Tainted Trust
Jul 11, 2018 14:47:52 #
glibona
Loc: Nevada
Believe its not so much that most here on OPPS don't want to be optimistic about the latest Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh - nor have confidence that he will interpret the Constitution as it is intended.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
Jul 11, 2018 15:25:34 #
no propaganda please
Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
glibona wrote:
Believe its not so much that most here on OPPS don't want to be optimistic about the latest Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh - nor have confidence that he will interpret the Constitution as it is intended.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
It would concern me more about the socialist connections of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who at 85 is probably not long before retirement.
You may not want a judge who interprets the Constitution according to what the founders wrote and meant, not the New Deal distortions of the socialists. However, that is just the kind that NEEDS to be on the court.
Jul 11, 2018 15:39:36 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
glibona wrote:
Believe its not so much that most here on OPPS don't want to be optimistic about the latest Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh - nor have confidence that he will interpret the Constitution as it is intended.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
However, considering the political activism of some SC conservative judges - trust may be a little tainted. Therefore, cautious optimism may be warranted.
Unfortunately, anyone who has made a career out of partisan and ideological agendas, cannot be trusted to avoid re-interpreting the Constitution according to the same.
It is pointless to have hearings or trials..................when the conclusions have been decided beforehand. Why else are so many people convinced that a new conservative court - would overturn previous decisions? The answer is.................that's exactly what they expect from partisan operatives.
Jul 11, 2018 15:42:30 #
glibona
Loc: Nevada
lpnmajor wrote:
Unfortunately, anyone who has made a career out of partisan and ideological agendas, cannot be trusted to avoid re-interpreting the Constitution according to the same.
It is pointless to have hearings or trials..................when the conclusions have been decided beforehand. Why else are so many people convinced that a new conservative court - would overturn previous decisions? The answer is.................that's exactly what they expect from partisan operatives.
It is pointless to have hearings or trials..................when the conclusions have been decided beforehand. Why else are so many people convinced that a new conservative court - would overturn previous decisions? The answer is.................that's exactly what they expect from partisan operatives.
I see your point.
Jul 11, 2018 15:52:15 #
Jul 11, 2018 17:50:46 #
no propaganda please wrote:
It would concern me more about the socialist connections of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who at 85 is probably not long before retirement.
You may not want a judge who interprets the Constitution according to what the founders wrote and meant, not the New Deal distortions of the socialists. However, that is just the kind that NEEDS to be on the court.
You may not want a judge who interprets the Constitution according to what the founders wrote and meant, not the New Deal distortions of the socialists. However, that is just the kind that NEEDS to be on the court.
I'm concerned about that and the connections between her brain cells too.
Jul 12, 2018 14:15:07 #
GmanTerry wrote:
I read that Abraham Lincoln regretted appointing Ginsburg to the Supreme Court. 
Semper Fi
Semper Fi
Good one!
Jul 12, 2018 15:48:11 #
Jul 12, 2018 16:29:18 #
lpnmajor wrote:
Unfortunately, anyone who has made a career out of partisan and ideological agendas, cannot be trusted to avoid re-interpreting the Constitution according to the same.
It is pointless to have hearings or trials..................when the conclusions have been decided beforehand. Why else are so many people convinced that a new conservative court - would overturn previous decisions? The answer is.................that's exactly what they expect from partisan operatives.
It is pointless to have hearings or trials..................when the conclusions have been decided beforehand. Why else are so many people convinced that a new conservative court - would overturn previous decisions? The answer is.................that's exactly what they expect from partisan operatives.
They expect it because that's what they would...and they'd crow about it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.