One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
democrats tying to Dismantle The Constitution! A waste of time and energy!
May 16, 2018 12:03:33   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With This Bill


The founding fathers set up a democratic republic, which flies in the face of the modern liberal agenda.

Instead of adapting to the function of government that has prospered this nation since its inception, the left wants to experiment with ripping pages out of the book.

Their destructive policies are now moving on to the controversial debate of the E*******l College v**es.

The small state of Connecticut has made a bold move to do away with their E*******l College v**es in favor of the popular v**e.

Yahoo News reported:

“Connecticut’s legislature has passed a bill that would give the state’s E*******l College v**es to the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e nationally.

The state Senate v**ed 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.”

Joining the compact is saying that the states e*****rs are forced to cast their b****t for the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e in the nation.

Currently, constitutional law does not require the e*****rs to cast their b****ts for the state’s popular v**e, but with whom they feel is more qualified to meet their state’s needs and America’s needs.

The Hill reported on why there is an E*******l College instead of just depending on the most popular candidate of the people in the state:

“The Framers specifically designed the E*******l College to dilute democracy and favor the states. Democrats who disagree are at war with the federalism that the Framers hardwired throughout the Constitution itself.”

Framers are those men of the formative years of our country that helped shape the Constitution.

The Daily Wire goes on to explain the dangers in doing away with the process designed specifically for the preservation of a functional and cohesive government with the people:

“The reason why the framers designed the E*******l College as such was to prevent tyranny of the majority—emphasizing that the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The rights bestowed to the individual by God cannot be up for a majority v**e.”

Many citizens don’t understand exactly what an E*******l College is, or what its purpose is.

Being uninformed has caused some Americans to say they are in favor of moving strictly to the popular v**e for president without knowing the long term repercussions.

When v****g for the president of the United States, E*****rs are v**ed in by the people to cast their b****ts for president.

A state’s amount of E*******l College v**es is based on how many members of Congress that state has, plus their two senators.

The National Popular V**e Interstate Compact can’t go into effect until states that represent at least 270 e*******l v**es’ signs it; that being the amount needed for a candidate to win the presidency.

Once Governor Dannel Malloy of Connecticut signs the compact, which he pledges to do according to Yahoo News, 172 e*******l v**es will be included.

The other states that have already signed the compact include California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.

It is not surprising the liberal states that have signed the compact. These states aren’t worried because they know their popular v**es will be added to California’s always left leaning v****g pattern.

Malloy believes the E*******l College v****g system is “fundamentally unfair”, according to

Yahoo News.

This view stems from the idea that the individual should have the ultimate power, leaving out the republic portion of our government.

In order for each state to be considered equal members of the nation as a whole, the E*******l College must stay in place.

Mark Levin is a radio host and constitutional scholar, and during one of his shows highlighted on the Daily Wire he explained how we would have factionalism if we were to dismiss the process of validating a state’s position on the presidency.

On the p**********l campaign trail there would be no need to visit any states with low population because their v**es wouldn’t be enough in the popular v**e count to truly affect the outcome.

You would see a huge shift in focus on California and the east coast, while the concerns of the mid-west were ignored for lack of v**es.

Ending the E*******l College is only the beginning for the liberal agenda. Taking the power away from the states would be a step toward abolishing federalism.

Without the federal government getting in the way of the nefarious plans of progressives to label which lives are validated, establish limitless sexuality, and define what education should look like, they can rule the minds of our citizens.

The push for appealing the E*******l College was made when Trump took the victory with the E*******l College v**es, and not by popular v**e.

The left, and obviously Hillary herself, are still moping about their defeat and are trying to rig a system where they feel they will be unimpeded in future e******ns.

As legislation continues to be constructed to change our constitutional structure, we must stay vigilant to our fundamental beliefs and true to the rights bestowed by God not man.

It is a gross waste of energy......Our new Supreme Court will never let it happen unless they change the Constitution!!!!!

Reply
May 16, 2018 12:13:13   #
bahmer
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With This Bill


The founding fathers set up a democratic republic, which flies in the face of the modern liberal agenda.

Instead of adapting to the function of government that has prospered this nation since its inception, the left wants to experiment with ripping pages out of the book.

Their destructive policies are now moving on to the controversial debate of the E*******l College v**es.

