One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
"You Can't have your cake and eat it too" Letter to Congresswoman Titus NV
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 18, 2018 02:47:35   #
MICHAEL SALADEN
 
Rep. Titus.

You mention that enforcement of i******s in our nation would run a cost of approx. $30 billion a year... This is a significant saving over the cost of housing, food, medical and checks issued to the tune of $1,700.00 a month for i******s to be provided, for illegally entering our nation... We must stop this huge waste of taxpayer dollars now and completely...Savings of hundreds of billions not to mention lives which will be saved by preventing the i******s from entering our nation...

We are currently under a very serious threat to our people by immigrants who willfully and knowingly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Sections 212 passed June 27, 1952, and revised in 1967, which clearly outlines the criteria denying entry to any and all immigrants, refugees, or work visa card holders... This criterion is not only reasonable but should be required of anyone who seeks to assimilate to our culture and not the other way around...

Nearly all who live in our nation has taken a solemn oath to protect our Constitution, Government, and very way of life from all threats both foreign and domestic... Anyone not supporting the laws of our land and who seek to aid the i*****l i*********n and prolonging of the i******s currently in our nation or those who directly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 become the very threat we seek to protect our Constitution, Government and very way of Life from...

I believe the old adage of "You can't have your cake and eat it too" is applicable in this instance...

The real and present threat posed by the Occult of Islam needs to be addressed along with the immigration problems we now face... Anyone who believes or backs immigration status of Muslims is also in violation of Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 and therefore becomes the very threat to our Constitution, Government and very way of life, as the Muslim have self-proclaimed themselves to be actively, openly, and aggesively following thier doctrine, which not only is contrary to the morals, values, standards, and ehtichal conduct, (which is contrary to that of all Western Civilization), they boast of Jihad and the fact that they will dominate and subjugate all non-belivers by simply out populating us in our own countries...

To date Muslims have succeeded in 12 countries in South Africa and currently threaten most of the countries in Europe from being changed to Sharia Law and effectively new States of Islam, completely wiping out any competition or freedom of choice and practice of religious beliefs...

At what cost to the taxpayers of Nevada does it take to support the 500,000 immigrants and i******s currently in our state?

It is far more than the taxpayer dollar we risk sacrificing if we do not act now and protect our very way of life, by upholding the very foundation of our nation as "One Nation Under God, Indivisible, With Liberty And Justice For All...

So I ask you, Representative Titus, will you stand by the very "Oath Of Office" you took, placing your hand on the Bible swearing to uphold?

Representative Titus this is not a rhetorical question and I am hopeful that you will publically acknowledge your oath and reaffirm your pledge to the citizens of Nevada and the United States of America and join in the spirit which is American, with a bi-partisan effort to protect the Citizens of our Great Nation from the clear and present danger which clearly and currently plagues our nation...

with the greatest of sincerity,
citizen of Nevada,
Patriotic American,
Michael P. Saladen

Reply
May 18, 2018 06:14:08   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
MICHAEL SALADEN wrote:
Rep. Titus.

You mention that enforcement of i******s in our nation would run a cost of approx. $30 billion a year... This is a significant saving over the cost of housing, food, medical and checks issued to the tune of $1,700.00 a month for i******s to be provided, for illegally entering our nation... We must stop this huge waste of taxpayer dollars now and completely...Savings of hundreds of billions not to mention lives which will be saved by preventing the i******s from entering our nation...

We are currently under a very serious threat to our people by immigrants who willfully and knowingly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Sections 212 passed June 27, 1952, and revised in 1967, which clearly outlines the criteria denying entry to any and all immigrants, refugees, or work visa card holders... This criterion is not only reasonable but should be required of anyone who seeks to assimilate to our culture and not the other way around...

Nearly all who live in our nation has taken a solemn oath to protect our Constitution, Government, and very way of life from all threats both foreign and domestic... Anyone not supporting the laws of our land and who seek to aid the i*****l i*********n and prolonging of the i******s currently in our nation or those who directly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 become the very threat we seek to protect our Constitution, Government and very way of Life from...

I believe the old adage of "You can't have your cake and eat it too" is applicable in this instance...

