One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What is your least favorite political ideology?
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
May 6, 2018 14:29:27   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your least favorite political ideology?

Led by Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge started out as a peasant, C*******t guerrillas who saw Mao’s Marxist revolution driven by the peasantry, rather than the Proletariat, and decided that this was too moderate. Pol Pot didn’t just embrace the peasantry, he viewed their agrarian lifestyle as the only valid way of life. Upon taking power, he forced everyone to leave Cambodia’s cities and take up the life of a peasant farmer, closing anything perceived as modern, such as schools and hospitals. Those who refused, or even those who were perceived as not working hard enough, were k**led by Khmer Rouge thugs. As if that wasn’t bad enough, the result of forcing a bunch of people with no experience in farming to farm was, predictably, famine. Not even the peasants could fully keep up with the Khmer Rouge’s quotas, though; the yield they required was a threefold increase on the yield before their rise to power. In short, the Khmer Rouge forced an entire country’s population into s***ery.

As if the s***ery wasn’t bad enough there were some people who simply couldn't avoid being outright murdered. Royalty, the nobility, the rich, intellectuals- there was simply no hope for them. Of course, it wasn’t enough to massacre class enemies; their methods of determining if one was a class enemy were comical if they weren’t the cause of the death of hundreds of thousands. Those with glasses were massacred, as were writers, musicians, and filmmakers. Pol Pot, a hypocrite as well as a monster, was a fan of literature himself. By the end of the regime, almost no one left alive was literate. The Khmer Rouge is a chilling look at what happens when a class is truly almost wiped out.

As if all of this wasn’t enough… they were also r****t. They carried out genocide against Cambodia’s minorities, primarily the Thai, Chinese, and Vietnamese. This last one brought about their downfall; Vietnam, outraged over the massacres of their people, invaded Cambodia(sickeningly, China supported Pol Pot despite the massacre of their people). Most of Cambodia was liberated in less than a month, although holdouts of the Khmer Rouge still resist in the jungles of Cambodia to this day. Fortunately, they aren’t much more than an annoyance. The Khmer Rouge are the only ideology I can honestly say made literally no positive contributions. Their ideology was entirely built around hatred, insanity, and a desire for power. For this reason, Pol Pot’s C*******m is my least favorite ideology.

I have to wonder if Bernie Sanders is up on this.

But I am sure Bad Bob and Kyven and even Frostbite will disagree with me.

Reply
May 6, 2018 14:39:21   #
Manning345 Loc: Richmond, Virginia
 
cold iron wrote:
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your least favorite political ideology?

Led by Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge started out as a peasant, C*******t guerrillas who saw Mao’s Marxist revolution driven by the peasantry, rather than the Proletariat, and decided that this was too moderate. Pol Pot didn’t just embrace the peasantry, he viewed their agrarian lifestyle as the only valid way of life. Upon taking power, he forced everyone to leave Cambodia’s cities and take up the life of a peasant farmer, closing anything perceived as modern, such as schools and hospitals. Those who refused, or even those who were perceived as not working hard enough, were k**led by Khmer Rouge thugs. As if that wasn’t bad enough, the result of forcing a bunch of people with no experience in farming to farm was, predictably, famine. Not even the peasants could fully keep up with the Khmer Rouge’s quotas, though; the yield they required was a threefold increase on the yield before their rise to power. In short, the Khmer Rouge forced an entire country’s population into s***ery.

As if the s***ery wasn’t bad enough there were some people who simply couldn't avoid being outright murdered. Royalty, the nobility, the rich, intellectuals- there was simply no hope for them. Of course, it wasn’t enough to massacre class enemies; their methods of determining if one was a class enemy were comical if they weren’t the cause of the death of hundreds of thousands. Those with glasses were massacred, as were writers, musicians, and filmmakers. Pol Pot, a hypocrite as well as a monster, was a fan of literature himself. By the end of the regime, almost no one left alive was literate. The Khmer Rouge is a chilling look at what happens when a class is truly almost wiped out.

