Trump word for word:

“I have broken more Elton John records. He seems to have a lot of records. And I, by the way, I don’t have a musical instrument. I don’t have a guitar or an organ. No organ. Elton has an organ. And lots of other people helping. No, we’ve broken a lot of records. We’ve broken virtually every record. Because you know, look, I only need this space. They need much more room. For basketball, for hockey and all of the sports, they need a lot of room. We don’t need it. We have people in that space. So we break all of these records. Really, we do it without, like, the musical instruments. This is the only musical – the mouth. And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth, right? The brain. More important than the mouth is the brain. The brain is much more important.”

Brain doctor: President Trump may be suffering from a ‘degenerative brain disorder’
AOL.COM EDITORS
Dec 11th 2017 6:45PM

For years -- perhaps even decades, Donald Trump has been known for being brash, outspoken and easily confrontational. Those traits have been criticized by some and applauded by many as part of his frank and no-nonsense approach to his career and life in the White House.

But a doctor who specializes in brain injury medicine has suggested in a new article that those very behaviors could indicate that the president suffers from a “degenerative brain disorder" and that he should be tested.

“I see worrisome symptoms that fall into three main categories: problems with language and executive function; problems with social cognition and behavior; and problems with memory, attention, and concentration,” Dr. Ford Vox wrote in a piece published by the medical news site STAT last week.

Vox names a series of specific examples from his time on the campaign trail and in office as signs of a bigger medical problem, including fragmented and repetitive speech patterns, the battles he engaged some Gold Star families in -- and even his regular claim that millions of illegal v**es were cast for rival Hillary Clinton, which has not been substantiated by any reputable reporting.


"I see worrisome symptoms that fall into three main categories: problems with language and executive function; problems with social cognition and behavior; and problems with memory, attention, and concentration," he writes. "None of these are symptoms of being a bad or mean person. Nor do they require spelunking into the depths of his psyche to understand. Instead, they raise concern for a neurocognitive disease process in the same sense that wheezing raises the alarm for asthma."

"It’s time to discuss these issues in a clinical context…even if the president has a physical exam early next year and releases the records, as announced by the White House, what he really needs is thorough cognitive testing,” he continues.

He also acknowledges that the evidence provided is not sufficient for a diagnosis, which is why he advocates testing.



SEE MORE: White House announces physical exam for Trump after slurred speech

"It’s entirely possible that the president does not have predementia or is not progressing toward dementia. But he is definitely behaving as such," he adds.

Vox joins a small, but growing chorus of medical experts who have spoke out about the president's behavior in clinical terms.

Psychiatrist Bandy X. Lee has written two editorials on the matter in the past weeks, one for NBC and another in The New York Times, stressing the need for medical testing in both instances.

“Trump has already exceeded our usual threshold for evaluation," Lee claimed in his piece for NBC.

Mark E Andersen


"Republicans only care about the rich" - George W. Andersen (1923-1999) -

Community
Sunday July 01, 2018 · 10:30 AM PDT
Recommend 244 Share 2390 Tweet 182 Comments 182 new

R****t-in-chief
RSS
PUBLISHED TO
Mark E. Andersen (Kodiak54)
Daily Kos
Daily Kos Liberation League
TAGS
DanRather
DonaldTrump
Share this article

When I was a kid, my dad would tell tales of his growing up during the Great Depression and World War II. He often wondered how the people of Germany could have fallen for a Hitler and his philosophy of h**e. Growing up, I always wondered that as well. How could so many people have fallen for it?

Watching what has been happening over the last few years here in the United States, I now understand how the N**i party rose to power: the German people fell for a con man who knew where to place the blame for the nation’s problems. That blame was aimed squarely at people perceived as different.

Fast forward to Make America Great Again: can you smell the r****m in that slogan? With a black man in the White House, Donald Trump could use r****m as a keystone in his campaign, and he did. Make America Great Again by electing a h**eful old white man. On the campaign trail, Trump did not hide his r****m.

JUNE 16, 2015

When Trump announced his campaign for president

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems …They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.”

DEC. 7, 2015

At a South Carolina rally five days after the San Bernardino terrorist attack

Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what the hell is going on.”

FEB. 28, 2016

CNN interview

“Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke, okay? I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with w***e s*******y or w***e s*********ts. So I don’t know.”

JUNE 3, 2016h

Pointing to a black man surrounded by white Trump supporters at a campaign rally in Redding

“Look at my African American over here. Look at him.”

SEPT. 22, 2016

P**********l debate with Hillary Clinton

“Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.”

Those are just the high points (or low points) of the Trump campaign. That alone tells you that people were comfortable v****g for an openly r****t candidate.

Should it come as any surprise that the people who v**ed for Trump are okay with separating children from their parents, and blocking members of one religion from entering the country? That they are okay with the naked r****m we see every single day in this country?

Someday, the photos, and words will come back to haunt those who have supported this r****t president. They will regret their choice—but they will never admit it.

