One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Giuliani: Mueller says Trump will not be indicted
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 16, 2018 20:33:39   #
EmilyD
 
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html

Reply
May 16, 2018 21:26:31   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
EmilyD wrote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed... (show quote)

You know you just pissed in the Democrats' punch bowl.

Reply
May 16, 2018 21:57:17   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
EmilyD wrote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed... (show quote)

Oh my God !!! The swamp dwelling Demon-Rat are going to go crazy. All that money they spent trying to destroy our beloved country and President wasted.

Haha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

God has blessed America again and President Trump

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2018 00:35:31   #
EmilyD
 
Super Dave wrote:
You know you just pissed in the Democrats' punch bowl.


That's the beauty of catering to them! They won't notice and we will be cheering each other with it!

Reply
May 17, 2018 09:49:32   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
EmilyD wrote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed... (show quote)


The day I listen to what Mueller can/may do or not do, or what he said/not said from someone OTHER than Mueller - is the day I register as a Democrat or Republican.

Reply
May 17, 2018 09:51:16   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
EmilyD wrote:
That's the beauty of catering to them! They won't notice and we will be cheering each other with it!




Keep in mind this is not a comment on guilt or innocence.. It is an opinion that the president is not subject to the law of the land..

He may or may not be correct. This will get tossed around for a while and then most likely be true.. The sitting president is not subject to all of our laws.. Just as congressmen..

However, this is also an attempt to counter the release of the Russian meeting with a number of trump inner group members.

These transcripts have been released and no doubt have unpleasant revelations about trump.

Just as it is now proven that he did provide the money, and more, to pay off stormy... We will keep find more and more nasty things about which he lies about claiming he did not do it or did not know about it..

His world is a world of lies and self serving.. the sooner he is rendered powerless the better for America and American v**ers..



Reply
May 17, 2018 09:53:22   #
bahmer
 
Super Dave wrote:
You know you just pissed in the Democrats' punch bowl.


Amen and Amen

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2018 11:24:16   #
Mike Easterday
 
This proves a liberal will throw other people's money at anything. Just to spend other people's money.

Reply
May 17, 2018 11:52:33   #
Lonewolf
 
trump is not above the law and committing a crime is grounds for impeachment not that I want him impeached that would leave us pence, we just need to neuter trump

Reply
May 17, 2018 13:33:24   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
trump is not above the law and committing a crime is grounds for impeachment not that I want him impeached that would leave us pence, we just need to neuter trump
Good luck with that, Mama's boy.

Reply
May 17, 2018 15:12:40   #
PulletSurprise Loc: Columbus, GA
 
The following is not for PFers.

Republican President G.W. Bush Jr. appointed Mueller.

Mueller has a sordid history of questionable and corrupt practices and investigations (in name only).
He's an Instigator, not a viable Investigator, who has been known to have victimized a number of innocent people. His ways and means can be closely associated with the KGB or the N**i’s Gestapo.
Mueller is enough to make any Progressive F*****t (PFers) Proud!

The following is only one example of Mueller’s work:

September 2001, an anonymous person(s) mailed anthrax targeting NBC and Senator Daschle’s office.
The unknown person(s) k**led five, rendering others to be hospitalized.
FBI investigation lasted ten years; spending millions of dollars and thousands of man hours as Mueller instigated this case.

The Anthrax package deliveries were initiated a week after the 9/11 attack. During the plans to assault NY City, Al-Qaeda’s Yazid Sufaat, constructed an Anthrax lab based in Afghanistan. 2 Terrorist who had handled the Anthrax in the U.S. sought medical help. Al Haznawi was treated in an emergency room for a skin lesion, claiming it was from “bumping into a suitcase” and the other, Mohamed Atta sought treatment for a “skin irritation.”
Johns Hopkins confirmed that Anthrax was the most likely cause of the lesion. The Terrorists also attempted to get their hands on ‘crop-dusters’ to fly dispensing their Anthrax poison over a large populations of U.S. Citizens!

October 2001, Mueller declared that the FBI had found “no direct link to organized terrorism” as victims lingered on their death beds. The Johns Hopkins team of experts had erred. Al Haznawi never contracted an Anthrax infection. The ‘crop-dusters’ conceivably were for another unrelated Anthrax attack???

Mueller and the FBI continued THEIR instigation. FBI EXPERTS DISCARDED THE TERRORISTS’ LETTERS AND WRITINGS IN BOLD BLOCK LETTERS, “Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great.”

Mueller’s FBI decided that the perpetrator was most likely a disgruntled American with bad personal sk**ls. They speculated that the attacker was a lonely American who had wanted to k**l people with anthrax and became “mission oriented” following 9/11. The disgruntled American instantaneously prepared and sent the deadly Anthrax out as he pretended to act as a Muslim.

Mueller’s FBI focused their attention on Steven Hatfill; a “f**g-waving” American Army Veteran.
Mr. Hatfill, after being honorably discharged, sought and DEDICATED HIS LIFE TO PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM BIO-TERRORIST THREATS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.