As if all of this wasn’t enough… they were also r****t. They carried out genocide against Cambodia’s minorities, primarily the Thai, Chinese, and Vietnamese. This last one brought about their downfall; Vietnam, outraged over the massacres of their people, invaded Cambodia(sickeningly, China supported Pol Pot despite the massacre of their people). Most of Cambodia was liberated in less than a month, although holdouts of the Khmer Rouge still resist in the jungles of Cambodia to this day. Fortunately, they aren’t much more than an annoyance. The Khmer Rouge are the only ideology I can honestly say made literally no positive contributions. Their ideology was entirely built around hatred, insanity, and a desire for power. For this reason, Pol Pot’s C*******m is my least favorite ideology.

I have to wonder if Bernie Sanders is up on this.

But I am sure Bad Bob and Kyven and even Frostbite will disagree with me.
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your l... (show quote)


Pol Pot is a good start. I will add, in no special order:
Secular Humanism
Progressivism
Socialism
C*******m of all other kinds
Dictatorships
These ideologies are mainly driven by atheists that deny God.

Reply
May 6, 2018 15:09:23   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Manning345 wrote:
Pol Pot is a good start. I will add, in no special order:
Secular Humanism
Progressivism
Socialism
C*******m of all other kinds
Dictatorships
These ideologies are mainly driven by atheists that deny God.


Well, put.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2018 15:19:28   #
son of witless
 
cold iron wrote:
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your least favorite political ideology?

Led by Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge started out as a peasant, C*******t guerrillas who saw Mao’s Marxist revolution driven by the peasantry, rather than the Proletariat, and decided that this was too moderate. Pol Pot didn’t just embrace the peasantry, he viewed their agrarian lifestyle as the only valid way of life. Upon taking power, he forced everyone to leave Cambodia’s cities and take up the life of a peasant farmer, closing anything perceived as modern, such as schools and hospitals. Those who refused, or even those who were perceived as not working hard enough, were k**led by Khmer Rouge thugs. As if that wasn’t bad enough, the result of forcing a bunch of people with no experience in farming to farm was, predictably, famine. Not even the peasants could fully keep up with the Khmer Rouge’s quotas, though; the yield they required was a threefold increase on the yield before their rise to power. In short, the Khmer Rouge forced an entire country’s population into s***ery.

As if the s***ery wasn’t bad enough there were some people who simply couldn't avoid being outright murdered. Royalty, the nobility, the rich, intellectuals- there was simply no hope for them. Of course, it wasn’t enough to massacre class enemies; their methods of determining if one was a class enemy were comical if they weren’t the cause of the death of hundreds of thousands. Those with glasses were massacred, as were writers, musicians, and filmmakers. Pol Pot, a hypocrite as well as a monster, was a fan of literature himself. By the end of the regime, almost no one left alive was literate. The Khmer Rouge is a chilling look at what happens when a class is truly almost wiped out.

As if all of this wasn’t enough… they were also r****t. They carried out genocide against Cambodia’s minorities, primarily the Thai, Chinese, and Vietnamese. This last one brought about their downfall; Vietnam, outraged over the massacres of their people, invaded Cambodia(sickeningly, China supported Pol Pot despite the massacre of their people). Most of Cambodia was liberated in less than a month, although holdouts of the Khmer Rouge still resist in the jungles of Cambodia to this day. Fortunately, they aren’t much more than an annoyance. The Khmer Rouge are the only ideology I can honestly say made literally no positive contributions. Their ideology was entirely built around hatred, insanity, and a desire for power. For this reason, Pol Pot’s C*******m is my least favorite ideology.

I have to wonder if Bernie Sanders is up on this.

But I am sure Bad Bob and Kyven and even Frostbite will disagree with me.
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your l... (show quote)


When your fellow C*******ts take you out, you are pretty far out there. It is similar to the 1930s Dutch Schultz murder. The guy was such a Jack Ass and wanted to eliminate the Prosecutor Thomas Dewey. Lucky Luciano and the rest of the Mob Syndicate decided instead to murder Dutch Schultz.

