BigMike wrote:
Ah...that's why my crippled Ma's 401k gained value.
Well as long as she's not working for Corporate America she should do pretty good. It's those who have to work for a living that get hurt...of course you and your peeps wouldn't have to worry about that would you...
buffalo wrote:
You know all your drivel is just bulls**t.
1.) Corporate welfare dwarfs social welfare. This is not a left or right leaning issue.
2.) Corporate welfare dwarfs social welfare. TRILLION dollar military spending, corporate welfare spending. Your that spending IS spending the US into bankruptcy. What free college? Free health CARE? Guess again bozo. Medicare is NOT free and cutting its budget will only hurt the elderly that worked all their live and STILL PAY for it. Wise up! I would rather MY tax dollars go to feed the poor and their children than to fund the continual illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering of the US to benefit big corporations. Obviously you love corporations and h**e the elderly and poor.
3.) What are those positive looking signs? Unemployment is down, not because of more jobs but because more people dropped out of the jobs market. This is proved by the employment participation rate which went down from April to May 2018. The r****d stock market is a rich man's game.
Just what are those other positive economic signs?
Fit, there are 2 economies in the US--One for the wealthy 10% and one for the rest of the sheople. Haven't you, in all you're years of experience, figured out that the wealthy 10% ALWAYS prosper no matter how the economy or stock market is doing?
You know all your drivel is just bulls**t. br b... (
show quote)
I was going to say something but you seem to have said it all...
old marine wrote:
I don't recall the white house or President Trump making a statement that 70% of the tax cuts would go to the workers or find any link to your statement.
Maybe it's because I don't read Socilest Democrats twisted f**e news.
Good thinking, unless the news comes from a RW rag you shouldn't believe anything that's said. After all, they wouldn't ever want to confuse you with the t***h would they...
PeterS wrote:
Well as long as she's not working for Corporate America she should do pretty good. It's those who have to work for a living that get hurt...of course you and your peeps wouldn't have to worry about that would you...
Inflammatory comment, pete.
Your specialty. Keep on rockin brother!
PeterS wrote:
Good thinking, unless the news comes from a RW rag you shouldn't believe anything that's said. After all, they wouldn't ever want to confuse you with the t***h would they...
My grandpaw was a very smart man, he taught me to think for myself and not make snap decisions about anything.
I do not read right or left wing lies Or watch f**e news. I judge a man for what he does not for what his father or he did years ago. I am not interested in the past only in the present and future.
True American patriots every where are begening to wake up and see the mess our beloved country is in after eight year's of socialist rule.
Many former democrats are switching parties working together to destroy the Socialist agenda
God bless America and true American patriots every where.
Long may old glory fly over the land of the free and home of the brave forever amen and amen .
buffalo wrote:
It is true...your just to brainwashed to believe the t***h, especially if it doesn't make trumpy look good.
Trumps makes himself look good .
archie bunker wrote:
Inflammatory comment, pete.
Your specialty. Keep on rockin brother!
That’s what libs. Do,they are dead in the water and sinking fast.
archie bunker wrote:
Inflammatory comment, pete.
Your specialty. Keep on rockin brother!
And what was inflammatory about my comment? If you don't work in Corporate America you should do pretty good. After all you are the people the tax cut was designed to benefit. It is the people who work for a living that will get hurt--either through higher interest rates that strangle growth in the economy, and wages, or through higher taxes designed to cut growth in the level of debt caused by a tax cut designed to benefit the wealthy. All of this are true statements so what is it about t***h that you find so inflammatory?
Hemiman wrote:
That’s what libs. Do,they are dead in the water and sinking fast.
So I will ask you the same question I asked Archie: what in my comment was inflammatory? Perhaps it's the word you don't understand...would you like me to post it for you?
INFLAMMATORY: (especially of speech or writing) arousing or intended to arouse angry or violent feelings.
"inflammatory slogans"
So what did I say to arouse angry or violent feelings?
Thank you for verifying everything the article said. By the way, Old Marine, T***hiness provided you with the link you asked for...
old marine wrote:
I don't recall the white house or President Trump making a statement that 70% of the tax cuts would go to the workers or find any link to your statement.
Maybe it's because I don't read Socilest Democrats twisted f**e news.
He has no link ~ he never has a link, it's just wh**ever comes out his warped mind. This is how c*******ts think.
buffalo wrote:
LOL! PROOF YOU know nothing of how the economy works. There is no logic to it. Either way, deficit-financed tax cuts must ultimately be paid for, and higher taxes and/or reductions in government spending are both likely to be harmful to middle class workers.
PROOF YOU know nothing of how the economy works. We don't know what effect it will have on the total deficit and debt. We'll have to see.
Were we to completely eliminate any deficit and debt with balanced budgets and enough to pay all our public debt, it would require the total Gross Domestic Product for 5 to 7 years, last time I calculated. That would prove interesting.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.