The real and present threat posed by the Occult of Islam needs to be addressed along with the immigration problems we now face... Anyone who believes or backs immigration status of Muslims is also in violation of Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 and therefore becomes the very threat to our Constitution, Government and very way of life, as the Muslim have self-proclaimed themselves to be actively, openly, and aggesively following thier doctrine, which not only is contrary to the morals, values, standards, and ehtichal conduct, (which is contrary to that of all Western Civilization), they boast of Jihad and the fact that they will dominate and subjugate all non-belivers by simply out populating us in our own countries...

To date Muslims have succeeded in 12 countries in South Africa and currently threaten most of the countries in Europe from being changed to Sharia Law and effectively new States of Islam, completely wiping out any competition or freedom of choice and practice of religious beliefs...

At what cost to the taxpayers of Nevada does it take to support the 500,000 immigrants and i******s currently in our state?

It is far more than the taxpayer dollar we risk sacrificing if we do not act now and protect our very way of life, by upholding the very foundation of our nation as "One Nation Under God, Indivisible, With Liberty And Justice For All...

So I ask you, Representative Titus, will you stand by the very "Oath Of Office" you took, placing your hand on the Bible swearing to uphold?

Representative Titus this is not a rhetorical question and I am hopeful that you will publically acknowledge your oath and reaffirm your pledge to the citizens of Nevada and the United States of America and join in the spirit which is American, with a bi-partisan effort to protect the Citizens of our Great Nation from the clear and present danger which clearly and currently plagues our nation...

with the greatest of sincerity,
citizen of Nevada,
Patriotic American,
Michael P. Saladen
Rep. Titus. br br You mention that enforcement of... (show quote)


Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unless they are a proven danger, and there are standards for that. They cannot be denied entry because of their religion. They can be denied entry because of anti-US actions they have taken. I don't think statements count. If they sneak in, they can be imprisoned and deported.
I am far more concerned about the Republicans who support another (this makes the eighth one since the mid-eighties) amnesty for wetbacks. There are currently about one million Mexican citizens standing in line and respecting our laws, trying to become citizens the legal way. These are mostly people with job sk**ls and education who have shown by their willingness to deal with the bureaucracy that they do and will respect our laws, yet these Goddamn politicians are bending over backwards to kiss a wetback's ass.
Any politician who supports another amnesty for i*****l a***ns should be deported along with them. Unfortunately, that is not an option. Democrats want v**ers, and i******s overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates, and the RINOs who support amnesty are in the pocket, directly or indirectly of the US Chamber of Commerce, another organization which supports uncontrolled immigration for a source of cheap labor. By the way, i******s cost this country closer to 80 billion to over 100 billion dollars a year. Most of the cost of their upkeep is borne by state and local governments, and is not included in many Federal estimates. The ten or twelve billion per year they put into the economy isn't much of a deal for us.
I was shocked to find Representative Mia Love on board with Representative Denham's unconditional amnesty. Do Utah v**er know she is doing this? I somehow doubt it. I considered calling her office, but I figured that a politician who won't listen to her own constituents is unlikely to give a damn what someone outside her district thinks.

Reply
May 18, 2018 06:48:19   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
MICHAEL SALADEN wrote:
Rep. Titus.

You mention that enforcement of i******s in our nation would run a cost of approx. $30 billion a year... This is a significant saving over the cost of housing, food, medical and checks issued to the tune of $1,700.00 a month for i******s to be provided, for illegally entering our nation... We must stop this huge waste of taxpayer dollars now and completely...Savings of hundreds of billions not to mention lives which will be saved by preventing the i******s from entering our nation...

We are currently under a very serious threat to our people by immigrants who willfully and knowingly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Sections 212 passed June 27, 1952, and revised in 1967, which clearly outlines the criteria denying entry to any and all immigrants, refugees, or work visa card holders... This criterion is not only reasonable but should be required of anyone who seeks to assimilate to our culture and not the other way around...

Nearly all who live in our nation has taken a solemn oath to protect our Constitution, Government, and very way of life from all threats both foreign and domestic... Anyone not supporting the laws of our land and who seek to aid the i*****l i*********n and prolonging of the i******s currently in our nation or those who directly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 become the very threat we seek to protect our Constitution, Government and very way of Life from...