Reply
May 6, 2018 17:09:00   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
son of witless wrote:
When your fellow C*******ts take you out, you are pretty far out there. It is similar to the 1930s Dutch Schultz murder. The guy was such a Jack Ass and wanted to eliminate the Prosecutor Thomas Dewey. Lucky Luciano and the rest of the Mob Syndicate decided instead to murder Dutch Schultz.



I don't have any fellow C*******ts! Do you? And what the hell are you talking about?

Reply
May 6, 2018 17:16:09   #
woodguru
 
My least favorite is hard conservatism, especially on the bench where judges lean well into their personal views rather than the law. I find an unashamedly conservative supreme court to be the worst, and the right sees any that don't v**e hard right to be liberal when the opposition may be based on sound law.

That hard conservative ideology is bringing too many religiously based concepts into law. A hard conservative judge will put their religious beliefs ahead of the constitution when they conflict, and will defend their right to do so.

Reply
May 6, 2018 17:43:08   #
son of witless
 
cold iron wrote:
I don't have any fellow C*******ts! Do you? And what the hell are you talking about?


I meant C*******t Vietnam took out the C*******t Khmer Rouge. One C*******t taking out another. Sorry for my poor choice of words.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2018 22:34:01   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
woodguru wrote:
My least favorite is hard conservatism, especially on the bench where judges lean well into their personal views rather than the law. I find an unashamedly conservative supreme court to be the worst, and the right sees any that don't v**e hard right to be liberal when the opposition may be based on sound law.

That hard conservative ideology is bringing too many religiously based concepts into law. A hard conservative judge will put their religious beliefs ahead of the constitution when they conflict, and will defend their right to do so.
My least favorite is hard conservatism, especially... (show quote)


My least favorite is the American Democratic Party, especially on the bench where judges lean well into their personal views rather than the CONSTITUTION, which is the law of the land. I find an unashamedly Liberal supreme court to be the worst, which is based on anti American HATRED, instead of the law as intended by the original founders.

That hard conservative ideology is bringing CONSTITUTIONAL LAW back into the law of the land, instead of a liberal, anti american judges "opinion" that leans toward antiamericanism, and destruction of America instead.

Reply
May 6, 2018 22:35:37   #
PLT Sarge Loc: Alabama
 
Damn Cold you nailed it. How much of this can be applied to what is happing in our country now ?
cold iron wrote:
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your least favorite political ideology?

Led by Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge started out as a peasant, C*******t guerrillas who saw Mao’s Marxist revolution driven by the peasantry, rather than the Proletariat, and decided that this was too moderate. Pol Pot didn’t just embrace the peasantry, he viewed their agrarian lifestyle as the only valid way of life. Upon taking power, he forced everyone to leave Cambodia’s cities and take up the life of a peasant farmer, closing anything perceived as modern, such as schools and hospitals. Those who refused, or even those who were perceived as not working hard enough, were k**led by Khmer Rouge thugs. As if that wasn’t bad enough, the result of forcing a bunch of people with no experience in farming to farm was, predictably, famine. Not even the peasants could fully keep up with the Khmer Rouge’s quotas, though; the yield they required was a threefold increase on the yield before their rise to power. In short, the Khmer Rouge forced an entire country’s population into s***ery.

As if the s***ery wasn’t bad enough there were some people who simply couldn't avoid being outright murdered. Royalty, the nobility, the rich, intellectuals- there was simply no hope for them. Of course, it wasn’t enough to massacre class enemies; their methods of determining if one was a class enemy were comical if they weren’t the cause of the death of hundreds of thousands. Those with glasses were massacred, as were writers, musicians, and filmmakers. Pol Pot, a hypocrite as well as a monster, was a fan of literature himself. By the end of the regime, almost no one left alive was literate. The Khmer Rouge is a chilling look at what happens when a class is truly almost wiped out.

