Poll: 60 percent disapprove of Trump, while clear majorities back Mueller and Sessions
Aug 31, 2018 10:13:16 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
lindajoy wrote:
Your post is from the Washington Post, whom you obviously do believe, not Trump.~~ 
You got that right.
Aug 31, 2018 22:15:03 #
Aug 31, 2018 22:32:59 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
Bad Bob wrote:
You got that right.
no one wants to hear anything from jeff beelzebub's washinton compost rag
except brainwashed maoist,marxist,home grown kommie party idjits
Aug 31, 2018 22:51:19 #
Crayons wrote:
no one wants to hear anything from jeff beelzebub's washinton compost rag
except brainwashed maoist,marxist,home grown kommie party idjits
except brainwashed maoist,marxist,home grown kommie party idjits
You do have a way with words, Crayons....
Aug 31, 2018 23:02:18 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
lindajoy wrote:
You do have a way with words, Crayons....
yer right--yer right...polk salad annie...
Aug 31, 2018 23:21:04 #
Crayons wrote:
yer right--yer right...polk salad annie...
Yer right~~ yet right~~~
https://youtu.be/fRF24LY5pvw
Sep 1, 2018 09:49:14 #
But when the poll is in trumps favour their spot on lol
ACP45 wrote:
Yup, the WAPO poll was really spot on during the last e******n also. Garbage in - Garbage Out!
Sep 1, 2018 10:17:53 #
Lonewolf wrote:
But when the poll is in trumps favour their spot on lol
Depends a lot on who are taking the polls as polls can be pretty deceptive reason I take them as a grain of salt !
No doubt you were over joyed with the polls at the start of the e******n that had Hillary way out in front and was going to win by a landslide !
Sep 1, 2018 10:38:50 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
son of witless wrote:
Days before the e******n Hillary had a 99 % chance of winning. 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sam-wang-princeton-e******n-consortium-poll-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-victory-a7399671.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sam-wang-princeton-e******n-consortium-poll-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-victory-a7399671.html
You know in their defense, they could have mistakenly counted the 57 state's that obama counted too. After all they gobbled up everything he said as progressive gospel.
Sep 1, 2018 10:58:27 #
byronglimish wrote:
You know in their defense, they could have mistakenly counted the 57 state's that obama counted too. After all they gobbled up everything he said as progressive gospel.
The new math. Just like a liberal is what ever g****r he believes he is, their numbers are always what ever they believe them to be.
Sep 1, 2018 11:21:40 #
son of witless wrote:
The new math. Just like a liberal is what ever g****r he believes he is, their numbers are always what ever they believe them to be.
I’ve copied that line for future use!! So true!
Sep 1, 2018 11:30:52 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
son of witless wrote:
The new math. Just like a liberal is what ever g****r he believes he is, their numbers are always what ever they believe them to be.
Sep 1, 2018 13:01:40 #
ACP45 wrote:
Yup, the WAPO poll was really spot on during the last e******n also. Garbage in - Garbage Out!
Yep, garbage is sure in! Can we get that Piece Of Totally Useless S**t out before he does more damage?!?
Sep 1, 2018 13:10:10 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Yep, garbage is sure in! Can we get that Piece Of Totally Useless S**t out before he does more damage?!?
Speaking of the Gay Marxist Anti-Sovereign Republic Community Agitator and enemy of the United States..where is the Kenyan?
Sep 1, 2018 13:23:27 #
The only thing that's going to matter is that evidence when it comes out is going to satisfy a larger number of republicans than the 30% dies hards will believe until it comes out.
A difficulty is that the right has already beat up a lot of what we know about Trump obstructing justice, and the right doesn't see it that way even though a hundred acts are doing exactly that.
The right and Trump seems to think a defense of, "it was said in the open, so it can't be obstruction" flies legally. Try looking at an act of discussing stopping the investigation that was done in secrecy, it would be automatically seen as a crime. Just because it's tweeted, or Giuliani admits something does not change it from being obstruction. Trump is openly sealing a case for obstruction when he openly tweets about wanting Sessions "to protect him", that is not his job. It's not white house counsel's job to facilitate the things Trump wants to do, it's their job to tell him what he cannot do as much as what he can, and he objects to that. He says he wants can do people not you can't do that people.
A difficulty is that the right has already beat up a lot of what we know about Trump obstructing justice, and the right doesn't see it that way even though a hundred acts are doing exactly that.
The right and Trump seems to think a defense of, "it was said in the open, so it can't be obstruction" flies legally. Try looking at an act of discussing stopping the investigation that was done in secrecy, it would be automatically seen as a crime. Just because it's tweeted, or Giuliani admits something does not change it from being obstruction. Trump is openly sealing a case for obstruction when he openly tweets about wanting Sessions "to protect him", that is not his job. It's not white house counsel's job to facilitate the things Trump wants to do, it's their job to tell him what he cannot do as much as what he can, and he objects to that. He says he wants can do people not you can't do that people.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.