I spoke to Hitler...
I spoke to Hitler about his genocide and he said he didn't do it though he would be happy to have his intelligent agencies work with ours to prove just who did!
Yup!
PeterS wrote:
I spoke to Hitler about his genocide and he said he didn't do it though he would be happy to have his intelligent agencies work with ours to prove just who did!
Yup!
Delusional and pointless, F*****t Pete.
PeterS wrote:
I spoke to Hitler about his genocide and he said he didn't do it though he would be happy to have his intelligent agencies work with ours to prove just who did!
Yup!
If that was in reference to the Katyn forest massacre, you would have been smart to have taken him up on the offer.
Politics is only black and white in the movies and in propaganda (I guess that's redundant, sorry). If politics is being portrayed as unambiguous, look for the agenda. You will always be able to find one if you dig deep enough.
PeterS wrote:
I spoke to Hitler about his genocide and he said he didn't do it though he would be happy to have his intelligent agencies work with ours to prove just who did!
Yup!
Just tune back two weeks when you & your ilk were asking whether Trump would confront Putin about the allegations on those indictments. So he did and he says he believes him. So you swine now pull this. FYI, we have far more basis on which to think Putin is telling the t***h than we ever could have with Hillary.
How's that? Respond, for once.
Putin denied knowledge of Russia interfering with the 2016 P**********l e******n. He may be telling the t***h. It has been done many times before by other leaders (ours included). It's called plausible deniability. The leader tells his people just do it, but don't tell me about it.
As you can see it makes no difference at all to his base of support..
crazylibertarian wrote:
Just tune back two weeks when you & your ilk were asking whether Trump would confront Putin about the allegations on those indictments. So he did and he says he believes him. So you swine now pull this. FYI, we have far more basis on which to think Putin is telling the t***h than we ever could have with Hillary.
How's that? Respond, for once.
Amen brother and amen
You hit the nail on the head and drove it all the way in the board.
Kickaha wrote:
Putin denied knowledge of Russia interfering with the 2016 P**********l e******n. He may be telling the t***h. It has been done many times before by other leaders (ours included). It's called plausible deniability. The leader tells his people just do it, but don't tell me about it.
It was proved it was rouge Russians on their own buying adds on face book and other media placing misleading adds.
I doubt seriously it effected anyone's V****G choice. Just another excuse for being rejected by the v**ers. I also doubt they can come up with any new excuses for losing.
EconomistDon wrote:
Delusional and pointless, F*****t Pete.
Still projecting eh Donnie. Still don't know that F*****m is a RW trait and Marxism is a LW trait. So if I'm a F*****t are you now a Marxist? Should I start calling you Comrade Donnie? I'll give it a try in any future discourse. By they way, have you learned any economics yet? Every time you spew anything about economics it always includes some garbage about supply side. You do understand that there is more to economics then a failed economic theory that has added trillions of dollars to our national debt! Have you see our national debt since Reagan introduced his failed economic theory? If I'm not mistaken if you add trillions of dollars to government spending via added debt the economy should grow or at least be propped up and not collapse until it could do nothing else?! Is that not true? So how do you know the difference between growth introduced via an economy propped up by debt and that by an improved economy because of your theory?
You're an economist Don. Shouldn't you be able to answer that question?
proud republican wrote:
I spoke with him too and he wants Obama back....Wh... (
show quote)
PR, have you ever answered why you support a f*****t in Putin and Trump? Why would you leave Russia if you were simply going to support the worst that it has to offer? You've seen the worst that authoritarianism and the first thing you do here is embrace it with both of your arms! Could you not see that Totalitarianism and Authoritarianism the same repressive form of government? How sad for you and you don't even know what you've done...
PeterS, It was the fault of both the US and Germany. In fact, it could have been anybody.
PeterS wrote:
I spoke to Hitler about his genocide and he said he didn't do it though he would be happy to have his intelligent agencies work with ours to prove just who did!
Yup!
