no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Written by Wes Walker on August 23, 2018
Dear CNN: B****s Are Taking Land From W****s In South Africa – Is That ‘R****m?’


The Militant Left’s r****m rules are so jacked up that they don’t know how to react to the South Africa story.

The rules that we used to all play by were pretty straightforward. Treating someone differently (better or worse) than someone else for no other reason but skin color or ethnicity was explicitly r****t.

Ah, yes… way back in those far simpler times.

Then someone had the bright idea to connect r****m to Marxism thinking. Now r****m is defined through the filter of power and politics.

The idea that people with power and people in the racial majority could not be r****t. Because they hold power.

Let’s see if that’s just a convenient excuse to beat down America, or if they’re willing to hold up other nations to that same set of rules.

South Africa. There was a long history of problems with Apartheid. We all know that. The fact that they moved past that without triggering a civil war is one of the reasons that people focus more on Nelson Mandela as a national hero, and focus less on the cruelty of his youth. (See: ‘Necklacing’.)

But now, farms that have been in families for generations — including those which had been legally purchased — are being ‘liberated’ from white farmers without compensation. The land is being taken from them.

South Africa’s current head of state, President Cyril Ramaphosa, has been publicly praised earlier this year by no less than Barack Obama.

As Tucker reports, our own State Department is describing their current issue of ‘grappling with land reform’ as an open process with public hearings. They are a ‘strong democracy’ with an ‘independent judiciary’. So — really, move along, there’s no story here.

As one South African writer observed:

Recently, Obama romped on to the Third World stage “bigly.” He delivered an address in this writer’s birthplace of Johannesburg, South Africa. The occasion: the centennial commemoration of Nelson Mandela’s birth.

On that occasion, Obama praised “the liberal international order,” which is founded on inverted morality: Good is bad and bad is good.

Small wonder, then, that nobody—broadcaster Tucker Carlson excepted—was willing to shame Obama for lauding genial thug Cyril Ramaphosa as an inspiration for “new hope in [his] great country.”

President hope-and-change Ramaphosa has gone where his four peer predecessors had not dared to go. He led a wildly fruitful effort to tweak the already watered-down property-rights provision in the South-African Constitution. Theft of land owned by w****s will now be permitted.

Other than their modern-day-messiah status, BHO and his hero Mandela share something else. Both were silent about the systematic ethnic cleansing and extermination, in ways that beggar belief, of South-African farmers, in particular, and w****s in general.

Does the barefaced Barack care that white men, women and children are being butchered like animals, their bodies often displayed like trophies by their proud black assassins?

An example among thousands are Kaalie Botha’s parents: “You can’t k**l an animal like they k**led my mom and dad. You can’t believe it.” The Achilles tendons of Kaalie’s 71-year-old father had been severed by his assailants so he couldn’t flee. He was then hacked in the back until he died, his body dumped in the bush. The head of wife Joey had been bashed in by a brick, wielded with such force that the skull “cracked like an egg.”

A day in the life of farming South Africa. — Source: Constitution

‘An example among thousands’, they said.

Let that thought sink in.

Would this violence be tolerated in silence by any OTHER majority population rising up against a minority? When the minorities being k**led are white, is it suddenly perfectly ok?

Don’t forget — this very same model has been tried before. It turned a once-prosperous Zimbabwe into a modern basket case that eventually relied on the UN to feed one of every four citizens.

Carol Kelly

I’ve been following this. It’s beginning to look a lot like Rhodesia. Guess who is in the works. And no, it’s never ok.

woodguru

No, it's reapropriating the land w****s took away from b****s, and it's being tried to be done in a structured manner...

and if you haven't dug into the details you won't have a clue what the issue is

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

I can feel both Soros and Obamas influence, but I could be wrong, I often am.

Carol Kelly

You and others like you dont have a clue as to the history of South Africa. The b****s were uneducated, living in hovels, the w****s came in and developed the country and brought them up out of their shanties to make them a moving force. Mandela came in with his C*******m and they are now worse off than ever. It’s just a matter of time before they begin the k*****g that took place in Rhodesia. I guess you’ll think they HAVE every right to take white blood to fertilize THEIR LAND. The ignorance of the left is mind boggling. I’m presently reading “A Gentleman in Moscow “. Just the first two chapters would open your mind as to the possibilities you’re desirous of.

Carol Kelly

Not often.

Radiance3

=================
B****s in South Africa are the r****ts against the W****s.
The White people in South Africa came to Africa during the 16th century.
White South Africans - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_South_Africans
White South Africans are South Africans descended from any of the white racial groups of ... The history of European settlement in South Africa started in 1652 with the settlement of the Cape of Good Hope by the Dutch East India ... W****s continue to play a role in the South African economy and across the political spectrum.
Because they are smart and innovative, they acquired and developed huge tracks of land that eventually gave them prosperity.

Currently, the b****s under a black government are k*****g the white people and taking over their lands through violence constantly. Currently there is a violent upheavals between the b****s and the white people in Africa.

he black government created a law that required lands to be confiscated by the b****s from the White people who owned and developed the land since the 1600. Violence and deaths at present are happening, the w****s are persecuted until they give up their lands to the b****s.

Carol Kelly

To repeat myself...it’s Rhodesia all over again. Farmers and families were murdered n their beds and no one lifted a finger to help them. Guess who was involved in that mass homicide. None other than Obama’s father who he aspired to be greater than. I was living in England then and I was appalled at the attitude of the BBC.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

The white farmers should have known better than to think they could live among the black Africans considering the history of their aquisition of African land.

Africa belongs to he who conquers it and is able to hold it.

So if black Africans take back their farmland, I just hope they have sense enough to use it to feed themselves.

Radiance3

================
Likewise the West including Europe belong to the White people. But we allow the b****s and provide them the equal opportunity to achieve. Because black are by nature deficient mentally, the White people gave them additional privileges like the affirmative action where they are given preference in jobs, and education so that they can live in par with the white people.

But what did b****s in Africa do? They k**l the white who've worked hard in their lands thus becoming prosperous than the mentally deficient b****s. So b****s now k**l them and take over their lands.

Lonewolf

Kind of sounds like what w****s did to native Americans k*****g 12 million just about twice as many as Hitler!!

bahmer

I think that you are spot on here.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Quite right, Carol. Additionally, when Soviet Russia desired African natural resources they turned, clandestinely, to the Democratic Party USA and goaded them into taking on the issue of apartheid -- knowing Democrats would overreact without a clear understanding of all the issues. Bowing to severe international sanctions and recriminations, South Africa was not able to continue to incrementally integrate b****s into the democratic process (as they were already in the process of doing) resulting rather in the incremental death of that Nation. Russian influence and Democratic collusion is not a new phenomenon.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

I'm confident you accidentally forgot to mention the primary cause of death for native Americans was thru disease and not the showers or bullets Hitler provided. Hope this helps clear up your oversight. I don't actually know if their population ever reached 12 million.

Lonewolf

And who gave them infected blankets in the winter so they would die of disease
The US army