More on the Stephanie Clifford (Stormy Daniels) case: trump HAS reported his payments to Michael Cohen on his 2017 financial disclosure form
The trump camp has taken the position that they don't believe the payments in question are in need of being reported, but are doing so for t***sparency.
However, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) drafted a decision letter to trump that the funds DID need to be reported.
After trump filed his 2017 form, the OGE sent that form along with the 2016 form, which they deemed was missing the required information, and referred the matter to the Justice Dept.Please note that there seems to remain some question as to whether all payments to Michael Cohen have been reported - - the figure reported fell between $101K and $250K, but comments which have been made might add up to a larger amount somewhere between $460K and $470K.
Watch "Ethics expert explains how Stormy Daniels payoff is trouble" on YouTube (5:02)
https://youtu.be/L1GJh5onJ10
tNotMyPrez wrote:
The trump camp has taken the position that they don't believe the payments in question are in need of being reported, but are doing so for t***sparency.
However, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) drafted a decision letter to trump that the funds DID need to be reported.
After trump filed his 2017 form, the OGE sent that form along with the 2016 form, which they deemed was missing the required information, and referred the matter to the Justice Dept.Please note that there seems to remain some question as to whether all payments to Michael Cohen have been reported - - the figure reported fell between $101K and $250K, but comments which have been made might add up to a larger amount somewhere between $460K and $470K.
Watch "Ethics expert explains how Stormy Daniels payoff is trouble" on YouTube (5:02)
https://youtu.be/L1GJh5onJ10 b The trump camp has taken the position that they... (
show quote)
OMG!!!!......Soooo what??? Old fricking news!!!1
this the payment the president been saying for weeks he knew nothing about
tNotMyPrez wrote:
The trump camp has taken the position that they don't believe the payments in question are in need of being reported, but are doing so for t***sparency.
However, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) drafted a decision letter to trump that the funds DID need to be reported.
After trump filed his 2017 form, the OGE sent that form along with the 2016 form, which they deemed was missing the required information, and referred the matter to the Justice Dept.Please note that there seems to remain some question as to whether all payments to Michael Cohen have been reported - - the figure reported fell between $101K and $250K, but comments which have been made might add up to a larger amount somewhere between $460K and $470K.
Watch "Ethics expert explains how Stormy Daniels payoff is trouble" on YouTube (5:02)
https://youtu.be/L1GJh5onJ10 b The trump camp has taken the position that they... (
show quote)
proud republican wrote:
OMG!!!!......Soooo what??? Old fricking news!!!1 ... (
show quote)
OMGosh - - you again - - and mistaken AGAIN...
WTH do you mean old friggin' news - - your boss has just admitted to something he previously asserted that he knew nothing about...
Why do you and your keep trying to cover up his multitudinous lies ???
Lonewolf wrote:
this the payment the president been saying for weeks he knew nothing about
Yes, that's exactly what it is, and there may be trouble brewing he didn't report the information on his 2016 form...
tNotMyPrez wrote:
OMGosh - - you again - - and mistaken AGAIN...
WTH do you mean old friggin' news - - your boss has just admitted to something he previously asserted that he knew nothing about...
Why do you and your keep trying to cover up his multitudinous lies ???
We already know about that President paid to Michael Cohen...He already admitted that before....
proud republican wrote:
We already know about that President paid to Michael Cohen...He already admitted that before....
Sorry PR - - I'm not sure that he did, although we all know that Rudy blurted it in his stead - - but these forms and the current disclosure in writing are significant, and if you can't see that, then you are just blindly following your leader - - a real shame.
tNotMyPrez wrote:
Sorry PR - - I'm not sure that he did, although we all know that Rudy blurted it in his stead - - but these forms and the current disclosure in writing are significant, and if you can't see that, then you are just blindly following your leader - - a real shame.
Im not saying that Trump is always right, in fact he hasnt been perfect....But your total h**e for President is covering your eyes so you cant see that he did a lot of good for US...And that is a shame,t
proud republican wrote:
Im not saying that Trump is always right, in fact he hasnt been perfect....But your total h**e for President is covering your eyes so you cant see that he did a lot of good for US...And that is a shame,t
You assume waaaay too much to accuse me or anyone else of hating anybody - - you can't even possibly know anonymous persons well enough to make that kind of claim. There is a difference between how I feel about people and how I feel about ideas - - I can violently opposed to an idea without hating a person who proposes it.
The t***h is that my Progressive philosophy and agenda is so radically different from yours that I don't believe trump, or the dominant right-wing Republi-CON Congress (either or both), has done virtually anything good for "us" or the US, which ever way you meant it. I really can neither see nor understand how anyone can be proud of being Republican these days.
A dear Republican friend of mine ask me about this financial reporting and, as I was explaining it to her, I got a reaction that I'm afraid is all too typical.
Basically, she said, "Well, she's just a WHORE (in a loudly sneering tone); why should we care about what she says?"
Well, we almost went to Fist City over this. So let me tell you what I think about that - - particularly as a feminist.
Historically, when prostitution is examined, why is it that it's the prostitutes who get in trouble, and usually not the johns (those men who are participating in 50/50 ways - - or even more so, depending on what "services" they've requested).
Ummm, takes two to tango...
Bottom line in all of this shyte with Stephanie Clifford and the trumpeter, I have heard these WHORE SNEERS too many times, but I haven't heard supporters of the orange C***to-in-Chief SNEERING "ADULTERER"...
Maybe you didn't hear it here first but:
ADULTERER
ADULTERER
ADULTERER
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.