I believe the old adage of "You can't have your cake and eat it too" is applicable in this instance...

The real and present threat posed by the Occult of Islam needs to be addressed along with the immigration problems we now face... Anyone who believes or backs immigration status of Muslims is also in violation of Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 and therefore becomes the very threat to our Constitution, Government and very way of life, as the Muslim have self-proclaimed themselves to be actively, openly, and aggesively following thier doctrine, which not only is contrary to the morals, values, standards, and ehtichal conduct, (which is contrary to that of all Western Civilization), they boast of Jihad and the fact that they will dominate and subjugate all non-belivers by simply out populating us in our own countries...

To date Muslims have succeeded in 12 countries in South Africa and currently threaten most of the countries in Europe from being changed to Sharia Law and effectively new States of Islam, completely wiping out any competition or freedom of choice and practice of religious beliefs...

At what cost to the taxpayers of Nevada does it take to support the 500,000 immigrants and i******s currently in our state?

It is far more than the taxpayer dollar we risk sacrificing if we do not act now and protect our very way of life, by upholding the very foundation of our nation as "One Nation Under God, Indivisible, With Liberty And Justice For All...

So I ask you, Representative Titus, will you stand by the very "Oath Of Office" you took, placing your hand on the Bible swearing to uphold?

Representative Titus this is not a rhetorical question and I am hopeful that you will publically acknowledge your oath and reaffirm your pledge to the citizens of Nevada and the United States of America and join in the spirit which is American, with a bi-partisan effort to protect the Citizens of our Great Nation from the clear and present danger which clearly and currently plagues our nation...

with the greatest of sincerity,
citizen of Nevada,
Patriotic American,
Michael P. Saladen
Rep. Titus. br br You mention that enforcement of... (show quote)

Great post. Deporting should start immediately and anyone aiding and/or harboring should be sent along with their illegal criminal aliens.

God bless America and President Trump

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2018 06:56:53   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
Loki wrote:
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unless they are a proven danger, and there are standards for that. They cannot be denied entry because of their religion. They can be denied entry because of anti-US actions they have taken. I don't think statements count. If they sneak in, they can be imprisoned and deported.
I am far more concerned about the Republicans who support another (this makes the eighth one since the mid-eighties) amnesty for wetbacks. There are currently about one million Mexican citizens standing in line and respecting our laws, trying to become citizens the legal way. These are mostly people with job sk**ls and education who have shown by their willingness to deal with the bureaucracy that they do and will respect our laws, yet these Goddamn politicians are bending over backwards to kiss a wetback's ass.
Any politician who supports another amnesty for i*****l a***ns should be deported along with them. Unfortunately, that is not an option. Democrats want v**ers, and i******s overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates, and the RINOs who support amnesty are in the pocket, directly or indirectly of the US Chamber of Commerce, another organization which supports uncontrolled immigration for a source of cheap labor. By the way, i******s cost this country closer to 80 billion to over 100 billion dollars a year. Most of the cost of their upkeep is borne by state and local governments, and is not included in many Federal estimates. The ten or twelve billion per year they put into the economy isn't much of a deal for us.
I was shocked to find Representative Mia Love on board with Representative Denham's unconditional amnesty. Do Utah v**er know she is doing this? I somehow doubt it. I considered calling her office, but I figured that a politician who won't listen to her own constituents is unlikely to give a damn what someone outside her district thinks.
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unle... (show quote)

I seem to recall a post here with a link to a law passed in the early "50s prohibition Muslims from entering the United States.


Obummer had invited a bunch of his muslim friends and they just stayed and never left.

