Trump and his Obstruction of Justice: Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that implicates Trump in obstruction of justice Ian Reifowitz Tuesday July 31, 2018

Richard94611

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that implicates Trump in obstruction of justice

Ian Reifowitz

Tuesday July 31, 2018 · 9:56 AM PDT

This is from reporter Murray Waas, and it is a frickin’ bombshell:

Previously undisclosed evidence in the possession of Special Counsel Robert Mueller—including highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trump’s own top aides—provides some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice. Several people who have reviewed a portion of this evidence say that, based on what they know, they believe it is now all but inevitable that the special counsel will complete a confidential report presenting evidence that President Trump violated the law.

You may remember that on Feb. 14, 2017, Trump asked then-FBI director James Comey to let former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn off the hook. Flynn ultimately pled guilty to lying to the FBI, and is cooperating with the Mueller investigation into Trump and Russia. Comey has stated under oath that Trump said: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

Back to Waas:

I have learned that a confidential White House memorandum, which is in the special counsel’s possession, explicitly states that when Trump pressured Comey he had just been told by two of his top aides—his then chief of staff Reince Priebus and his White House counsel Don McGahn—that Flynn was under criminal investigation.

In arguing in their January 29 letter that Trump did not obstruct justice, the president’s attorneys Dowd and Sekulow quoted selectively from this same memo, relying only on a few small portions of it. They also asserted that even if Trump knew there had been an FBI investigation of Flynn, Trump believed that Flynn had been cleared. Full review of the memo flatly contradicts this story.

There’s far more detail in the article. Waas explains the memo’s acknowledgment that Trump knew Flynn was still in the investigative crosshairs of the FBI, and thus that his ‘request’ to Comey likely represented obstruction of justice. This is backed up by Reince Preibus’s own notes, which he wrote just after he talked to Trump about it, as well as by what McGahn told his subordinates. Waas has seen all this material with his own eyes. He also states that other sources of his have told him that both Preibus and McGahn “confirmed in separate interviews” with Mueller’s team that they informed Mr. Popular V**e Loser that Flynn was being investigated by the FBI prior to the February 14, 2017 conversation with Comey.

Holy. Fucking. ***t.

Ian Reifowitz is the author of Obama’s America: A T***sformative Vision of Our National Identity (Potomac Books).

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Richard94611 wrote:

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that implicates Trump in obstruction of justice

Ian Reifowitz

Tuesday July 31, 2018 · 9:56 AM PDT

This is from reporter Murray Waas, and it is a frickin’ bombshell:

Previously undisclosed evidence in the possession of Special Counsel Robert Mueller—including highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trump’s own top aides—provides some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice. Several people who have reviewed a portion of this evidence say that, based on what they know, they believe it is now all but inevitable that the special counsel will complete a confidential report presenting evidence that President Trump violated the law.

You may remember that on Feb. 14, 2017, Trump asked then-FBI director James Comey to let former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn off the hook. Flynn ultimately pled guilty to lying to the FBI, and is cooperating with the Mueller investigation into Trump and Russia. Comey has stated under oath that Trump said: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

Back to Waas:

I have learned that a confidential White House memorandum, which is in the special counsel’s possession, explicitly states that when Trump pressured Comey he had just been told by two of his top aides—his then chief of staff Reince Priebus and his White House counsel Don McGahn—that Flynn was under criminal investigation.

In arguing in their January 29 letter that Trump did not obstruct justice, the president’s attorneys Dowd and Sekulow quoted selectively from this same memo, relying only on a few small portions of it. They also asserted that even if Trump knew there had been an FBI investigation of Flynn, Trump believed that Flynn had been cleared. Full review of the memo flatly contradicts this story.

There’s far more detail in the article. Waas explains the memo’s acknowledgment that Trump knew Flynn was still in the investigative crosshairs of the FBI, and thus that his ‘request’ to Comey likely represented obstruction of justice. This is backed up by Reince Preibus’s own notes, which he wrote just after he talked to Trump about it, as well as by what McGahn told his subordinates. Waas has seen all this material with his own eyes. He also states that other sources of his have told him that both Preibus and McGahn “confirmed in separate interviews” with Mueller’s team that they informed Mr. Popular V**e Loser that Flynn was being investigated by the FBI prior to the February 14, 2017 conversation with Comey.

