Her story is falling apart
Sep 17, 2018 09:19:45 #
proud republican wrote:
65 women signed the petition on behalf of Judge Kavanaugh....Not 5, Not 6 ..Not 10..65!!!!He was vetteted 6 times by FBI and they found nothing bad in his background!!!..What else do you want????.....Just because you h**e President,doesnt mean you need to make up s**t about his choice for Supreme Court Justice!!!
I don't believe I am making up anything, I am recommending sober reflection and adequate investigation/questioning as I don't have enough information about the situation to properly decide.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
Sep 17, 2018 09:26:10 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Singularity wrote:
I don't believe I am making up anything, I am recommending sober reflection and adequate investigation/questioning as I don't have enough information about the situation to properly decide.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
Again...FBI looked at his background thoroughly not once,not twice ...6 times!!!..Im pretty sure if there was something suspicious they would of caught it by now....He also worked for White House before becoming Federal Judge...Is FBI so incompetent??????...Then this is very scary!!!
Sep 17, 2018 09:38:04 #
Singularity wrote:
I don't believe I am making up anything, I am recommending sober reflection and adequate investigation/questioning as I don't have enough information about the situation to properly decide.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
There is absolutely no reason to stop Cavanaugh's confirmation, other that the D's last ditch effort to block the nomination.
If ANY Republican turns turn coat by v****g against confermation, he or she MUST be driven out of DC!
Are there any Democrats with any integrity?
Sep 17, 2018 09:51:03 #
moldyoldy wrote:
She passed a lie detector test. Also, Kav. lied repeatedly in the hearings.
Are you aware polygraphs ARE NOT permissible as evidence in court, ever wonder why that is, they ARE NEVER accepted as evidence ever wonder why that is, NO judge allows polygraphs presented as evidence in court, ever wonder why that is ? NAW you don't have a clue hahahahahahahahaha !!!!!!
Sep 17, 2018 09:54:14 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
eagleye13 wrote:
There is absolutely no reason to stop Cavanaugh's confirmation, other that the D's last ditch effort to block the nomination.
If ANY Republican turns turn coat by v****g against confermation, he or she MUST be driven out of DC!
Are there any Democrats with any integrity?
If ANY Republican turns turn coat by v****g against confermation, he or she MUST be driven out of DC!
Are there any Democrats with any integrity?
I doubt they can even spell Integrity!!!1
Sep 17, 2018 10:12:37 #
This judge had advertisements on TV hundreds of times a day with women saying how great he was. I have never seen that before. They knew that this was coming.
Sep 17, 2018 10:18:29 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
moldyoldy wrote:
This judge had advertisements on TV hundreds of times a day with women saying how great he was. I have never seen that before. They knew that this was coming.
BS!!!!..I never seen so called advertisements!!!....Person who is not guilty,does NOT need advertisement!!!
Sep 17, 2018 10:26:42 #
moldyoldy wrote:
This judge had advertisements on TV hundreds of times a day with women saying how great he was. I have never seen that before. They knew that this was coming.
The current sharpening focus and belated disapproval of sexual degradation, in the workplace in particular and society in general, of half the human race may reveal a lack of perspicacity and focus in previous vetting processes. I'm betting W. J. Clinton was vetted a few times as well.
The times! They are a'changing.
Sep 17, 2018 10:30:04 #
Singularity wrote:
I don't believe I am making up anything, I am recommending sober reflection and adequate investigation/questioning as I don't have enough information about the situation to properly decide.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
That's why my recommendation would be to hold up the confirmation until time allows this to be investigated and settled.
A lot of people supported and protected the kinky President who was accused by the intern, Ms. Lewinsky. Turns out there is often fire where smoke is detected.
You are kidding right? You and your cabal of socialist democrats have been trying to delay Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation since the opening minutes of the Judiciary Committee's hearings, exemplified by the repugnant antics of Booker & Harris, until after the mid-terms. Your last gasp hope is that socialist democrats gain control of the Senate, thus thwarting any Supreme Court nominee President Trump ever nominates. Your silly 'smoke screen' is easily seen through and anyone with a modicum of intellect knows this. What I find despicable in this 'Borking' of Kavanaugh is the fact that partisan hack Feinstein sat on this letter, from another partisan hack for 3 months and wasn't introduced until the 11th hour of the v**e. Yep, right out of the democrat play book, find some dupe to accuse a fine, well respected Judge of attempted rape. It's simply how democrats play the game.
Sep 17, 2018 10:55:07 #
Jakebrake wrote:
You are kidding right? You and your cabal of soci... (show quote)
I has a cabal? Impressive! Now can I have a band? I always wanted to name a group Acoustic Dystrophy.
Perhaps it is a cynically well played strategy, perhaps not.
How can we find out? Or is factual confirmation totally unimportant these days? Is it all about the photo-op and sound bite?
I had noted the large number of recorded glowing testimonials from women who had worked with the nominee. I supposed it was to compensate for his low popularity among women per opinion polling. Thus they might have been deployed in certain areas of the country more aggressively.
But I don't recall past nominees bringing school aged children to sit with them throughout the hearings. Perhaps I have not been especially attentive.
He has appeared to be a superbly wonderful person, with, for some, regrettable extreme conservative leanings which are welcomed by many others.
The serial perjury is the part that bothers me more, actually.
Sep 17, 2018 10:55:49 #
Jakebrake wrote:
You are kidding right? You and your cabal of soci... (show quote)
You talk about delays, Merrick Garland, that was a delay. Or should it be called a theft.
Sep 17, 2018 11:00:47 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You talk about delays, Merrick Garland, that was a delay. Or should it be called a theft.
Theft. Yup.
Sep 17, 2018 11:03:37 #
Why are the repugs hiding his papers? He must be a super jerk if his opinions are so revolting.
Sep 17, 2018 11:05:30 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You talk about delays, Merrick Garland, that was a delay. Or should it be called a theft.
They were simply following the 'Biden' doctrine mold.
Sep 17, 2018 11:09:45 #
Jakebrake wrote:
They were simply following the 'Biden' doctrine mold.
Nothing new under the sun.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.