The small state of Connecticut has made a bold move to do away with their E*******l College v**es in favor of the popular v**e.

Yahoo News reported:

“Connecticut’s legislature has passed a bill that would give the state’s E*******l College v**es to the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e nationally.

The state Senate v**ed 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.”

Joining the compact is saying that the states e*****rs are forced to cast their b****t for the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e in the nation.

Currently, constitutional law does not require the e*****rs to cast their b****ts for the state’s popular v**e, but with whom they feel is more qualified to meet their state’s needs and America’s needs.

The Hill reported on why there is an E*******l College instead of just depending on the most popular candidate of the people in the state:

“The Framers specifically designed the E*******l College to dilute democracy and favor the states. Democrats who disagree are at war with the federalism that the Framers hardwired throughout the Constitution itself.”

Framers are those men of the formative years of our country that helped shape the Constitution.

The Daily Wire goes on to explain the dangers in doing away with the process designed specifically for the preservation of a functional and cohesive government with the people:

“The reason why the framers designed the E*******l College as such was to prevent tyranny of the majority—emphasizing that the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The rights bestowed to the individual by God cannot be up for a majority v**e.”

Many citizens don’t understand exactly what an E*******l College is, or what its purpose is.

Being uninformed has caused some Americans to say they are in favor of moving strictly to the popular v**e for president without knowing the long term repercussions.

When v****g for the president of the United States, E*****rs are v**ed in by the people to cast their b****ts for president.

A state’s amount of E*******l College v**es is based on how many members of Congress that state has, plus their two senators.

The National Popular V**e Interstate Compact can’t go into effect until states that represent at least 270 e*******l v**es’ signs it; that being the amount needed for a candidate to win the presidency.

Once Governor Dannel Malloy of Connecticut signs the compact, which he pledges to do according to Yahoo News, 172 e*******l v**es will be included.

The other states that have already signed the compact include California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.

It is not surprising the liberal states that have signed the compact. These states aren’t worried because they know their popular v**es will be added to California’s always left leaning v****g pattern.

Malloy believes the E*******l College v****g system is “fundamentally unfair”, according to

Yahoo News.

This view stems from the idea that the individual should have the ultimate power, leaving out the republic portion of our government.

In order for each state to be considered equal members of the nation as a whole, the E*******l College must stay in place.

Mark Levin is a radio host and constitutional scholar, and during one of his shows highlighted on the Daily Wire he explained how we would have factionalism if we were to dismiss the process of validating a state’s position on the presidency.

On the p**********l campaign trail there would be no need to visit any states with low population because their v**es wouldn’t be enough in the popular v**e count to truly affect the outcome.

You would see a huge shift in focus on California and the east coast, while the concerns of the mid-west were ignored for lack of v**es.

Ending the E*******l College is only the beginning for the liberal agenda. Taking the power away from the states would be a step toward abolishing federalism.

Without the federal government getting in the way of the nefarious plans of progressives to label which lives are validated, establish limitless sexuality, and define what education should look like, they can rule the minds of our citizens.

The push for appealing the E*******l College was made when Trump took the victory with the E*******l College v**es, and not by popular v**e.

The left, and obviously Hillary herself, are still moping about their defeat and are trying to rig a system where they feel they will be unimpeded in future e******ns.

As legislation continues to be constructed to change our constitutional structure, we must stay vigilant to our fundamental beliefs and true to the rights bestowed by God not man.

It is a gross waste of energy......Our new Supreme Court will never let it happen unless they change the Constitution!!!!!
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With ... (show quote)


It appears that the US senate should resolve this issue and get us back to the constitution or at the very least wait until the supreme court is truly conservative and have them rule on this to see if this is legal for the states to do. Maybe if the supreme court would strike down the states that would suffice if not maybe a law from the senate would be requires.

Reply
May 16, 2018 12:19:56   #
Carol Kelly
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With This Bill


The founding fathers set up a democratic republic, which flies in the face of the modern liberal agenda.

Instead of adapting to the function of government that has prospered this nation since its inception, the left wants to experiment with ripping pages out of the book.

Their destructive policies are now moving on to the controversial debate of the E*******l College v**es.

The small state of Connecticut has made a bold move to do away with their E*******l College v**es in favor of the popular v**e.