Holy. Fucking. ***t.

Ian Reifowitz is the author of Obama’s America: A T***sformative Vision of Our National Identity (Potomac Books).

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that impl... (show quote)

Still not obstruction. Get a clue!

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Richard94611 wrote:

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that implicates Trump in obstruction of justice

Ian Reifowitz

Tuesday July 31, 2018 · 9:56 AM PDT

This is from reporter Murray Waas, and it is a frickin’ bombshell:

Previously undisclosed evidence in the possession of Special Counsel Robert Mueller—including highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trump’s own top aides—provides some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice. Several people who have reviewed a portion of this evidence say that, based on what they know, they believe it is now all but inevitable that the special counsel will complete a confidential report presenting evidence that President Trump violated the law.

You may remember that on Feb. 14, 2017, Trump asked then-FBI director James Comey to let former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn off the hook. Flynn ultimately pled guilty to lying to the FBI, and is cooperating with the Mueller investigation into Trump and Russia. Comey has stated under oath that Trump said: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

Back to Waas:

I have learned that a confidential White House memorandum, which is in the special counsel’s possession, explicitly states that when Trump pressured Comey he had just been told by two of his top aides—his then chief of staff Reince Priebus and his White House counsel Don McGahn—that Flynn was under criminal investigation.

In arguing in their January 29 letter that Trump did not obstruct justice, the president’s attorneys Dowd and Sekulow quoted selectively from this same memo, relying only on a few small portions of it. They also asserted that even if Trump knew there had been an FBI investigation of Flynn, Trump believed that Flynn had been cleared. Full review of the memo flatly contradicts this story.

There’s far more detail in the article. Waas explains the memo’s acknowledgment that Trump knew Flynn was still in the investigative crosshairs of the FBI, and thus that his ‘request’ to Comey likely represented obstruction of justice. This is backed up by Reince Preibus’s own notes, which he wrote just after he talked to Trump about it, as well as by what McGahn told his subordinates. Waas has seen all this material with his own eyes. He also states that other sources of his have told him that both Preibus and McGahn “confirmed in separate interviews” with Mueller’s team that they informed Mr. Popular V**e Loser that Flynn was being investigated by the FBI prior to the February 14, 2017 conversation with Comey.

Holy. Fucking. ***t.

Ian Reifowitz is the author of Obama’s America: A T***sformative Vision of Our National Identity (Potomac Books).

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that impl... (show quote)

Guess what? Flynn was bait. You're in for a nasty surprise.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

BigMike wrote:

Guess what? Flynn was bait. You're in for a nasty surprise.

Just a waiting.

Richard94611

Here are some clues for you, nwtk2007. Here are just 50 of the 4229 lies Trump has told while in office, some of which amount to attempts to obstruct justice. Your hero Trump is quite a guy ! If the word "lie" didn't exist, we would have to invent it to describe Trump and his actions.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Still not obstruction. Get a clue!

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

nwtk2007 wrote:

Just a waiting.

No hurry now. The trap has worked. The mid-terms are coming. Trump has the ability to declassify more stuff in a timely fashion to advantage our cause. The Dems have to hope, a) Mewler gets Trump, b) they have to win the House and Senate and c) impeach Trump and remove him from office.

If they don't accomplish all three they're doomed...maybe for years.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Richard94611 wrote:

Here are some clues for you, nwtk2007. Here are just 50 of the 4229 lies Trump has told while in office, some of which amount to attempts to obstruct justice. Your hero Trump is quite a guy ! If the word "lie" didn't exist, we would have to invent it to describe Trump and his actions.

We don't care.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Richard94611 wrote:

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that implicates Trump in obstruction of justice

Ian Reifowitz

Tuesday July 31, 2018 · 9:56 AM PDT

This is from reporter Murray Waas, and it is a frickin’ bombshell:

Previously undisclosed evidence in the possession of Special Counsel Robert Mueller—including highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trump’s own top aides—provides some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice. Several people who have reviewed a portion of this evidence say that, based on what they know, they believe it is now all but inevitable that the special counsel will complete a confidential report presenting evidence that President Trump violated the law.

