Pulitzer-winning reporter David Cay Johnston: “The evidence suggests Trump is a t*****r”
May 2, 2018 09:57:44 #
byronglimish wrote:
What post hasn't proved you to be a s*******s scoundrel.. I would say t*****r..but as a muhammadist, you're a foreign enemy combatant..
Damn Ron. That's not very nice coming from someone who actually did v**e for a t*****r! What's that make you--a treasonous enabler?
May 2, 2018 09:59:19 #
Kevyn wrote:
Any of the Pumpkinfuhrers sycophants who read this will not respond to its factual content, because the information is beyond serious dispute. You will either get no response or nonsensical insults.
The only thing they know how to do anymore is throw insults. Any actual thinking escaped from their little brains eons ago...
May 2, 2018 10:04:24 #
lindajoy wrote:
Oh hogwash!!! What crap this is, and you really buy it??
Evidence suggests no such thing!! Trumps ACTION in staying true to his campaign promises and already having bettered jobs, to promote A thriving economy is not a t*****r! Now the man before him that occupied our Oval office certainly IS a t*****r..
Evidence suggests no such thing!! Trumps ACTION in staying true to his campaign promises and already having bettered jobs, to promote A thriving economy is not a t*****r! Now the man before him that occupied our Oval office certainly IS a t*****r..
How has he bettered jobs and where is the A thriving economy? Last quarters GDP was 2.3 and in the area that Obama was use to hitting plus satisfying the hopes and dreams of 35% of its citizens does not a true American make.
May 2, 2018 10:47:39 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
PeterS wrote:
Damn Ron. That's not very nice coming from someone who actually did v**e for a t*****r! What's that make you--a treasonous enabler?
So this pile if dung has convicted the President (in the prog minds) of treason... that's a laugh..
May 2, 2018 13:28:10 #
PeterS wrote:
The only thing they know how to do anymore is throw insults. Any actual thinking escaped from their little brains eons ago...
Read your first sentence then the second and ponder on that awhile.
May 2, 2018 13:43:26 #
cold iron wrote:
Lying t*****r should not be allowed on the site. Go back into your cave creep.
lying t*****rs against ignorant t*****rs
May 2, 2018 13:45:36 #
byronglimish wrote:
So this pile if dung has convicted the President (in the prog minds) of treason... that's a laugh..
No actually the evidence and trial part will come soon, simply looking at the evidence that is out there to see is not a conviction, contrary to the right that believes something and start chanting lock them up without the benefit of facts or a trial.
May 2, 2018 17:27:11 #
May 3, 2018 05:49:33 #
Read the replies, they are frightening, the words of sad, adolescents, this what political discourse has come to in America?
H**e, H**e and more h**e. I wish it wasn't true, but am afraid we are doomed.
H**e, H**e and more h**e. I wish it wasn't true, but am afraid we are doomed.
May 3, 2018 06:01:37 #
Kevyn wrote:
Any of the Pumpkinfuhrers sycophants who read this will not respond to its factual content, because the information is beyond serious dispute. You will either get no response or nonsensical insults.
Factual content? What facts? Facts have concomitant proof. This article is a character assassination without a single effing sentence of proof. Accusations with nothing but Liberal losers' whines as corroboration.
May 3, 2018 06:05:12 #
PeterS wrote:
Damn Ron. That's not very nice coming from someone who actually did v**e for a t*****r! What's that make you--a treasonous enabler?
A treasonous enabler would be a Hillary v**er. A treasonous enabler would be someone who supports amnesty for wetback criminals. A treasonous enabler is someone who repeatedly v**es for anti-American politicians. (Most, but not all, Democrats.) A "treasonous enabler would be........you.
May 3, 2018 06:06:26 #
woodguru wrote:
lying t*****rs against ignorant t*****rs
Then there are the Liberal looney tunes who seem to have both bases covered like a blanket.
May 3, 2018 06:16:43 #
mwdegutis wrote:
Read your first sentence then the second and ponder on that awhile.
No need. So show me where I insulted you.
May 3, 2018 06:21:42 #
PeterS wrote:
No need. So show me where I insulted you.
"Butt monkey for Trump." Kind of like a "chancre-sucking ass clown for Hillary." Now, show me where I insulted you.
May 3, 2018 06:30:03 #
PeterS wrote:
No need. So show me where I insulted you.
Of course you wouldn't understand you dimwit. It's only insulting when someone besides you does it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.