Yahoo News reported:

“Connecticut’s legislature has passed a bill that would give the state’s E*******l College v**es to the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e nationally.

The state Senate v**ed 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.”

Joining the compact is saying that the states e*****rs are forced to cast their b****t for the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e in the nation.

Currently, constitutional law does not require the e*****rs to cast their b****ts for the state’s popular v**e, but with whom they feel is more qualified to meet their state’s needs and America’s needs.

The Hill reported on why there is an E*******l College instead of just depending on the most popular candidate of the people in the state:

“The Framers specifically designed the E*******l College to dilute democracy and favor the states. Democrats who disagree are at war with the federalism that the Framers hardwired throughout the Constitution itself.”

Framers are those men of the formative years of our country that helped shape the Constitution.

The Daily Wire goes on to explain the dangers in doing away with the process designed specifically for the preservation of a functional and cohesive government with the people:

“The reason why the framers designed the E*******l College as such was to prevent tyranny of the majority—emphasizing that the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The rights bestowed to the individual by God cannot be up for a majority v**e.”

Many citizens don’t understand exactly what an E*******l College is, or what its purpose is.

Being uninformed has caused some Americans to say they are in favor of moving strictly to the popular v**e for president without knowing the long term repercussions.

When v****g for the president of the United States, E*****rs are v**ed in by the people to cast their b****ts for president.

A state’s amount of E*******l College v**es is based on how many members of Congress that state has, plus their two senators.

The National Popular V**e Interstate Compact can’t go into effect until states that represent at least 270 e*******l v**es’ signs it; that being the amount needed for a candidate to win the presidency.

Once Governor Dannel Malloy of Connecticut signs the compact, which he pledges to do according to Yahoo News, 172 e*******l v**es will be included.

The other states that have already signed the compact include California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.

It is not surprising the liberal states that have signed the compact. These states aren’t worried because they know their popular v**es will be added to California’s always left leaning v****g pattern.

Malloy believes the E*******l College v****g system is “fundamentally unfair”, according to

Yahoo News.

This view stems from the idea that the individual should have the ultimate power, leaving out the republic portion of our government.

In order for each state to be considered equal members of the nation as a whole, the E*******l College must stay in place.

Mark Levin is a radio host and constitutional scholar, and during one of his shows highlighted on the Daily Wire he explained how we would have factionalism if we were to dismiss the process of validating a state’s position on the presidency.

On the p**********l campaign trail there would be no need to visit any states with low population because their v**es wouldn’t be enough in the popular v**e count to truly affect the outcome.

You would see a huge shift in focus on California and the east coast, while the concerns of the mid-west were ignored for lack of v**es.

Ending the E*******l College is only the beginning for the liberal agenda. Taking the power away from the states would be a step toward abolishing federalism.

Without the federal government getting in the way of the nefarious plans of progressives to label which lives are validated, establish limitless sexuality, and define what education should look like, they can rule the minds of our citizens.

The push for appealing the E*******l College was made when Trump took the victory with the E*******l College v**es, and not by popular v**e.

The left, and obviously Hillary herself, are still moping about their defeat and are trying to rig a system where they feel they will be unimpeded in future e******ns.

As legislation continues to be constructed to change our constitutional structure, we must stay vigilant to our fundamental beliefs and true to the rights bestowed by God not man.

It is a gross waste of energy......Our new Supreme Court will never let it happen unless they change the Constitution!!!!!
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With ... (show quote)



This is really frightening. We shouldn’t just sit on the sidelines and allow this pile of dung to grow until it overtakes us and ch@nges us forever. Can’t depend on NEW Supreme Court, never again.

Reply
 
 
May 16, 2018 13:47:09   #
moldyoldy
 
There is a good reason for amendments, the founding fathers knew that over time changes would be needed.

Reply
May 16, 2018 14:30:52   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
moldyoldy wrote:
There is a good reason for amendments, the founding fathers knew that over time changes would be needed.


moldy: When are they going to change you?

Reply
May 16, 2018 14:52:57   #
bahmer
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
moldy: When are they going to change you?


He has had the same diaper on for thirty years now at least.

Reply
May 16, 2018 22:30:05   #
Radiance3
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With This Bill


The founding fathers set up a democratic republic, which flies in the face of the modern liberal agenda.

