Radiance3 wrote:
==================
Who run the economy but the top 10%. They provide employment, they pay the taxes. Do you expect the handouts to run the economy?
So, your OK with the wealth ine******y that socialism has brought in "those countries south of the border, the Mexico way" and the socialism that wealth ine******y is bringing to the US? So, your OK with those 10% wealthiest that "provide employment" no matter how little they pay? Because you are DEAD wrong about "who run the economy but the top 10%". The rich do NOT create the jobs, customers do.
http://www.businessinsider.com/rich-people-create-jobs-2013-11 Without the demand provided by a strong middle class earning enough wages to buy the things necessary for their families the economy cannot grow but instead will weaken. The top 10% do NOT run the economy because of their wealth. It is the middle and poor classes, by their shear numbers, that create demand for the majority of goods and services in this country and therefore drives the economy. Without a strong middle class there can be no economic growth.
Consider this, from 1947 to 1979, when the middle class received 54 percent of the nation’s total income on average, the economy grew at a steady clip of 3.7 percent per year. That was 1 percentage point higher than the 2.7 percent rate it grew at from 1980 to 2010, when the middle class was weakening to its current share of only 46 percent. 1% difference in annual growth is a big deal. So the bigger percentage of the US total income the wealthy take the slower economic growth is. THAT is exactly what has been happening over the last 40 years.
It should not be surprising then, that as the rich have pulled away from the middle class, their relative political power has significantly increased compared to the middle class. Which has distorted the political system in the US. The wealthy use their disproportionate power and influence to secure special favors, wasting taxpayer dollars on narrow tax breaks, bank bailouts, special copyright terms, and giveaways of public resources.
"So, if you like the income ine******y of Latin America, you will love a Trump administration"
http://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/is-the-united-states-headed-the-way-of-latin-america-in-income-ine******y"Growth happens when lots of people spend money. In the U.S., for example, the small number of people at the top of the economic ladder can't consume and spend at the rate that the broader population can. And the distribution of income means that there are many more in the bottom 40 percent by income than there are in the top 40 percent by income. Unless a policy addresses lower incomes, and not just official poverty, it won't succeed in helping the economy.
The OECD said that certain types of income redistribution -- specifically, high-value services like good education and healthcare -- increase, and not decrease, economic growth if effectively targeted without inefficiency and waste."
http://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2014/12/09/income-ine******y-hurts-economic-growth/#23106b1f591a"Extreme ine******y has increased in Mexico while the economy has stagnated, concentrating almost half of the country's wealth in the hands of its elite 1 percent, according to a new Oxfam report.
According to the report, the wealth of the Mexico's 16 billionaires multiplies five fold each year, while the country's GDP increases by less than 1 percent annually. Mexico is among the top 14 richest countries in the world by GDP, yet over half its population, or 53 million people, live in poverty."
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Mexicos-Extreme-Ine******y-1-Owns-Half-of-Countrys-Wealth-20150625-0034.htmlTHAT is EXACTLY where the US is headed!