You may remember that on Feb. 14, 2017, Trump asked then-FBI director James Comey to let former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn off the hook. Flynn ultimately pled guilty to lying to the FBI, and is cooperating with the Mueller investigation into Trump and Russia. Comey has stated under oath that Trump said: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

Back to Waas:

I have learned that a confidential White House memorandum, which is in the special counsel’s possession, explicitly states that when Trump pressured Comey he had just been told by two of his top aides—his then chief of staff Reince Priebus and his White House counsel Don McGahn—that Flynn was under criminal investigation.

In arguing in their January 29 letter that Trump did not obstruct justice, the president’s attorneys Dowd and Sekulow quoted selectively from this same memo, relying only on a few small portions of it. They also asserted that even if Trump knew there had been an FBI investigation of Flynn, Trump believed that Flynn had been cleared. Full review of the memo flatly contradicts this story.

There’s far more detail in the article. Waas explains the memo’s acknowledgment that Trump knew Flynn was still in the investigative crosshairs of the FBI, and thus that his ‘request’ to Comey likely represented obstruction of justice. This is backed up by Reince Preibus’s own notes, which he wrote just after he talked to Trump about it, as well as by what McGahn told his subordinates. Waas has seen all this material with his own eyes. He also states that other sources of his have told him that both Preibus and McGahn “confirmed in separate interviews” with Mueller’s team that they informed Mr. Popular V**e Loser that Flynn was being investigated by the FBI prior to the February 14, 2017 conversation with Comey.

Holy. Fucking. ***t.

Ian Reifowitz is the author of Obama’s America: A T***sformative Vision of Our National Identity (Potomac Books).

Murray Waas reports Mueller has evidence that impl... (show quote)

My God!!!!!!Get an effing clue..Asking somebody to get a person off the hook, especially if a person said please is not an obstruction...Was it good idea for President to say that??Probably not,but did he obstructed justice???Absolutely NOT!!!

Richard94611

Big Mike, you don't care ? That's exactly the point. What kind of shriveled sense of ethics do you have ?

BigMike wrote:

We don't care.

Richard94611

You mean "Absolutely."

proud republican wrote:

My God!!!!!!Get an effing clue..Asking somebody to get a person off the hook, especially if a person said please is not an obstruction...Was it good idea for President to say that??Probably not,but did he obstructed justice???Absolutely NOT!!!

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Richard94611 wrote:

You mean "Absolutely."

NO!!!...I mean ABSOLUTELY!!!!!

Richard94611

BigMike, the more stuff Trump declassifies stuff, the tighter the noose around his neck becomes. If he were really smart, he would shut up. But he isn't. You don't care if Trump has been caught in 4229 lies and misrepresentations ? Then we need to consider you "morally challenged."

BigMike wrote:

No hurry now. The trap has worked. The mid-terms are coming. Trump has the ability to declassify more stuff in a timely fashion to advantage our cause. The Dems have to hope, a) Mewler gets Trump, b) they have to win the House and Senate and c) impeach Trump and remove him from office.

If they don't accomplish all three they're doomed...maybe for years.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Richard94611 wrote:

BigMike, the more stuff Trump declassifies stuff, the tighter the noose around his neck becomes. If he were really smart, he would shut up. But he isn't. You don't care if Trump has been caught in 4229 lies and misrepresentations ? Then we need to consider you "morally challenged."

You mean there is actually a job for somebody to count how many times President TRUMP lied???Then this person should thank a President for giving him/her a job....

See??Its true President Trump is creating jobs for low IQ people to count numbers....Maybe Maxiepad Waters should apply....

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

Richard94611 wrote:

Big Mike, you don't care ? That's exactly the point. What kind of shriveled sense of ethics do you have ?

Just reading his posts, I believe his ethics told him that the habitual liar Hillary Clinton was a hundred times the liar of Trump. So, he could only v**e for the good businessman with the gonads to start draining the swamp and talking with our enemies to stop their threats of nuclear war with us. Good thinking, Big Mike!

Richard94611

Trump draining the swamp ? You are kidding yourself. Besides, this is about Trump, not about Hillary. Get over the Hillary bit. That's water over the dam. Concentrate on what is going on now.

Trooper745 wrote:

Just reading his posts, I believe his ethics told him that the habitual liar Hillary Clinton was a hundred times the liar of Trump. So, he could only v**e for the good businessman with the gonads to start draining the swamp and talking with our enemies to stop their threats of nuclear war with us. Good thinking, Big Mike!