LEESBURG, VA - NOVEMBER 07: Supporters cheer for Republican p**********l nominee Donald Trump during a campaign rally at the Loudoun County Fairgrounds in the early morning hours on November 7, 2016 in Leesburg, Virginia. With less than 48 hours until E******n Day in the United States, Trump and his opponent, Democratic p**********l nominee Hillary Clinton, are campaigning in key battleground states that each must win to take the White House. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
But her e-mails...
As a kid, when my dad told me the stories of how the N**is rose to power in Germany, I wondered how it could have happened. In high school and college, I wondered if I would have been duped by a two-bit con man. Would I have followed orders? Would I have followed the pack? Today, I know the answer: no way, never in a million years. Even if Trump had run as a Democrat and agreed with me on the issues (or said he did), I would not have v**ed for him. He is a vile, r****t human being. He sold our country out to Russia for the presidency. He does not give a s**t about America, or its people. He will use and abuse whoever he can to get wh**ever he wants.

History is written by the victors, and the history books will not be kind to him. How do I know this? I will let Dan Rather answer that question:
Dan Rather
June 27 at 3:39 PM ·

For decades, Republicans have been able to have it all ways. Promise a radical reactionary rethink of American democracy to their rabid base, and hide behind a court that protected them from what would be a very unpopular set of policies with the general public. Well no longer.

Do we really want to outlaw a******n? We may soon know. Do we really believe we can attack gay rights and other rights at unprecedented levels? We may soon know. Do we really believe that our corporations should have unfettered power and workers have relatively none? Here again, the movement is already afoot.

The farce is shattered, the fig leaf has disappeared, the obfuscations have been replaced by clarity. And what is in its place is a very unpopular President stoking the flames of a massive backlash.

I do not say this to be Pollyannish. The president and his supporters have a lot of power, and tens of millions of fervent members in their base. But we have seen a growing realization from not only moderates but conservatives who still care about the constitution and recognize how perilous is the threat of the modern GOP. Look at Michael Bloomberg pledging tens of millions of dollars to elect Democrats. Look at opinion writers who have preached for the GOP in the past say now is a time to elect Democrats. Look at men and women of power and fame who are arguing that this cannot stand.

I know there is a feeling among many progressives that they have lost, that the future is a foregone conclusion. They see the forces arrayed against them on the battlefield of justice and feel the doom of certain and impending defeat. But turn to your left and right and see the long lines of fellow citizens. Look behind you and see the formidable artillery of wealth and power that is on YOUR side. Take a deep breath and feel the cool air of hope and justice in your lungs, and then march forward.



Right now, it seems as if we cannot stop Trump and his cult. But the tides will turn, and the backlash will be strong. He and his sycophants will crawl back under their rocks, and we will write the history books on him. There will be no schools, no roads, and no airports named after him. He will go down as the man who almost destroyed America from within. We are stronger than him, we outnumber his followers—and we are on the right side of history.

Trump word for word:

“I have broken more Elton John records. He seems to have a lot of records. And I, by the way, I don’t have a musical instrument. I don’t have a guitar or an organ. No organ. Elton has an organ. And lots of other people helping. No, we’ve broken a lot of records. We’ve broken virtually every record. Because you know, look, I only need this space. They need much more room. For basketball, for hockey and all of the sports, they need a lot of room. We don’t need it. We have people in that space. So we break all of these records. Really, we do it without, like, the musical instruments. This is the only musical – the mouth. And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth, right? The brain. More important than the mouth is the brain. The brain is much more important.”

Brain doctor: President Trump may be suffering from a ‘degenerative brain disorder’
AOL.COM EDITORS
Dec 11th 2017 6:45PM

For years -- perhaps even decades, Donald Trump has been known for being brash, outspoken and easily confrontational. Those traits have been criticized by some and applauded by many as part of his frank and no-nonsense approach to his career and life in the White House.

But a doctor who specializes in brain injury medicine has suggested in a new article that those very behaviors could indicate that the president suffers from a “degenerative brain disorder" and that he should be tested.

“I see worrisome symptoms that fall into three main categories: problems with language and executive function; problems with social cognition and behavior; and problems with memory, attention, and concentration,” Dr. Ford Vox wrote in a piece published by the medical news site STAT last week.

Vox names a series of specific examples from his time on the campaign trail and in office as signs of a bigger medical problem, including fragmented and repetitive speech patterns, the battles he engaged some Gold Star families in -- and even his regular claim that millions of illegal v**es were cast for rival Hillary Clinton, which has not been substantiated by any reputable reporting.


"I see worrisome symptoms that fall into three main categories: problems with language and executive function; problems with social cognition and behavior; and problems with memory, attention, and concentration," he writes. "None of these are symptoms of being a bad or mean person. Nor do they require spelunking into the depths of his psyche to understand. Instead, they raise concern for a neurocognitive disease process in the same sense that wheezing raises the alarm for asthma."