God bless America and President Trump

Reply
May 18, 2018 09:02:18   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Loki wrote:
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unless they are a proven danger, and there are standards for that. They cannot be denied entry because of their religion. They can be denied entry because of anti-US actions they have taken. I don't think statements count. If they sneak in, they can be imprisoned and deported.
I am far more concerned about the Republicans who support another (this makes the eighth one since the mid-eighties) amnesty for wetbacks. There are currently about one million Mexican citizens standing in line and respecting our laws, trying to become citizens the legal way. These are mostly people with job sk**ls and education who have shown by their willingness to deal with the bureaucracy that they do and will respect our laws, yet these Goddamn politicians are bending over backwards to kiss a wetback's ass.
Any politician who supports another amnesty for i*****l a***ns should be deported along with them. Unfortunately, that is not an option. Democrats want v**ers, and i******s overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates, and the RINOs who support amnesty are in the pocket, directly or indirectly of the US Chamber of Commerce, another organization which supports uncontrolled immigration for a source of cheap labor. By the way, i******s cost this country closer to 80 billion to over 100 billion dollars a year. Most of the cost of their upkeep is borne by state and local governments, and is not included in many Federal estimates. The ten or twelve billion per year they put into the economy isn't much of a deal for us.
I was shocked to find Representative Mia Love on board with Representative Denham's unconditional amnesty. Do Utah v**er know she is doing this? I somehow doubt it. I considered calling her office, but I figured that a politician who won't listen to her own constituents is unlikely to give a damn what someone outside her district thinks.
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unle... (show quote)

I thought there was a law not to allow them in the country set up by Roosevelt I think not sure it's never been taken off it still stands

Reply
May 18, 2018 09:03:52   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
old marine wrote:
I seem to recall a post here with a link to a law passed in the early "50s prohibition Muslims from entering the United States.


Obummer had invited a bunch of his muslim friends and they just stayed and never left.

God bless America and President Trump


Obama had the whole brother hood in the white house that was scary

Reply
May 18, 2018 10:54:32   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
old marine wrote:
I seem to recall a post here with a link to a law passed in the early "50s prohibition Muslims from entering the United States.


Obummer had invited a bunch of his muslim friends and they just stayed and never left.

God bless America and President Trump


It wasn't just for Muslims. It was 1952. The president has authority to ban people or groups he has reasonable cause to believe intend to do the US harm.
It is spelled out in 8USC 1182

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2018 12:50:00   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
Loki wrote:
It wasn't just for Muslims. It was 1952. The president has authority to ban people or groups he has reasonable cause to believe intend to do the US harm.
It is spelled out in 8USC 1182

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182

Thank you. I must be getting old.😆😎

I just couldn't remember the dates.

God bless you America and President Trump

Reply
May 18, 2018 17:23:45   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
old marine wrote:
Thank you. I must be getting old.😆😎

I just couldn't remember the dates.

God bless you America and President Trump

My late uncle was a state attorney general and a superior court judge for decades. My aunt was his paralegal all that time. She taught me how to look this crap up.

Reply
May 20, 2018 15:23:06   #
Candygrugel
 
MICHAEL SALADEN wrote:
Rep. Titus.

You mention that enforcement of i******s in our nation would run a cost of approx. $30 billion a year... This is a significant saving over the cost of housing, food, medical and checks issued to the tune of $1,700.00 a month for i******s to be provided, for illegally entering our nation... We must stop this huge waste of taxpayer dollars now and completely...Savings of hundreds of billions not to mention lives which will be saved by preventing the i******s from entering our nation...

We are currently under a very serious threat to our people by immigrants who willfully and knowingly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Sections 212 passed June 27, 1952, and revised in 1967, which clearly outlines the criteria denying entry to any and all immigrants, refugees, or work visa card holders... This criterion is not only reasonable but should be required of anyone who seeks to assimilate to our culture and not the other way around...

Nearly all who live in our nation has taken a solemn oath to protect our Constitution, Government, and very way of life from all threats both foreign and domestic... Anyone not supporting the laws of our land and who seek to aid the i*****l i*********n and prolonging of the i******s currently in our nation or those who directly violate Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 become the very threat we seek to protect our Constitution, Government and very way of Life from...

I believe the old adage of "You can't have your cake and eat it too" is applicable in this instance...

