oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

It is time for a little more of what some would call h********c news and resulting discussion. I think that just a bit too much t***h may be seen here about how gays have operated the past few years in their attempts to further their life style. Of course, most of us don't even know Kirk and Madsen and the methods they have used so well in their gay jihad. The part I like best about them is their making up of words that were never in our vocabulary till the gays got wound out and had a POTUS who would support them in their desire to be accepted. I really like what the author has to say about the unhealthy, filthy practices those people use in their life style.

http://eaglerising.com/5641/gay-jihad-normalized-filthy-practice/

bahmer

Excellent read. I wonder if btfkr will have any comments or brenda devon I am sure that they will all want to chime in and add their two cents.

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

i knew, just as many people that the 'gay agenda' would come to a head in my lifetime. you can only be laughed at, made fun of, sneered at and shunned for so long without all that taking some effect. but all of what i just mentioned iz pure human nature and all these militant q***rs and d**es are trying to 'get even' by imposing that our recent history was all wrong (how is basic human nature wrong?) because mainstream society will not accept their lifestyle because they are not evil. that iz correct but as Pope Francis said...they are not evil, what they do is. it is a lifestyle that WILL NEVER be accepted by most mainstream folks but these militant people will never accept that and for federal judges to 'dictate' to the masses that they are wrong means that this matter has not yet 'come to head' yet and when it does...this will not be pretty.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Speaking of the btfkr, I have to say that only horrible h********c people like us would call that practice filthy.

We used to have some real q***rs here who wouldn't like this article but I haven't heard from them in some time. Maybe they have been submerged and will surface again. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Brian Devon

Roy,

How long have you been a latent homosexual??? Do you enjoy your J. Edgar Hoover cross-dressing catalogues??? Why is this particular topic of such interest to you. If you are such a raging heterosexual, why are you not posting pictures of Christina Hendricks and Sophia Vergara???

You could post on anything........but this is the one you choose??? Really???

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Great discussion of the topic at hand. You do know that you have done nothing but attempt to deflect from that topic, don't you? Did they give you some kind of diploma when you graduated from the Alinsky School of wh**ever?

I am ready to discuss the new words made up by homos to try to make anti-gays back off. Homophobe hasn't been around all that long but it seems to fly for them. Why do you try so hard to deflect attention from articles like this one? Well of course you do know that I consider proglike things like what you have done here to be nothing but an attempt to make those of us of the non-q***r group look as silly as you do.

When will we allow people like you to determine what we want to talk about? Will it be when Kirk and Madsen become the bosses of something?

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

My ears must have been burning. The article is not much more than right wing fear based bulls**t. Look at the title alone, Gay Jihad. OMG give me a break. As if the so called "gay agenda" was to control the world through our own made up religion and laws. LAUGHABLE if some people didn't actually believe it. And some of the adjectives used in the article...ingenious prose, I'll give the author that much. Haven't read the book mentioned and quite frankly don't care to. What would you expect from two"marketing geniuses" as authors. Yes, I read the article best I could but got sooo board of all the bulls**t about halfway through I nearly fell asleep. Believe it if you want boys it's a free country don't you forget that! (That does mean I have my freedoms too)

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I'll bet you really got unhappy when you read the part about how your kind end up suffering from HIV/Aids and like that. How do you people clean up after the "act"?

I am going to have to go back and discover some of those great adjectives since you saw them. Where did the name, homophobe, originate, anyway?

Brian Devon

******
Roy, you really get off on the details, don't you??? You remind me of Roy Cohn, Joe McCarthy's right hand man. He emphatically insisted, to his dying day, that he was not gay........but that he really just preferred to have sex with men.

Are you worried you have no place in this world??? Actually I think you would make a great Catholic priest. I'm sure the church would welcome you with open arms.


BTW, Roy, if you ever do get some pity sex from a woman, you should know a few things about filthy practices. Are you aware that the place you most likely would put your micro-soft appendage is actually an exit for liquid waste??? Did you know that if you violate biblical sodomy prohibitions, and go down on a woman, you are actually putting your tongue on some old pee-pee??? You do realize that if the woman goes down on you...and you spill seed, you are considered an a*********n and God will strike you dead on the spot??? Do you realize that if you ever wanked in your entire life you are already damned to hell.......but you knew that, didn't you???