"It’s time to discuss these issues in a clinical context…even if the president has a physical exam early next year and releases the records, as announced by the White House, what he really needs is thorough cognitive testing,” he continues.

He also acknowledges that the evidence provided is not sufficient for a diagnosis, which is why he advocates testing.



SEE MORE: White House announces physical exam for Trump after slurred speech

"It’s entirely possible that the president does not have predementia or is not progressing toward dementia. But he is definitely behaving as such," he adds.

Vox joins a small, but growing chorus of medical experts who have spoke out about the president's behavior in clinical terms.

Psychiatrist Bandy X. Lee has written two editorials on the matter in the past weeks, one for NBC and another in The New York Times, stressing the need for medical testing in both instances.

“Trump has already exceeded our usual threshold for evaluation," Lee claimed in his piece for NBC.

Wow, this is quite the stretch here joy, it's the right that wants to use the government to enforce mandatory birth and be up into the rights of women. Birth should never be the overreach of power by the government. Moral decisions, decisions on one's own body, in a free nation, is up to the individual.

We do not live in a dictatorship ...yet. Schools are public so that it is all inclusive for everyone to be able to get an education. If you don't like the public school you can choose a private one. It is the right that is spreading lies that the schools are "indoctrinating " children. When Indoctrination is something most often imposed from the extremist's agenda of the right, always working towards d******eness with others and conformity to their group's structure.

F*****m is the playbook of this new administration, written originally for N**iism.

The N**is WERE against the Chancellor of the Weimar Republic, as well as the President of the Weimar Republic. Chancellor Schleichor and President Hindenburg. Hitler was NOT elected. He was appointed. Due to threats from the N**is, Schleichor resigned and Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor.

Mandatory birth? What evidence do you have, or even rumors; that the right leaners wants women raped (or forced to undergo in vitro fertilization) to force them to become pregnant? That is news to me!

Indoctrination is indoctrination whether done by the right or left. As for current American public schools, it would be pretty hard for the right to be indoctrinating the public school children when the majority of educators are on the left. Is it any surprise that a system that is state-funded and state-run advocates for a bigger government? And why do you believe that it is okay for kids in public schools to be taught political correctness of left wing views and if someone wants their child to be taught without political bias they should pay for private schooling? Nor is conformity common on the right. In fact, that was put forth as a failing of the right by the left wing media when reporting on the Republican National Convention. A bunch of free and independent thinkers who insist on making up their own minds and not walking in lock-step.

If Trump changed his political party to run for president, why did he first change in 1980 when he didn't run till 2016? Like many people whose minds haven't gelled into stone as a young adult; he changed parties multiple times as he matured and developed a wider understanding of the world. The great majority of Americans start out as idealistic liberals. With maturity the majority veer rightward. And wanting to be idolized is a far thing from the media idolizing someone. Many people might want to be idolized but never will be. So how many articles or televised reporting by the main stream media have you experienced where they idolize Trump?

You say, "F*****m is the playbook of this new administration, written originally for N**iism." So give some examples. But make them accurate. For example when Trump was discussing the crimes of MS13, he called them animals. It was reported in the news that he called "immigrants" animals. Do you even know what N**iism is? It is National Socialism.

The N**is WERE against the Chancellor of the Weimar Republic, as well as the President of the Weimar Republic. Chancellor Schleichor and President Hindenburg. Hitler was NOT elected. He was appointed. Due to threats from the N**is, Schleichor resigned and Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor.

Mandatory birth? What evidence do you have, or even rumors; that the right leaners wants women raped (or forced to undergo in vitro fertilization) to force them to become pregnant? That is news to me!

Indoctrination is indoctrination whether done by the right or left. As for current American public schools, it would be pretty hard for the right to be indoctrinating the public school children when the majority of educators are on the left. Is it any surprise that a system that is state-funded and state-run advocates for a bigger government? And why do you believe that it is okay for kids in public schools to be taught political correctness of left wing views and if someone wants their child to be taught without political bias they should pay for private schooling? Nor is conformity common on the right. In fact, that was put forth as a failing of the right by the left wing media when reporting on the Republican National Convention. A bunch of free and independent thinkers who insist on making up their own minds and not walking in lock-step.

If Trump changed his political party to run for president, why did he first change in 1980 when he didn't run till 2016? Like many people whose minds haven't gelled into stone as a young adult; he changed parties multiple times as he matured and developed a wider understanding of the world. The great majority of Americans start out as idealistic liberals. With maturity the majority veer rightward. And wanting to be idolized is a far thing from the media idolizing someone. Many people might want to be idolized but never will be. So how many articles or televised reporting by the main stream media have you experienced where they idolize Trump?

You say, "F*****m is the playbook of this new administration, written originally for N**iism." So give some examples. But make them accurate. For example when Trump was discussing the crimes of MS13, he called them animals. It was reported in the news that he called "immigrants" animals. Do you even know what N**iism is? It is National Socialism.