The real and present threat posed by the Occult of Islam needs to be addressed along with the immigration problems we now face... Anyone who believes or backs immigration status of Muslims is also in violation of Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 and therefore becomes the very threat to our Constitution, Government and very way of life, as the Muslim have self-proclaimed themselves to be actively, openly, and aggesively following thier doctrine, which not only is contrary to the morals, values, standards, and ehtichal conduct, (which is contrary to that of all Western Civilization), they boast of Jihad and the fact that they will dominate and subjugate all non-belivers by simply out populating us in our own countries...

To date Muslims have succeeded in 12 countries in South Africa and currently threaten most of the countries in Europe from being changed to Sharia Law and effectively new States of Islam, completely wiping out any competition or freedom of choice and practice of religious beliefs...

At what cost to the taxpayers of Nevada does it take to support the 500,000 immigrants and i******s currently in our state?

It is far more than the taxpayer dollar we risk sacrificing if we do not act now and protect our very way of life, by upholding the very foundation of our nation as "One Nation Under God, Indivisible, With Liberty And Justice For All...

So I ask you, Representative Titus, will you stand by the very "Oath Of Office" you took, placing your hand on the Bible swearing to uphold?

Representative Titus this is not a rhetorical question and I am hopeful that you will publically acknowledge your oath and reaffirm your pledge to the citizens of Nevada and the United States of America and join in the spirit which is American, with a bi-partisan effort to protect the Citizens of our Great Nation from the clear and present danger which clearly and currently plagues our nation...

with the greatest of sincerity,
citizen of Nevada,
Patriotic American,
Michael P. Saladen
Rep. Titus. br br You mention that enforcement of... (show quote)


I*****l a***ns get $1700 per month, and I think it is more, and I worked from age 12 to retirement and I don't get anywhere near that amount. It pays more to break our laws than it does to play by the rules.

Reply
May 20, 2018 23:05:37   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
Candygrugel wrote:
I*****l a***ns get $1700 per month, and I think it is more, and I worked from age 12 to retirement and I don't get anywhere near that amount. It pays more to break our laws than it does to play by the rules.

I totally agree with you.

But with Demon-Rats buying i*****l a***ns as v**ers I hope both are deported.


God bless America and the President

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2018 23:14:18   #
MICHAEL SALADEN
 
Loki wrote:
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unless they are a proven danger, and there are standards for that. They cannot be denied entry because of their religion. They can be denied entry because of anti-US actions they have taken. I don't think statements count. If they sneak in, they can be imprisoned and deported.
I am far more concerned about the Republicans who support another (this makes the eighth one since the mid-eighties) amnesty for wetbacks. There are currently about one million Mexican citizens standing in line and respecting our laws, trying to become citizens the legal way. These are mostly people with job sk**ls and education who have shown by their willingness to deal with the bureaucracy that they do and will respect our laws, yet these Goddamn politicians are bending over backwards to kiss a wetback's ass.
Any politician who supports another amnesty for i*****l a***ns should be deported along with them. Unfortunately, that is not an option. Democrats want v**ers, and i******s overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates, and the RINOs who support amnesty are in the pocket, directly or indirectly of the US Chamber of Commerce, another organization which supports uncontrolled immigration for a source of cheap labor. By the way, i******s cost this country closer to 80 billion to over 100 billion dollars a year. Most of the cost of their upkeep is borne by state and local governments and is not included in many Federal estimates. The ten or twelve billion per year they put into the economy isn't much of a deal for us.
I was shocked to find Representative Mia Love on board with Representative Denham's unconditional amnesty. Do Utah v**er know she is doing this? I somehow doubt it. I considered calling her office, but I figured that a politician who won't listen to her own constituents is unlikely to give a damn what someone outside her district thinks.
Actually, Michael, we cannot keep Muslims out unle... (show quote)


Loki, respectfully, Public Law 414, Title II, Chapter I, section 212. specifically outlines the criteria which deny entry to the US by all Immigrants, Work Card Visa Holders and Refugees which possess, distribute, attempts to distribute, teaches or follows doctrine which is contrary to the Constitution, Laws of our Land or threatens to seek the o*******w of our Government or very way of life... Since The Teachings of Islam and Muhammad are by definition; "The Occult", and they should not be deemed a religion, but they are defined as a doctrine, which was created by the use or lack of morals, values, standards, and ethical conduct which is contrary to that of our country... For this reason, they are denied entry into the US-based on Public Law 414 and are the very definition of Public Law 414...