Instead of adapting to the function of government that has prospered this nation since its inception, the left wants to experiment with ripping pages out of the book.

Their destructive policies are now moving on to the controversial debate of the E*******l College v**es.

The small state of Connecticut has made a bold move to do away with their E*******l College v**es in favor of the popular v**e.

Yahoo News reported:

“Connecticut’s legislature has passed a bill that would give the state’s E*******l College v**es to the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e nationally.

The state Senate v**ed 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.”

Joining the compact is saying that the states e*****rs are forced to cast their b****t for the p**********l candidate who wins the popular v**e in the nation.

Currently, constitutional law does not require the e*****rs to cast their b****ts for the state’s popular v**e, but with whom they feel is more qualified to meet their state’s needs and America’s needs.

The Hill reported on why there is an E*******l College instead of just depending on the most popular candidate of the people in the state:

“The Framers specifically designed the E*******l College to dilute democracy and favor the states. Democrats who disagree are at war with the federalism that the Framers hardwired throughout the Constitution itself.”

Framers are those men of the formative years of our country that helped shape the Constitution.

The Daily Wire goes on to explain the dangers in doing away with the process designed specifically for the preservation of a functional and cohesive government with the people:

“The reason why the framers designed the E*******l College as such was to prevent tyranny of the majority—emphasizing that the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The rights bestowed to the individual by God cannot be up for a majority v**e.”

Many citizens don’t understand exactly what an E*******l College is, or what its purpose is.

Being uninformed has caused some Americans to say they are in favor of moving strictly to the popular v**e for president without knowing the long term repercussions.

When v****g for the president of the United States, E*****rs are v**ed in by the people to cast their b****ts for president.

A state’s amount of E*******l College v**es is based on how many members of Congress that state has, plus their two senators.

The National Popular V**e Interstate Compact can’t go into effect until states that represent at least 270 e*******l v**es’ signs it; that being the amount needed for a candidate to win the presidency.

Once Governor Dannel Malloy of Connecticut signs the compact, which he pledges to do according to Yahoo News, 172 e*******l v**es will be included.

The other states that have already signed the compact include California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.

It is not surprising the liberal states that have signed the compact. These states aren’t worried because they know their popular v**es will be added to California’s always left leaning v****g pattern.

Malloy believes the E*******l College v****g system is “fundamentally unfair”, according to

Yahoo News.

This view stems from the idea that the individual should have the ultimate power, leaving out the republic portion of our government.

In order for each state to be considered equal members of the nation as a whole, the E*******l College must stay in place.

Mark Levin is a radio host and constitutional scholar, and during one of his shows highlighted on the Daily Wire he explained how we would have factionalism if we were to dismiss the process of validating a state’s position on the presidency.

On the p**********l campaign trail there would be no need to visit any states with low population because their v**es wouldn’t be enough in the popular v**e count to truly affect the outcome.

You would see a huge shift in focus on California and the east coast, while the concerns of the mid-west were ignored for lack of v**es.

Ending the E*******l College is only the beginning for the liberal agenda. Taking the power away from the states would be a step toward abolishing federalism.

Without the federal government getting in the way of the nefarious plans of progressives to label which lives are validated, establish limitless sexuality, and define what education should look like, they can rule the minds of our citizens.

The push for appealing the E*******l College was made when Trump took the victory with the E*******l College v**es, and not by popular v**e.

The left, and obviously Hillary herself, are still moping about their defeat and are trying to rig a system where they feel they will be unimpeded in future e******ns.

As legislation continues to be constructed to change our constitutional structure, we must stay vigilant to our fundamental beliefs and true to the rights bestowed by God not man.

It is a gross waste of energy......Our new Supreme Court will never let it happen unless they change the Constitution!!!!!
Democrats Look To Dismantle The Constitution With ... (show quote)

================
The democrats under the power of the Deep State has been working to replace the constitution with "political correctness" with the Sharia Law,under Islam, Obama's religion of peace.

That has been "Obama's Hope and Change", you can believe in.

If democrats become the majority in Congress in 2018, this could finalize the process. Please don't allow this to happen. Sharia Law will slowly grip into all of our lives from kids in schools to colleges and universities.

V**e REPUBLICANS in Nov. 2018.

Those women democrats, do you want to be s***es or beaten? Your naked body will see no longer the face of the earth.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.