One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Dismantling of America By The Left...
May 9, 2018 13:49:21   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
I'm Becoming Convinced The Left Really Wants a "Civil War" With The Patriotic Right, They Will Settle For Nothing Less Than Total Control of All Americans... Don D.

Here is a Result of Dodd-Frank And a Continuing of America's Dismantlement........

If you do not know, you will soon, that criminals guilty of treason are in control of American government positions, and using ploys like mentioned below to prevent their prosecution for treason. This may be over the heads of most, but that doe not change the fact.

America's federal constitution is not negotiable, yet government criminals in the group, are refusing to use the 'Law of the Land' as directed.

There can not be a compact of states planning to violate America's 'Law of the Land', but there seems to be one. Are the American People going to let this happen? If they do, they deserve what is to come in the near future. Plan to bow to the east three times a day with your ass in the air, if you will not fight for the constitution.

A letter a day to the president for many People will help.

Here is the article, if you do not shed a tear, you are the problem:

Connecticut To Give Its E*******l College V**es To National Popular V**e Victor

Reply
May 9, 2018 17:40:57   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
I'm Becoming Convinced The Left Really Wants a "Civil War" With The Patriotic Right, They Will Settle For Nothing Less Than Total Control of All Americans... Don D.

Here is a Result of Dodd-Frank And a Continuing of America's Dismantlement........

If you do not know, you will soon, that criminals guilty of treason are in control of American government positions, and using ploys like mentioned below to prevent their prosecution for treason. This may be over the heads of most, but that doe not change the fact.

America's federal constitution is not negotiable, yet government criminals in the group, are refusing to use the 'Law of the Land' as directed.

There can not be a compact of states planning to violate America's 'Law of the Land', but there seems to be one. Are the American People going to let this happen? If they do, they deserve what is to come in the near future. Plan to bow to the east three times a day with your ass in the air, if you will not fight for the constitution.

A letter a day to the president for many People will help.

Here is the article, if you do not shed a tear, you are the problem:

Connecticut To Give Its E*******l College V**es To National Popular V**e Victor
I'm Becoming Convinced The Left Really Wants a &qu... (show quote)


So the Democrats have found a new way to rig an e******n. Perhaps we should agitate for automatic secession if the popular v**e in our states isn't for the candidate who gets the e*******l,v**es.

Reply
May 9, 2018 21:02:26   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
In The Last Several E******n, Particularly 2016, Two States Would Have Dictated The Winner For The Rest of America, And There Was Evidence After The Fact Conveniently, That There Were Major Irregularities, That's Why The E*******l College Is The Correct Way For America To Be Represented Fairly... Don D.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pafret wrote:
So the Democrats have found a new way to rig an e******n. Perhaps we should agitate for automatic secession if the popular v**e in our states isn't for the candidate who gets the e*******l,v**es.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2018 23:46:00   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
In The Last Several E******n, Particularly 2016, Two States Would Have Dictated The Winner For The Rest of America, And There Was Evidence After The Fact Conveniently, That There Were Major Irregularities, That's Why The E*******l College Is The Correct Way For America To Be Represented Fairly... Don D.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From what I read this is a ten state coalition all of whom will give the e*******l college v**es to the popular v**e winner. With the states with the megacities all going Democrat, this will negate the intention of the founding fathers to prevent exactly this situation. The E*******l College was the means to negate the popular v**e which is concentrated in a tiny portion of this nation.

Reply
May 10, 2018 08:45:16   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
Trump Beat Clinton by 3 Million Outside of California and New York

By Jack Phillips ~ December 21, 2016

Hillary Clinton in Dade City, Florida, on Nov. 1, 2016, and Donald Trump in Warren, Michigan in Warren, Michigan, on Oct. 31, 2016. (JEWEL SAMAD,JEFF

According to a new figures, without California and New York, President-elect Donald Trump would have defeated rival Hillary Clinton by around 3 million v**es. The Cook Political Report on Tuesday, in its final update, said Clinton won by more than 2.8 million v**es. Trump also took the E*******l College with 306 v**es to Clinton’s 232.

She won California by 4.2 million v**es and won New York by 1.6 million, which is a net 5.8 million advantage in those two states.

On Tuesday, Trump again tweeted about the E*******l College, saying it is “much more difficult” and more “sophisticated” to win e*******l v**es than winning the popular v**e. “Hillary focused on the wrong states!” he added.

“I would have done even better in the e******n, if that is possible if the winner was based on popular v**e—but would campaign differently,” he wrote. “I have not heard any of the pundits or commentators discussing the fact that I spent FAR LESS MONEY on the win than Hillary on the loss!” he also wrote.

Federal e******n filings show Trump spent about $600 million and Clinton spent some $1.2 billion during the campaign season. During the final weeks of the campaign, starting from Oct. 20, Trump spent $94.5 million, as compared with Clinton’s $131.8 million, according to The Associated Press. After the e******n, Clinton has $839,000 in her coffers while Trump has $7.6 million, the report said.

Following the e******n result, some have pushed for the abolition of the E*******l College. A few days after Nov. 8, Democratic Sen. Barabara Boxer, of California, introduced a bill to end the e*******l system—which is written into the U.S Constitution.

“In my lifetime, I have seen two e******ns where the winner of the general e******n did not win the popular v**e,” the lifelong Democratic senator said in a statement on her website last month, referring to Trump’s win and Al Gore’s loss to George W. Bush in 2000. Gore won by about 500,000 v**es while Bush took the E*******l College.

Related Coverage

Trump Beat Clinton by 3 Million Outside of California and New YorkPopular V**e Update: Latest Numbers for Trump, Clinton Come In
The New York Times on Monday, as e*****rs certified Trump’s victory, wrote an opinion piece that said the E*******l College should be done away with.

