They have a point, you know, tolerance is cool. All we need is a tolerance list, so we know what the approved things are that we must tolerate, otherwise, we'll run afoul of the tolerance police - and then WE won't be tolerated.

What confuses me is, how can such a small population force such narrow mindedness on the rest of us? Could it be because they make the most noise? Did EVERYONE at Mozilla disapprove? or were the others afraid to say anything. Because of Cupid's reaction, does that mean that everyone who uses them felt the same way? or did they just not say anything.

This even got lots of attention, but I didn't hear a whole lot of defense from the folk who used that $1000.00, or anyone else that agreed with him. I really don't see what's so scary about the intolerant tolerators, so why is everyone else so silent when they go into a rant? Seems like that when those tolerant poodles show their teeth, the rest of us go belly up and submit, then whine once they've moved on to the next victim.

The "Gay" rights activists threatened and interrupted the APA (American Psychiatric Association) and the American Psychological Association meetings in 1973 demanding that homosexuality be removed from the list of mental illnesses. They pressured the American Federation of Teachers demanding that
homosexuals be the ones teaching sex education in schools (which is now happening in more and more schools) They are now demanding that the age of consent for man to boy sex be lowered to 12. Their pressure on the libraries of most major cities to provide NO books on changing homosexuality or any books on the homosexual agenda. They have gotten their way to the point that in most major municipalities if a library is offered by a patron any book that tells the t***h about homosexuality, that it is not genetic and people can change, with help if they want to, the book WILL NOT be accepted.

The homosexual population is less than 3 % of the adult population in this country, and they have done more damage to the culture that made America great than any other group. Therapists who try to tell the t***h to the public have their practices damaged or burned down, or at the very least have pickets outside their offices discouraging patients or threatening them. The only way to get the message across is through channels like this one.

There are not many Gays on this sight. And the ones who are don't cause much problems. . Its the radical ones who are making such a ruckus. The left love them because if its immoral they gravitate like a fly to s**t. Utah is fighting this marriage thing and other states are watching to see if we win.
But,if the right was to picket and throw things like they do.... maybe the judges would rule correctly. I'm mad that our states money is being used,while others sit and ponder if they should get their hands dirty. Hell yea! Let's fight and b***h like they do... at least it would garner press coverage. We could see to it!

My patience is at an end with these purse waiving, tuxedo wearing N**is.

Someone please prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that because this man gave $1000.00 to Prop he ever in any way, shape of form discriminated in hiring, firing, promotion or other manner against any person who was homosexual.

Andrew Sullivan definitely provided a clear and accurate statement on this subject matter.


Mozilla Chief Learns, if You Don’t Support Gay Marriage, You Don’t Deserve a Job
Todd Starnes | Apr 04, 2014


As we enter this golden age of tolerance and diversity, the nation’s gay rights community is sending a warning message to Americans: If you don’t support gay marriage, you don’t deserve a job.

Apparently, Brendan Eich did not get that message. He’s the former chief executive officer at Mozilla, the technology group that gave us the Firefox Web browser.

Eich resigned under a firestorm of controversy after it was revealed he had donated $1,000 in support of California’s Proposition 8, a b****t initiative that protected traditional marriage.
It’s unclear who outed Eich. But that really doesn’t matter. Once his donation was revealed, supporters of gay marriage launched all-out war.

The Wall Street Journal reported that OKCupid, the popular online dating website, asked its followers to stop using Firefox. The wireless company Credo Mobile gathered more than 50,000 signatures on a petition calling for Eich to resign.

OKCupid posted a letter denouncing the Mozilla CEO, The New York Times reported.

“Those who seek to deny love and instead enforce misery, shame and frustration are our enemies and we wish them nothing but failure,” the letter stated.

Why not demand that those who oppose gay marriage relinquish the right to own property? Why not take away their right to v**e? Why not take away their children? Why not just throw them in jail? Why not force them to work in chain gangs? Why not call for public floggings? Or better yet, let’s just strap them down on gurneys, stick a needle in their arm and rid the world of these intolerant anti-gay bigots once and for all.

Eich won’t say he was forced to resign, but based on the company’s press release, it’s safe to say his days were numbered.

“Mozilla p***es itself on being held to a different standard and, this past week, we didn’t live up to it,” Mozilla Executive Chairwoman Mitchell Baker wrote in a statement.

“We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we haven’t stayed true to ourselves.”

She went on to opine about freedom of speech and e******y. In her estimation, one trumps the other.

“E******y is necessary for meaningful speech,” she wrote. “And you need free speech to fight for e******y. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard.”

No, not really, Ms. Baker. Our Founding Fathers sort of worked that out in the Bill of Rights.

I write about this very issue in my upcoming book, “God Less America.” There are pages and pages filled with stories of workers and business owners who’ve either lost their jobs or faced public floggings for their support of traditional marriage.

The left does not believe people who oppose gay marriage should be allowed to engage in the democratic process. And they have a proven track record of intimidating and bullying those who do.