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Your freedoms as you call it were restricted to the bedroom during the closeted days, weren't they? I have known many q***rs in my day but until the last few years after they decided that victimization worked so well they didn't go around bragging about it. I only ever had one try to "put the moves" on me and after I told him that if he ever tried something like that again I would attempt to beat the life out of him we became good friends, that is until he died with AIDS. That was such a waste of musical talent but he thought his sex views were right.

I read the article twice more and failed to find the adjectives you speak of but maybe you could dig some of them up to display before me.

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

As I recall the article mentioned 3 diseases? HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, and Syph? (sorry not going to read through it all again) Seems straight folks are not immune to any of those last I knew anyway.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/lifestyles/health/older-americans-the-fastest-growing-demographic-fo/nLz3q/

re origin of "homophobe"c&p from wikipedia:
Although sexual attitudes tracing back to Ancient Greece (8th to 6th centuries BC to the end of antiquity (ca. 600 AD)) have been termed homophobia by scholars, the term itself is relatively new.[11] Coined by George Weinberg, a psychologist, in the 1960s,[12] the term homophobia is a blend[13][14][15] of (1) the word homosexual, itself a mix of neo-classical morphemes, and (2) phobia from the Greek φόβος, Phóbos, meaning "fear" or "morbid fear". Weinberg is credited as the first person to have used the term in speech.[11] The word homophobia first appeared in print in an article written for the May 23, 1969, edition of the American pornographic magazine Screw, in which the word was used to refer to heterosexual men's fear that others might think they are gay.[11]

Conceptualizing anti-L**T prejudice as a social problem worthy of scholarly attention was not new. A 1969 article in Time described examples of negative attitudes toward homosexuality as "homophobia", including "a mixture of revulsion and apprehension" which some called homosexual panic.[16] In 1971, Kenneth Smith used homophobia as a personality profile to describe the psychological aversion to homosexuality.[17] Weinberg also used it this way in his 1972 book Society and the Healthy Homosexual,[18] published one year before the American Psychiatric Association v**ed to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders.[19][20] Weinberg's term became an important tool for gay and lesbian activists, advocates, and their allies.[11] He describes the concept as a medical phobia:[18]

[A] phobia about homosexuals.... It was a fear of homosexuals which seemed to be associated with a fear of contagion, a fear of reducing the things one fought for — home and family. It was a religious fear and it had led to great brutality as fear always does.[11]

In 1981, homophobia was used for the first time in The Times (of London) to report that the General Synod of the Church of England v**ed to refuse to condemn homosexuality.[21]

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

It's good to hear you have known and actually been friends with gay folk. Yes, AIDS has taken a lot of talent and good people. Freedom. hmm. I guess the question is, is it really a freedom if it is "restricted" to the bedroom? My story very briefly: I spent the first 40 years of my life trying to deny my sexuality. That DENIAL and dishonesty brought havoc not only to myself but others around me. The last 22 years I have lived honestly and openly as who I am, with very little (or hopefully no) harm to myself or others. "Honest is the best policy", no?

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

that iz correct but lemme ask you a question. should this country's inhabitants now be forced to do things against their beliefs to satisfy the new-age gay agenda when there are other inhabitants who will cater to gays? also, can't you just say...gotta find a woman gotta find a woman, one of the 'but' sisters.

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

The only "gay agenda" I'm aware of is e******y...NOT "special" anything. The only thing I expect is to be treated as any other human being. If I act like a s**t head, I should be treated like a s**t head. If I act like a decent person, I should be treated decently. "Equal but Separate" thinking I personally don't believe is acceptable for any human being. That being said, I can obviously tell when someone would rather not associate with gays. If that be the case, I'm comfortable enough in my own skin that I'd rather not associate with him/her either. If it is a business situation, if they don't want my business, I will gladly go elsewhere. As far as gay activism goes, sometimes it is "over the top". But, on the other hand, I will say, just like civil rights in the 60's, I doubt we would have gotten as far as we have toward a semblance of e******y without it.

Gotta find a woman, gotta find a woman works as good for me as gotta find a man, gotta find a man would work for you. I know, I tried it (though not one of the butt sisters, your words). Butt sisters...that does make me laugh though :XD:

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

No, not unhappy. I've heard it all. Perhaps a little sad for some I have known over the years.
Oh yeah, maybe not so much just adjectives so much a phrases or even "catch phrases" if you will that I actually found funny. I get a minute or 2 I'll go back and toss some back.