“Today the college, which allocates e*****rs based on each state’s representation in Congress, tips the scales in favor of smaller states; a Wyoming resident’s v**e counts 3.6 times as much as a Californian’s,” the paper wrote. Wyoming, which has a population of 584,000, typically v**es Republican during p**********l e******ns. “And because almost all states use a winner-take-all system, the e******n ends up being fought in just a dozen or so ‘battleground’ states, leaving tens of millions of Americans on the sidelines.”

But Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Wednesday criticized those who are calling for the abolition of the institution.

“This is football season. A team can have more yards and lose the game. What matters is how many points you put on the board. The E*******l College is the points,” he said on “Fox & Friends.”

He added: “Trump actually carried—in the 49 states outside of California, he had a 1.2 million v**e majority. He got k**led in California because he never campaigned there.”




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pafret wrote:
From what I read this is a ten state coalition all of whom will give the e*******l college v**es to the popular v**e winner. With the states with the megacities all going Democrat, this will negate the intention of the founding fathers to prevent exactly this situation. The E*******l College was the means to negate the popular v**e which is concentrated in a tiny portion of this nation.

Reply
May 10, 2018 11:50:26   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Trump Beat Clinton by 3 Million Outside of California and New York

By Jack Phillips ~ December 21, 2016

Hillary Clinton in Dade City, Florida, on Nov. 1, 2016, and Donald Trump in Warren, Michigan in Warren, Michigan, on Oct. 31, 2016. (JEWEL SAMAD,JEFF

According to a new figures, without California and New York, President-elect Donald Trump would have defeated rival Hillary Clinton by around 3 million v**es. The Cook Political Report on Tuesday, in its final update, said Clinton won by more than 2.8 million v**es. Trump also took the E*******l College with 306 v**es to Clinton’s 232.

She won California by 4.2 million v**es and won New York by 1.6 million, which is a net 5.8 million advantage in those two states.

On Tuesday, Trump again tweeted about the E*******l College, saying it is “much more difficult” and more “sophisticated” to win e*******l v**es than winning the popular v**e. “Hillary focused on the wrong states!” he added.

“I would have done even better in the e******n, if that is possible if the winner was based on popular v**e—but would campaign differently,” he wrote. “I have not heard any of the pundits or commentators discussing the fact that I spent FAR LESS MONEY on the win than Hillary on the loss!” he also wrote.

Federal e******n filings show Trump spent about $600 million and Clinton spent some $1.2 billion during the campaign season. During the final weeks of the campaign, starting from Oct. 20, Trump spent $94.5 million, as compared with Clinton’s $131.8 million, according to The Associated Press. After the e******n, Clinton has $839,000 in her coffers while Trump has $7.6 million, the report said.

Following the e******n result, some have pushed for the abolition of the E*******l College. A few days after Nov. 8, Democratic Sen. Barabara Boxer, of California, introduced a bill to end the e*******l system—which is written into the U.S Constitution.

“In my lifetime, I have seen two e******ns where the winner of the general e******n did not win the popular v**e,” the lifelong Democratic senator said in a statement on her website last month, referring to Trump’s win and Al Gore’s loss to George W. Bush in 2000. Gore won by about 500,000 v**es while Bush took the E*******l College.

Related Coverage

Trump Beat Clinton by 3 Million Outside of California and New YorkPopular V**e Update: Latest Numbers for Trump, Clinton Come In
The New York Times on Monday, as e*****rs certified Trump’s victory, wrote an opinion piece that said the E*******l College should be done away with.

“Today the college, which allocates e*****rs based on each state’s representation in Congress, tips the scales in favor of smaller states; a Wyoming resident’s v**e counts 3.6 times as much as a Californian’s,” the paper wrote. Wyoming, which has a population of 584,000, typically v**es Republican during p**********l e******ns. “And because almost all states use a winner-take-all system, the e******n ends up being fought in just a dozen or so ‘battleground’ states, leaving tens of millions of Americans on the sidelines.”

But Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Wednesday criticized those who are calling for the abolition of the institution.

“This is football season. A team can have more yards and lose the game. What matters is how many points you put on the board. The E*******l College is the points,” he said on “Fox & Friends.”

He added: “Trump actually carried—in the 49 states outside of California, he had a 1.2 million v**e majority. He got k**led in California because he never campaigned there.”




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trump Beat Clinton by 3 Million Outside of Califor... (show quote)


I'm posting an interesting piece on why large cities v**e Democrat (Too large to add in here). It uses Manhattan but the points made are very likely valid for all major cities.

The Title: Why Does Manhattan V**e Overwhelmingly Democratic?

This piece should provide some perspective on why disemboweling the E*******l College is an extremely bad idea.

Reply
May 10, 2018 12:02:50   #
bahmer
 
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
I'm Becoming Convinced The Left Really Wants a "Civil War" With The Patriotic Right, They Will Settle For Nothing Less Than Total Control of All Americans... Don D.

Here is a Result of Dodd-Frank And a Continuing of America's Dismantlement........

If you do not know, you will soon, that criminals guilty of treason are in control of American government positions, and using ploys like mentioned below to prevent their prosecution for treason. This may be over the heads of most, but that doe not change the fact.

America's federal constitution is not negotiable, yet government criminals in the group, are refusing to use the 'Law of the Land' as directed.

There can not be a compact of states planning to violate America's 'Law of the Land', but there seems to be one. Are the American People going to let this happen? If they do, they deserve what is to come in the near future. Plan to bow to the east three times a day with your ass in the air, if you will not fight for the constitution.

A letter a day to the president for many People will help.

Here is the article, if you do not shed a tear, you are the problem:

Connecticut To Give Its E*******l College V**es To National Popular V**e Victor
I'm Becoming Convinced The Left Really Wants a &qu... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.