Kavanaugh hearings turned into a joke
Sep 7, 2018 02:08:48 #
acknowledgeurma wrote:
While I appreciate that your toss was purposefully... (show quote)
I was VERY impressed with senator Sasse!!!
Sep 7, 2018 03:52:09 #
JohnAnthony...
Loc: Langhorne, PA
...you know how?!
*I Said It Before ~ I'll Say It Again*
(like that BLOODY! HORRIFIC!! 'e******n-song':)
v v v v v ·THEY'RE ALL!· v v v v v
🎵🎶'MmmmMmmmMmmmorons!'🎶🎵
✴clarification: the diehard, 'dems ALWAYS-RIGHT!' libtards...✴
-scoff-
*I Said It Before ~ I'll Say It Again*
(like that BLOODY! HORRIFIC!! 'e******n-song':)
v v v v v ·THEY'RE ALL!· v v v v v
🎵🎶'MmmmMmmmMmmmorons!'🎶🎵
✴clarification: the diehard, 'dems ALWAYS-RIGHT!' libtards...✴
-scoff-
Sep 7, 2018 03:52:50 #
Sep 7, 2018 08:18:24 #
oldroy wrote:
When I see the words Think and Progress used together I start to doubt the article before I even start to read it. Why? Because George Soros created that place, along with Media Matters at the same time with the same reason for both. Their purpose for existence has always been to "destroy" Fox News and they have tried very hard to do it. As I call it, Stink Progress, does belong to Soros.
But , but oldroy these folks love Soros he's their p***e and joy he's their leader they want to follow into the new world order !
Sep 7, 2018 10:01:55 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
I too enjoyed Senator Saae’s dressing down of his cohorts.
acknowledgeurma wrote:
While I appreciate that your toss was purposefully... (show quote)
Sep 7, 2018 13:01:33 #
oldroy wrote:
When I see the words Think and Progress used together I start to doubt the article before I even start to read it. Why? Because George Soros created that place, along with Media Matters at the same time with the same reason for both. Their purpose for existence has always been to "destroy" Fox News and they have tried very hard to do it. As I call it, Stink Progress, does belong to Soros.
I am well aware that people often want to ignore a message when they find the messenger of dubious character. I have this tendency. Knowing the source (that contradicted padremike's statement) might be suspect for some, I asked padremike to provide some source for the statement "Ginsberg [sic] married two homosexuals before it was legal".
Here is another source that contradicts padremike's statement:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/justices-oconnor-ginsburg-perform-same-sex-marriage-ceremonies-inside-supre
Wherein:
WASHINGTON, D.C., October 31, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – This week saw two same-sex “weddings” performed within the walls of the United States Supreme Court, presided over by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, respectively.
While same-sex “marriage” has been legal in Washington, D.C., since 2009, the federal DOMA law defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman prohibited such ceremonies from being performed on federal property. Ginsburg v**ed to strike down a provision of DOMA in June.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.