Just ask Angela McCask**l, the chief diversity officer at Gallaudet University. She was suspended after she signed a petition in her church to put a gay marriage referendum on the b****t in Maryland.

Just ask Scott Eckern, the former artistic director of California Musical Theatre. He resigned under pressure after he gave money to support Prop 8. As one activist told The New York Times, “I do believe there comes a time when you cannot sit back and accept what I think is the most dangerous form of bigotry.”

Just ask our nation’s top military officials. They were called into President Obama’s office and told that if they could not support “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” they should resign their commissions.

“We were called into the Oval Office and President Obama looked at all five service chiefs in the eye and said, ‘This is what I want to do,’” said Coast Guard Adm. Robert Papp in remarks reported by Buzzfeed.

The road to political correctness is littered with the bodies of folks like Brendan Eich sideswiped by the tolerance and diversity bus.

I trust there are rational and reasonable individuals within the gay rights community who understand the dangers of stifling free speech and expression. But the voices that are winning the day are those who believe gay rights trump everyone else’s rights.

I know this may sound old-fashioned, but gainful employment should not be determined by where you put your reproductive organs.

Tolerance is a b*tch, ain’t it?

Gay journalist Andrew Sullivan ‘disgusted’ by gay rights ‘fanaticism’ after Mozilla CEO resigns
1:18 PM 04/04/2014

Brendan Bordelon

Openly-gay journalist Andrew Sullivan expressed his “disgust” over Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich’s resignation for his one-time opposition to gay marriage, calling it a symptom of gay rights “fanaticism” and warning the movement is fast becoming “no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”

The former editor at The Atlantic and The New Republic is widely regarded as the intellectual father of the gay marriage movement. He wrote the first story to advocate for gay marriage in 1989 — a piece many regard as the blueprint for gay marriage laws and the normalization of homosexuality in America — and has a “tendency to view virtually everything through a ‘gay’ prism.”

But despite his activism, Sullivan is furious over Eich’s persecution for his $1,000 donation to California’s Prop 8 campaign in 2008, which made gay marriage illegal in the state (RELATED: Mozilla CEO out over opposition to gay marriage).

“The guy who had the gall to to express his First Amendment rights and favor Prop 8 in California by donating $1,000 has just been scalped by some gay activists,” he wrote in a blog post titled “The Hounding of a Heretic.”

“Will he now be forced to walk through the streets in shame?” Sullivan asked. “Why not the stocks? The whole episode disgusts me — as it should disgust anyone interested in a tolerant and diverse society.”

“If this is the gay rights movement today — hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else — then count me out,” he added. “If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”

In a follow-up piece posted hours later, a still-incensed Sullivan blasted the “repugnantly illiberal sentiment” that Eich could’ve saved his job, if he’d only renounced his views.

“He did not understand that in order to be a CEO of a company, you have to renounce your heresy!” he wrote. “There is only one permissible opinion at Mozilla, and all dissidents must be purged! Yep, that’s left-liberal tolerance in a nut-shell.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/04/andrew-sullivan-disgusted-by-gay-rights-fanaticism-mozilla/#ixzz2xxh3XoC1

They have a point, you know, tolerance is cool. All we need is a tolerance list, so we know what the approved things are that we must tolerate, otherwise, we'll run afoul of the tolerance police - and then WE won't be tolerated.

What confuses me is, how can such a small population force such narrow mindedness on the rest of us? Could it be because they make the most noise? Did EVERYONE at Mozilla disapprove? or were the others afraid to say anything. Because of Cupid's reaction, does that mean that everyone who uses them felt the same way? or did they just not say anything.

This even got lots of attention, but I didn't hear a whole lot of defense from the folk who used that $1000.00, or anyone else that agreed with him. I really don't see what's so scary about the intolerant tolerators, so why is everyone else so silent when they go into a rant? Seems like that when those tolerant poodles show their teeth, the rest of us go belly up and submit, then whine once they've moved on to the next victim.

The "Gay" rights activists threatened and interrupted the APA (American Psychiatric Association) and the American Psychological Association meetings in 1973 demanding that homosexuality be removed from the list of mental illnesses. They pressured the American Federation of Teachers demanding that
homosexuals be the ones teaching sex education in schools (which is now happening in more and more schools) They are now demanding that the age of consent for man to boy sex be lowered to 12. Their pressure on the libraries of most major cities to provide NO books on changing homosexuality or any books on the homosexual agenda. They have gotten their way to the point that in most major municipalities if a library is offered by a patron any book that tells the t***h about homosexuality, that it is not genetic and people can change, with help if they want to, the book WILL NOT be accepted.

The homosexual population is less than 3 % of the adult population in this country, and they have done more damage to the culture that made America great than any other group. Therapists who try to tell the t***h to the public have their practices damaged or burned down, or at the very least have pickets outside their offices discouraging patients or threatening them. The only way to get the message across is through channels like this one.