PeterS wrote:
Still projecting eh Donnie. Still don't know that F*****m is a RW trait and Marxism is a LW trait. So if I'm a F*****t are you now a Marxist? Should I start calling you Comrade Donnie? I'll give it a try in any future discourse. By they way, have you learned any economics yet? Every time you spew anything about economics it always includes some garbage about supply side. You do understand that there is more to economics then a failed economic theory that has added trillions of dollars to our national debt! Have you see our national debt since Reagan introduced his failed economic theory? If I'm not mistaken if you add trillions of dollars to government spending via added debt the economy should grow or at least be propped up and not collapse until it could do nothing else?! Is that not true? So how do you know the difference between growth introduced via an economy propped up by debt and that by an improved economy because of your theory?
You're an economist Don. Shouldn't you be able to answer that question?
Still projecting eh Donnie. Still don't know that ... (
show quote)
By your logic, F*****t Pete, Obama's economy should have been the most robust of our lifetime. The Fed, through Quantitative Easing, QE2, QE3, and QE forever, was pounding $85 Billion into the economy each month at its peak in 2015. But the result was a tepid expansion, the weakest recovery since the Great Depression. What they and you fail to understand, is that economic recovery can't be "bought". Yes, "supply side" works!!! Business must be given the opportunity to succeed. Business cannot thrive under onerous regulations and high taxes. Reagan proved this and now Trump is proving it. Obama's administration piled on 3000 new regulations that stifled business, and compounded it with the sixth highest corporate tax rate in the world. Trump fixed both problems and jobs are growing again. Factory jobs are returning to America providing good-paying jobs for middle-class workers. The attached chart shows factory jobs as reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
BTW, f*****m ALWAYS grows out of socialism/Marxism. It NEVER grows out of capitalism. For a good example of how socialism d**gs down an economy, read about Argentina, a once powerful economy in the 1950s. Socialism ruined their economy, and it drifted into f*****m under Juan Peron. Or, look at your favorite N**is (National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party).
EconomistDon wrote:
By your logic, F*****t Pete, Obama's economy should have been the most robust of our lifetime. The Fed, through Quantitative Easing, QE2, QE3, and QE forever, was pounding $85 Billion into the economy each month at its peak in 2015. But the result was a tepid expansion, the weakest recovery since the Great Depression. What they and you fail to understand, is that economic recovery can't be "bought". Yes, "supply side" works!!! Business must be given the opportunity to succeed. Business cannot thrive under onerous regulations and high taxes. Reagan proved this and now Trump is proving it. Obama's administration piled on 3000 new regulations that stifled business, and compounded it with the sixth highest corporate tax rate in the world. Trump fixed both problems and jobs are growing again. Factory jobs are returning to America providing good-paying jobs for middle-class workers. The attached chart shows factory jobs as reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
BTW, f*****m ALWAYS grows out of socialism/Marxism. It NEVER grows out of capitalism. For a good example of how socialism d**gs down an economy, read about Argentina, a once powerful economy in the 1950s. Socialism ruined their economy, and it drifted into f*****m under Juan Peron. Or, look at your favorite N**is (National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party).
By your logic, F*****t Pete, Obama's economy shoul... (
show quote)
So that's it C****e Don? And Germany was a democracy before it became F*****t C****e Don. Do you understand nothing of history? Oh, I see--you think that ploy of being socialist means Germany embraced Socialism before becoming fully authoritarian. God, you are lost in space C****e Don. There wasn't a damn thing socialistic about the National Socialist Party other than they were a bunch of thugs who did their damnedest to destroy the democracy that Germany was at the time.
And I wasn't talking about labor growth but the growth in debt accompanied by EVERY tax cut ever put through by you supply-sider's. I mean anytime you prime the pump the economy will expand. I know that so I'm not arguing that. Don't be John Maynard C****e Don. My question is how can you cut taxes and have the growth pay for itself so that we are not swallowed up by debt? You claim to be the economic genius on this board so explain how you can have supply--side economics and not the resulting MOUNTAIN of debt? Stick to the topic C****e Don and stop trying to show me what I didn't ask for~!
saltwind 78 wrote:
PeterS, It was the fault of both the US and Germany. In fact, it could have been anybody.
So True. I'll bet it was the Navajo Indians who started the whole thing...the blinking red light that it was...you know, red skins that is...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.