Idaho wrote:
Sorry, No. that’s just cherry picking and trolling to say that. You have obviously been getting your news from the Mockingbird channels.
If you actually watched the press conference yourself, what you would have seen was brilliant statescraft. Trump secured an invitation for the Mueller investigation to go to Russia to interview the indicted Russians and view the evidence, and in exchange Russia wants to send their investigation team over to interview suspects in a massive money laundering operation that extracted $1.5 Billion of illegal proceeds from Russia and which paid $400million to the Clinton campaign.
Putin has also pledged cooperation on fighting international crime.
Anyone who tries to claim our alphabet agencies are whiter than fresh fallen snow, has deliberately closed their eyes to all the clues over the years on their involvement in false f**g operations at home and abroad.
The backlash happening now in the media looks like cornered rats making their last stand.
Sorry, No. that’s just cherry picking and trolling... (
show quote)
I watched the entire press conference. It was humiliating for Trump and even more so for America.
Indeed, why put all your eggs in one basket.... there will come a time when they will need an ace in the hole. I think Russia has more dirt on Clintons (meaning K**lary, Bill and their daughter) and they are biding their time for the exact right moment..... perhaps for midterm e******ns or 2020. Especially if rumors are right and she will campaign again.
Bad Bob wrote:
Ya think if Russia had dirt on Clinton, they held it back???
Pennylynn wrote:
Indeed, why put all your eggs in one basket.... there will come a time when they will need an ace in the hole. I think Russia has more dirt on Clintons (meaning K**lary, Bill and their daughter) and they are biding their time for the exact right moment..... perhaps for midterm e******ns or 2020. Especially if rumors are right and she will campaign again.
Maybe so. Does that make it "okay" that they have dirt on Trump?
Tgards79 wrote:
Maybe so. Does that make it "okay" that they have dirt on Trump?
"Maybe so. Does that make it "okay" that they have dirt on Trump?" - Tgards
Thanks for asking, Tgards.
(paraphrase)
"The anti Trump group tries to convince Americans that Trump having mutually consensual sex with playmates or porn stars is so morally repulsive that we would rather have an anti American pro NWO government than a man who is putting America first and succeeding beyond all expectations.
We are told that we should rather live in a borderless one government world with Islam as the preferred religion rather than tolerate a man who has sex with pretty women. Barack Hussein Obama has never done that, certainly."
The choice is easy. Most Americans are prioritizing. America comes first
An easy choice
It will be in 2020 also.
Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA
Tgards79 wrote:
I watched the entire press conference. It was humiliating for Trump and even more so for America.
If you heard the presser with the jaded hearing of a l*****t or never Trumper, you heard craziness. But ;
I was listening to Larry Elder yesterday afternoon. He was playing clips of Trumps statements and then reading the headlines and press comments his comments generated. What an eye opener. Larry's final comment: ok, so who is lying here?? Who is twisting the t***h??
If they have dirt on President Trump, I am sure it was already bought by Democrats and then dismissed as not damning enough right now to use. If you think about the campaign... Clinton pulled out every bit of garbage that could be found; tapes, hookers, bankruptcies, nonpayment of wages, the Khan people, .... but, President Trump did not dig for dirt, he let her own words take her down, her very own emails. And then her own words, calling people deplorable (which I think was the last nail). Sure he called for her to be tried/jailed, but not once did he pay for dirt, or if he did he kept it to himself. Instead he drummed home the email server issue, which we leaned was much worse than what Comey said. Actual "Secret" information was sent over this server and did get into hands of countries outside of the US (probably NK and most certainly Russia). K**lary actually paid to have an unverifiable dossier created. Further, it seems that they employed Alexander Nix, the CEO of Cambridge Analytica who bragged his
operatives would never be caught because they worked all over the world using a number of front organizations. It is possible that there is more dirt his people found or created on both candidates.... But, I do not see how anything worse than what was already made available, certtainly nothing to topple the faith that many now have in President Trump. But, what if.....they have some earth shattering info on the Democrats as a whole, how long willl it take for the party to live it down? My guess, well after President Trumps second term in office. It could even be made available for consideration right before midterms.
Tgards79 wrote:
Maybe so. Does that make it "okay" that they have dirt on Trump?
Pennylynn wrote:
If they have dirt on President Trump, I am sure it was already bought by Democrats and then dismissed as not damning enough right now to use. If you think about the campaign... Clinton pulled out every bit of garbage that could be found; tapes, hookers, bankruptcies, nonpayment of wages, the Khan people, .... but, President Trump did not dig for dirt, he let her own words take her down, her very own emails. And then her own words, calling people deplorable (which I think was the last nail). Sure he called for her to be tried/jailed, but not once did he pay for dirt, or if he did he kept it to himself. Instead he drummed home the email server issue, which we leaned was much worse than what Comey said. Actual "Secret" information was sent over this server and did get into hands of countries outside of the US (probably NK and most certainly Russia). K**lary actually paid to have an unverifiable dossier created. Further, it seems that they employed Alexander Nix, the CEO of Cambridge Analytica who bragged his
operatives would never be caught because they worked all over the world using a number of front organizations. It is possible that there is more dirt his people found or created on both candidates.... But, I do not see how anything worse than what was already made available, certtainly nothing to topple the faith that many now have in President Trump. But, what if.....they have some earth shattering info on the Democrats as a whole, how long willl it take for the party to live it down? My guess, well after President Trumps second term in office. It could even be made available for consideration right before midterms.
If they have dirt on President Trump, I am sure it... (
show quote)
The funny thing is; while the Dems were digging for dirt on Trump and his campaign; they dug up a ton of it on themselves.
The only thing that has keept the Dems afloat, is the complicity of their Lame Stream Media.
eagleye13 wrote:
The funny thing is; while the Dems were digging for dirt on Trump and his campaign; they dug up a ton of it on themselves.
The only thing that has keept the Dems afloat, is the complicity of their Lame Stream Media.
And the fact that Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, et al are all democrats!
buffalo wrote:
And the fact that Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, et al are all democrats!
Aren't they all repug/rino's??
nwtk2007 wrote:
Aren't they all repug/rino's??
Do you think they are all unbiased with no agenda?
buffalo wrote:
Do you think they are all unbiased with no agenda?
Which "they" are you referring to??
nwtk2007 wrote:
Which "they" are you referring to??
The they you asked, " Aren't they all repug/rino's??"
buffalo wrote:
The they you asked, " Aren't they all repug/rino's??"
Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein?? They are all republicans. And yes, they all have a never Trump agenda.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.