Any persons proclaiming to not be able to assimilate to our culture and seek to change it by v****g in their laws and culture like what is occurring in Michigan are a clear and present threat to our way of life and the Constitution we swore to defend against this very threat...

Muslims in Europe, Australia, and Africa have proclaimed that they will take down America and introduce Sharia Law to o*******w our cultures... They have openly declared "Jihad" against ALL Western Cultures based on the 9th verses in the Qu'ran, which specifically states to put all infidels, apostates, or any non-believers to the sword and subjugate all who are not k**led... They have also openly and actively declared that they will have 8 children to every 2 children in every country they have immigrated too until they out populate the countries and simply v**e out existing laws of each country replacing it with Sharia Law and o*******wing each government by subtly replacing representation by Muslims in each government of the countries they have migrated into... They have openly declared that they are unwilling or unable to assimilate to US Culture making them the very threat to our Constitution we have sworn to, "protect against all threats both foreign and domestic"...

Poland has denied entry into their country the immigration of Muslims and followers of the teachings of Muhamadd...Japam out of 10,000+ applications for immigrant or refugee status has allowed only 28 to enter... Both are currently the only countires on earth which may boast of no violence against their citizens from bombings, shootings, stabbings, rape and other crimes committed by those who have migrated to all other countries...

I do agree with your premise regarding the illegal immagration of Mexicans who also may have their own agenda of in essence doing the same under their doctrine of "La Raza". This faction of Mexicans believe that the territories which are now known as New Mexico, Arizona Part of Nevada and California as well as Texas were illegally obtained by the US and they seek to regain these areas and v**e them back into Mexican hands...

Anyone who attempts to justify the Muslim movement by accepting them as a religion has either not read the Qu'ran and the teachings of Muhammad or are simply to trusting and threaten their own existance by being to accepting of the enemy which seeks only to dominate and subjugate period...I am including below a list of accepted behaviors listed in the Qu'ran to achieve their goals and you decide if this is what you want to see in our country as acceptable behaior...



Reply
May 20, 2018 23:36:17   #
MICHAEL SALADEN
 
old marine wrote:
I seem to recall a post here with a link to a law passed in the early "50s prohibition Muslims from entering the United States.


Obummer had invited a bunch of his muslim friends and they just stayed and never left.

God bless America and President Trump


Actually, Obama was well aware of Public Law 414 and announced publically that he disagreed with the law and therefore would be ignoring it... This is a clear violation of his Oath of Office as well as Article II of the Constitution which defines the executive branches responsibilities to "faithfully Execute The Laws"... Making him a t*****r to our Constitution, Nation, and People...

In addition to ignoring Public Law 414, he ordered Border Patrol Agents along our Mexican border to stand down and allow unfettered access to the US by all comers... He also allegedly sent vans down near the border to pick up i******s crossing and facilitate their migrations deeper into America... This also by definition would make him guilty of treason for aiding and abetting the enemy...

Public Law 414 was passed June 27th, 1952 and was revised in 1967...

Reply
May 20, 2018 23:40:00   #
MICHAEL SALADEN
 
bggamers wrote:
I thought there was a law not to allow them in the country set up by Roosevelt I think not sure it's never been taken off it still stands


Public Law 414 Title II Chapter I Section 212 passed June 27th, 1952 and revised in 1967 clearly defines the criteria which deny entry to all those who seek immigrant, work visa status, or refugee status into America...

Reply
May 20, 2018 23:47:20   #
MICHAEL SALADEN
 
Loki wrote:
It wasn't just for Muslims. It was 1952. The president has authority to ban people or groups he has reasonable cause to believe intend to do the US harm.
It is spelled out in 8USC 1182

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182


That is correct and I never stated it was just for Muslims, I assert instead that it includes Muslims who are actively attacking our country via migration that Obama refused to recognize as he publically stated... It has caused a huge problem for Americans as well, that we can see now and which will only get worse if we do not address it immediately... Initially, it was written because of the spread of doctrines which threaten our way of life such as c*******m...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.