As if all of this wasn’t enough… they were also r****t. They carried out genocide against Cambodia’s minorities, primarily the Thai, Chinese, and Vietnamese. This last one brought about their downfall; Vietnam, outraged over the massacres of their people, invaded Cambodia(sickeningly, China supported Pol Pot despite the massacre of their people). Most of Cambodia was liberated in less than a month, although holdouts of the Khmer Rouge still resist in the jungles of Cambodia to this day. Fortunately, they aren’t much more than an annoyance. The Khmer Rouge are the only ideology I can honestly say made literally no positive contributions. Their ideology was entirely built around hatred, insanity, and a desire for power. For this reason, Pol Pot’s C*******m is my least favorite ideology.

I have to wonder if Bernie Sanders is up on this.

But I am sure Bad Bob and Kyven and even Frostbite will disagree with me.
The f**g of Democratic Kampuchea or What is your l... (show quote)

Reply
May 7, 2018 01:49:21   #
woodguru
 
Nuclearian wrote:
My least favorite is the American Democratic Party, especially on the bench where judges lean well into their personal views rather than the CONSTITUTION, which is the law of the land. I find an unashamedly Liberal supreme court to be the worst, which is based on anti American HATRED, instead of the law as intended by the original founders.

That hard conservative ideology is bringing CONSTITUTIONAL LAW back into the law of the land, instead of a liberal, anti american judges "opinion" that leans toward antiamericanism, and destruction of America instead.
My least favorite is the American Democratic Party... (show quote)


And what is your position on GOP controlled states violating constitutional law to where they get slapped down by state and circuit courts, often conservative courts. Are you aware of any such violations or do you think these states are justified in violating the constitution?

Reply
May 7, 2018 02:31:39   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
woodguru wrote:
And what is your position on GOP controlled states violating constitutional law to where they get slapped down by state and circuit courts, often conservative courts. Are you aware of any such violations or do you think these states are justified in violating the constitution?
Give us examples of GOP controlled state legislatures or governors or both violating "constitutional law".

Show us a federal circuit court that is even close to being conservative.

Give us an example of a conservative court of any kind.

And, finally, what the hell do you know about constitutional law? Or, the constitution itself. So far you have never backed up your off the wall statements.

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2018 07:31:59   #
Big Kahuna
 
Yes the heroes on the left were big time murderers. Mao, Stalin, lenin, castro, che, chavez, pol pot, and the planned parent founder and baby murderer, Maggie Sanger (hillaries and women's rights hero). The left loves this immoral type of person.

Reply
May 7, 2018 07:45:12   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Manning345 wrote:
Pol Pot is a good start. I will add, in no special order:
Secular Humanism
Progressivism
Socialism
C*******m of all other kinds
Dictatorships
These ideologies are mainly driven by atheists that deny God.


You have to add national socialism and f*****m.

Reply
May 7, 2018 09:15:19   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
woodguru wrote:
My least favorite is hard conservatism, especially on the bench where judges lean well into their personal views rather than the law. I find an unashamedly conservative supreme court to be the worst, and the right sees any that don't v**e hard right to be liberal when the opposition may be based on sound law.

That hard conservative ideology is bringing too many religiously based concepts into law. A hard conservative judge will put their religious beliefs ahead of the constitution when they conflict, and will defend their right to do so.
My least favorite is hard conservatism, especially... (show quote)


Uh Woody, where do you think our laws originated from? What writings and what documents? Here is a video that might help you understand more than they now teach in school or even colleges if you want a better understanding: https://youtu.be/WofsDBaBMq4

Reply
May 7, 2018 09:46:35   #
Freedomcalls
 
Woodguru when you prove about GOP legislation state and government and our governors on the GOP side are controlling stuff like you said I will give you your answer.. cold in the rest of them were telling you,( to save our constitution and mainly did you say the left wing brain dead assholes lives

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.