No Evidence connected Hatfill to the Anthrax attacks, except that he worked in an Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases as a Civil Service employee. FBI’s own admission, Hatfill was innocent.
But the FBI incessantly spied on, followed, and harassed Hatfill non-stop for years.
The Department of Justice publicly identified Hatfill as THE possible terrorist!

Hatfill effectively took legal action against the government for its unlawful actions. Hatfill was awarded nearly $6 million dollars for Mueller’s gestapo tactics in the U.S.A..

*Personal Note – Is it any wonder, Mr. Obama’s former appointed Homeland Security Director, Janet Napolitano, red-lined returning veterans as potential terrorists. Another PF team player.

Then the instigation moved to another researcher, Dr. Bruce Ivins, who from the onset offered his expertise, time and assistance to solve this case.
After 5 years into the Instigation, Dr. Ivins must have stepped on someone’s toes or looked at one of Mueller’s henchman the wrong way; Dr. Ivins advanced to be Mueller’s number ONE target!

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins was again based on flimsy, frivolous, speculative evidence. Prosecutor stated Dr. Ivins intentionally furnished a deceptive sample of anthrax spore, but Frontline documented this was not true. FBI stated that Dr. Ivins was “familiar” with the area from which the anthrax letters were mailed. Pulitzer Prize awarded ProPublica laid out Facts revealing that it was impossible for Dr. Ivins to make the trip to mail the letters.

The Anthrax spores used in the attacks were similar to the laboratory spores where Dr. Ivins worked, but the FBI Investigators (Instigators) ignored an UNIQUE ADDITIVE that was in the Anthrax letters. A scientist testified that the additive was so sophisticated and dangerous that it was most likely produced by another Nation or Al-Qaeda.

Dr. Ivins was never indicted, much less, tried! Mueller’s gestapo dogmatically assailed Dr. Ivins in every aspect of his life, just as they did Mr. Hatfill. Dr. Ivins’ home was invaded and ransacked; he was threatened in assorted fashions, ways and means or as his lawyer related, Dr. Ivins was induced to “relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo.”

...Dr. Ivins COMMITTED SUICIDE.

Mueller ordered an independent audit of the FBI’s case by the National Academy of Sciences, then formally closed the case in 2010. Mueller emphatically concluded that Dr. Ivins alone, committed the terror attack.
A year later, the National Academy of Sciences released their outcome, confirming what scientists had been repeating for years: the FBI’s science and conclusions were not solid... but flimsy.


A former FBI Official involved in the investigation sued the FBI, alleging the FBI concealed evidence exculpatory to Dr. Ivins.

Mueller made his position known, saying, “I do not apologize for any aspect of this investigation,” and that we didn’t make any mistakes.

Robert Mueller’s Inquisition has lasted nearly one and a half years without validity. The cost of this Inquisition could have been used in helping our less fortunate… the victims in our Nation’s disaster areas. Without interference, but upon request, if Hawaii requires Federal assistance, our hands will reach out to help our Brothers and Sisters.

If I had the Powers of the President, I’d immediately clean house with the Dept. of Justice starting with Mr. Sessions, Rosenstein, FBI Director Wray, Special counsel Robert Mueller and their lackeys for the good of our country.

I’d record and broadcast the decision for my actions succinctly from the White House Communication Center. I’d allow all journalist including the Major Medias to receive the broadcast. I would not cater to the Major Medias. My statement would be candid to the best of my ability TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. They would be my sole consideration!

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2018 15:18:33   #
jelun
 
Could you tell us why you would believe anything that Giuliani has to say? How many times has he been wrong in the past 2 weeks?


EmilyD wrote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed... (show quote)

Reply
May 17, 2018 15:23:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
jelun wrote:
Could you tell us why you would believe anything that Giuliani has to say? How many times has he been wrong in the past 2 weeks?


He hasn't really been wrong, just unclear/vague.

Reply
May 17, 2018 16:10:10   #
jelun
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
He hasn't really been wrong, just unclear/vague.


Seriously?

You don't really believe that this is true, do you?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/05/17/giuliani_mueller_acknowledged_he_doesnt_have_power_to_indict_impeachment_has_to_come_before_indictment.html

Reply
May 17, 2018 16:11:53   #
jelun
 
You understand that the investigation will not end before June of 2019?
Trump can be indicted in December of 2020.


EmilyD wrote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Giuliani. Therefore there would be no need for Mueller to subpoena Trump for an interview. Special counsel's team would have to show they need the President's testimony to investigate a crime of great significance. The President's team would argue that if you can't indict the President for a charge like obstruction, then there is no crime to justify the subpoena. If there were a "crime of great significance", it would have to have been committed by President Trump himself and not somebody else. There is no need to interview Trump if he can't be prosecuted.

You can find this news on other major news agencies, but I thought I'd quote CNN for Liberal's sake...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-indictment/index.html
Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.