and he should take his rightful place on the Supreme Court bench by the first Monday in October.

Anything else is a travesty of a mockery of a sham, making Brett Kavanaugh a victim of a gross miscarriage of justice before he ever dons the robe of the Supreme Court.
http://sv.afasv.net/t/ecfbbBDIrQAOHcWRkLYfaMPNy32C... (show quote)


"An accuser has crawled out of the shadows to charge Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh with sexual assault." No spin there.

'We can pile on top of that the testimony of 65 female high school contemporaries of Kavanaugh’s who all signed a letter vouching for his integrity.' Please provide a link.

Reply
Sep 20, 2018 22:41:13   #
rumitoid
 
son of witless wrote:
By posting it you are implying. Oh yes you is.


Lol, if you find his own words as implying misconduct, that is your assumption. Nothing I said or implied.

Reply
Sep 21, 2018 08:15:08   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Nickolai wrote:
She provides a witness Mark Judge who was in the room at the time


What was his answer ?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.