Europe and the Migrant Wars
Jun 20, 2018 13:27:35 #
Europe and the Migrant Wars
Europe is at war, and it is not the usual kind of war.
https://veteranstoday.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45978c25d1c6a5f695218bffa&id=611920e052&e=bebc80af01
Perhaps the only historical precedent to the migratory war from Africa and the Middle East is the migration westward of various peoples fleeing the depredations of the Huns in the 4th and 5th centuries A.D. That did not end well for then-Roman Europe, ushering in centuries accurately termed the Dark Ages. But there is a difference now. Today many governments welcomed the migrants (at least at first) and did not really try to repel them; and this time, if Europe fails to recover its balance and expel the migrants, there will not be any Renaissance to recover from the New Dark Ages that will inevitably ensue.
The Migrant Crisis
The broad details of the migrant crisis are well enough known not to require elaboration here, but there are some often overlooked nuances that do. To speak of “refugees” and “migrants” interchangeably is both deceptive and wrong. There are in fact three distinct categories of these immigrants, although all three are not found in all countries. One (and potentially if not actually the most stable) are those who either came from former colonies (Britain and France stand out here) or were deliberately brought in as workers (the largely Turkish Gastarbeiter in Germany come to mind), who have been in residence for generations, often hold citizenship, and for whom finding work and a home have traditionally been important for many.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ScreenH****r-901.jpg
Another are migrants, largely single males from Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East, principally arriving because of a fascinating collusion between human traffickers and NGOs. Most of these evince little interest in making stable homes and finding work, and appear to want only welfare and women – not necessarily in that order. And the last are the genuine refugees fleeing war. These include both single males and family groups, largely from the Middle East (Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Eritrea and Somalia stand out), virtually all from countries that have been shattered by US and European armed forces for no better reason than that they were on Israel’s list of enemies – a list that includes Iran, the only one not yet openly attacked.
The initial response from the EU and individual European countries varied widely. The politicrats of the EU in general have been strongly supportive of opening borders and welcoming migrants and refugees. Some European countries such as Sweden and Germany have been especially welcoming, while others – such as the Visegrad Group (Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic) have been hostile to the idea – often in the face of extreme hostility from the EU itself. And the responses of still others fell between the two extremes, in some cases such as Italy and now Slovenia simply being in the forefront of the migration path.
It quickly became apparent that however welcoming governments might be, the arrival of growing numbers of migrants – perhaps as many as 75% of whom are single males of military age – did not exactly usher in a period of peace and tranquility within any country from Britain across the Continent that accepted them. Migrants and refugees alike professed a desire for a better life, but they brought with them epidemics of crime – including r**t and rape – the establishment of what are euphemistically called “no-go zones” which even police enter at their peril – and urban decay. This ought not to surprise anyone, since the migrants themselves are the principal reason their home countries are what President Trump ungraciously but accurately called “s**tholes,” and there was and is no reason to expect them to act differently in Europe. But it is a strange way for people seeking succor to treat places that genuinely if unadvisedly welcomed them....
Europe is at war, and it is not the usual kind of war.
https://veteranstoday.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45978c25d1c6a5f695218bffa&id=611920e052&e=bebc80af01
Perhaps the only historical precedent to the migratory war from Africa and the Middle East is the migration westward of various peoples fleeing the depredations of the Huns in the 4th and 5th centuries A.D. That did not end well for then-Roman Europe, ushering in centuries accurately termed the Dark Ages. But there is a difference now. Today many governments welcomed the migrants (at least at first) and did not really try to repel them; and this time, if Europe fails to recover its balance and expel the migrants, there will not be any Renaissance to recover from the New Dark Ages that will inevitably ensue.
The Migrant Crisis
The broad details of the migrant crisis are well enough known not to require elaboration here, but there are some often overlooked nuances that do. To speak of “refugees” and “migrants” interchangeably is both deceptive and wrong. There are in fact three distinct categories of these immigrants, although all three are not found in all countries. One (and potentially if not actually the most stable) are those who either came from former colonies (Britain and France stand out here) or were deliberately brought in as workers (the largely Turkish Gastarbeiter in Germany come to mind), who have been in residence for generations, often hold citizenship, and for whom finding work and a home have traditionally been important for many.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ScreenH****r-901.jpg
Another are migrants, largely single males from Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East, principally arriving because of a fascinating collusion between human traffickers and NGOs. Most of these evince little interest in making stable homes and finding work, and appear to want only welfare and women – not necessarily in that order. And the last are the genuine refugees fleeing war. These include both single males and family groups, largely from the Middle East (Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Eritrea and Somalia stand out), virtually all from countries that have been shattered by US and European armed forces for no better reason than that they were on Israel’s list of enemies – a list that includes Iran, the only one not yet openly attacked.
The initial response from the EU and individual European countries varied widely. The politicrats of the EU in general have been strongly supportive of opening borders and welcoming migrants and refugees. Some European countries such as Sweden and Germany have been especially welcoming, while others – such as the Visegrad Group (Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic) have been hostile to the idea – often in the face of extreme hostility from the EU itself. And the responses of still others fell between the two extremes, in some cases such as Italy and now Slovenia simply being in the forefront of the migration path.
It quickly became apparent that however welcoming governments might be, the arrival of growing numbers of migrants – perhaps as many as 75% of whom are single males of military age – did not exactly usher in a period of peace and tranquility within any country from Britain across the Continent that accepted them. Migrants and refugees alike professed a desire for a better life, but they brought with them epidemics of crime – including r**t and rape – the establishment of what are euphemistically called “no-go zones” which even police enter at their peril – and urban decay. This ought not to surprise anyone, since the migrants themselves are the principal reason their home countries are what President Trump ungraciously but accurately called “s**tholes,” and there was and is no reason to expect them to act differently in Europe. But it is a strange way for people seeking succor to treat places that genuinely if unadvisedly welcomed them....
Jun 20, 2018 16:08:58 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Europe and the Migrant Wars br Europe is at war, a... (show quote)
The analysis left a bit of a cliffhanger after it promised a resemblance, l mean, why present a metaphor when there is no relationship between Roman Empire and the EU, I've never heard anyone calling the EU a German Empire in the last couple of days.
Now listen up,!
The problem is that the Refugees are genuine regardless of age and sex, because of Imperial policies of domination which are intrinsic to the value of exports and imports, "Artificial Intelligence" is coming to be advantaged by it two things are necessary, a manufacturing sector that is advantaged by economies of scale, and cheap raw materials.
Germany China and India will battle it out, anyone who gets in the way will be cleaned up by Corporate power, excess populations will head for Europe, because it's better than starving to death, if Europe tries to stop migration with walls and draconian f*****t measures the consequences of economic imperialism will end up as entire Countries wiped out, not only is this unconscionable it just won't be able to even get a foot hold without smashing the Nations that try to impose it, what happened to Putin's La- Pen or if you follow Russia culture the imbecile Dugan (Duganism) a follower of f*****t philosopher Martin Heidegger ?.
Dugan was Putin's top advisor now he's almost about ready for reeducation, and he badly need it.
Russia China and India don't practice imperial politics and policies, it doesn't matter if they start where the EU, - mainly the United Kingdom France and Italy who gave up their economic colonialism to advantage Germany, - leave off because it wil be a different situation then.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.