No wonder faux viewers are so stupid
Apr 9, 2014 02:10:37 #
Apr 9, 2014 03:54:41 #
BoJester wrote:
Wrong 72% of the time regarding c*****e c****e. The so-called bright broads at faux are just as bad as their male caunterparts. They all tell wh**ever lie roger ailes gives them to spew.
However the fools at faux may be more accurate than the lies that fat limburg and the savage weiner feed their i***t audiences daily.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/04/07/3423224/cable-news-accuracy-climate-science/
However the fools at faux may be more accurate than the lies that fat limburg and the savage weiner feed their i***t audiences daily.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/04/07/3423224/cable-news-accuracy-climate-science/
Apr 9, 2014 04:12:14 #
You know you're really a fool. First you called it g****l w*****g; when that didn't work you had to change it to c*****e c****e. For your information that is normal changes in the weather; always has been. What makes you think that human beings have much to do with it? Al Gore is a total liar and these people never let anyone who disagrees with them get involved in debates. For your further information Fox news, Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage are not the liars -- YOU & the left are; you see they all have integrity, because unlike the left t***h is something that the right, looks for, has as their value and tries to align themselves with. I know for you it's not all intentional; because it's all about what you want and what you feel and you're largely self deluded.
Apr 9, 2014 08:39:50 #
docwill wrote:
[\quote=permafrost]
97% of scientists accept it as fact, 3% of scientists
Secondly, what is the downside of trying to stop or slow the event. If we do decrease carbon footprints and nothing happens, what is the bad part.
Also, the above would be hard to prove, if we predict an event..
97% of scientists accept it as fact, 3% of scientists
Secondly, what is the downside of trying to stop or slow the event. If we do decrease carbon footprints and nothing happens, what is the bad part.
Also, the above would be hard to prove, if we predict an event..
Did you read the links? The costs to U.S. taxpayers is never-ending trillions while India and China do little.
Extraordinary claims involving extraordinary costs demand extraordinary proof. The "Warmists'" credibility do not justify compulsory
co-operation..[/quote]
As has been posted more than once, China led the world in solar installations the last year. India also has a large and growing environmental program. The US is not alone, we were one of the first, it is a world wide problem and the world is gearing up to fight for it..
The cost is one which can not be avoided, only delayed and the longer the delay the greater the expense.
Apr 9, 2014 08:43:02 #
Steve700 wrote:
You know you're really a fool. First you called it... (show quote)
You and the right truly can not call us the lairs, you simple refuse to accept the t***h. If you can not face it at least do not try to hinder it. The world is advancing with or without you and your kind..
Apr 9, 2014 11:27:57 #
permafrost wrote:
You and the right truly can not call us the lairs, you simple refuse to accept the t***h. If you can not face it at least do not try to hinder it. The world is advancing with or without you and your kind..
That fellow is a few fries short of a happy meal! :thumbup:
Apr 9, 2014 23:46:18 #
permafrost wrote:
As has been posted more than once, China led the world in solar installations the last year. India also has a large and growing environmental program. The US is not alone, we were one of the first, it is a world wide problem and the world is gearing up to fight for it..
The cost is one which can not be avoided, only delayed and the longer the delay the greater the expense.
The cost is one which can not be avoided, only delayed and the longer the delay the greater the expense.
China and India hide behind the Kyoto "developing economies" clause which exempt them from CO2 caps. Their CO2 "contributions" are increasing by significant percentages every year while the non-signing U.S. percentages have dropped each year.
China's solar industry exists because they think it will payoff and decrease their smog problems. It is, at most,
tangentially related to Kyoto. They are still opening coal-fired power-plants at a ferocious rate.
Apr 10, 2014 00:01:32 #
What is it with you energy obstructors who want the U.S. hamstrung and dictated to by U.N. wannabe-oppressor, climate-N**I's?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.