Breaking!!!!Mueller's questions for President have been leaked!!!...Here they are: (Page 3): Trump already answered the question of why he fired Comey. By Matt Apuzzo, Maggie Haberman...

Geo

pafret wrote:

You don't get it. No matter what answer Trump giv... (show quote)

Trump already answered the question of why he fired Comey.
By Matt Apuzzo, Maggie Haberman and Matthew Rosenberg
May 19, 2017
Leer en español
WASHINGTON — President Trump told Russian officials in the Oval Office this month that firing the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, had relieved “great pressure” on him, according to a document summarizing the meeting.
“I just fired the head of the F.B.I. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Mr. Trump said, according to the document, which was read to The New York Times by an American official. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
Mr. Trump added, “I’m not under investigation.”
The conversation, during a May 10 meeting — the day after he fired Mr. Comey — reinforces the notion that the president dismissed him primarily because of the bureau’s investigation into possible collusion between Mr. Trump’s campaign and Russian operatives. Mr. Trump said as much in one televised interview, but the White House has offered changing justifications for the firing.

pafret Loc: Northeast

Geo wrote:

Trump already answered the question of why he fire... (show quote)

Again, a document summarizing the meeting that had very specific quotes from Trump. Who provided the document? How was its provenance verified? Which Russian officials were there and have they provided corroboration of what was said at the meeting? Presumably, since they were there, a Russian attendee's version should illuminate these questions.

I will save you the trouble, I was there and Trump discussed grandkids and Judaism with the Russian Trade Delegation. He was attempting to negotiate a deal for American Matzo Ball manufacturers to ship product to Russia. The Russians were tough, for every Matzo Ball plus Kreplach we had to accept four Russian Blini's or three Pirogies.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Mueller threatens President with Grand Jury if he refuses to answer Mueller's questions......Is that right thing to do in the USA????...If this happens then we are no better then any c*******t country....

Gatsby

Mueller can stick his grand jury in his ear, no grand jury can indict a sitting president.

That power is reserved to the house of representatives, pesky outdated old Constitution just gets in the way of progress.

proud republican wrote:

Mueller threatens President with Grand Jury if he refuses to answer Mueller's questions......Is that right thing to do in the USA????...If this happens then we are no better then any c*******t country....

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Gatsby wrote:

Mueller can stick his grand jury in his ear, no grand jury can indict a sitting president.

That power is reserved to the house of representatives, pesky outdated old Constitution just gets in the way of progress.

Many legal scholars doubt Mueller can bring criminal charges against Trump, and more importantly, there is no legal precedent for an indictment of a president.. It will not happen and Mueller is just a pompous ass!!

There has never been a sitting President indicted.. .

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Kevyn wrote:

You do realize the questions were leaked by the Pumpkinfuhrers own legal team so he could feign outrage.

The questions were leaked to the NYT, WaPo, and CNN by Mueller and his team. And, within hours of the leaks, NYT hacks provided ALL THE ANSWERS. Anyone with a brain somewhere in their body, even in their ass, can see clearly that these questions and answers are a bill for articles of impeachment.

President Trump does not have to feign outrage. You l*****t A-holes have outraged him and all the Americans who put him in office.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Kevyn wrote:

You do realize the questions were leaked by the Pumpkinfuhrers own legal team so he could feign outrage.

I've heard the possibility raised.

Kevyn

lindajoy wrote:

Who says so????

What purpose would it serve for Muellers people to leak the list. It is pretty obvious it came from the White House. http://www.newsweek.com/trump-leak-mueller-questions-experts-906857

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Kevyn wrote:

If Trump isn’t dirty and dosn’t lie he has nothing to worry about, the fact that he is whining like a little girl ought to tell you something.

It tells me you're naive.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

lindajoy wrote:

Many legal scholars doubt Mueller can bring criminal charges against Trump, and more importantly, there is no legal precedent for an indictment of a president.. It will not happen and Mueller is just a pompous ass!!

There has never been a sitting President indicted.. .

Judicial review committees under both republican and democrat admins agree that a sitting president cannot be indicted and prosecuted for any crime, only after successful impeachment can he be charged with any crime, and as with all such charges, there must be probable cause to do so. Mueller is trying to concoct a crime without probable cause. His witch hunt is entirely unconstitutional and what Mueller is doing, probably without even knowing it, is destroying our justice system. Hitler's Gestapo employed the same sort of tactics to remove his political opposition.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Kevyn wrote:

What purpose would it serve for Muellers people to leak the list. It is pretty obvious it came from the White House. http://www.newsweek.com/trump-leak-mueller-questions-experts-906857

Please tell us you are not that stupid.

Never mind.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Blade_Runner wrote:

Judicial review committees under both republican a... (show quote)

Mueller is not ignorant of repercussion from his own tactics, he's not new at this game..Mueller, like most Progs, would rather see us fail as a Republic,than let our President Donald J Trump remain in office.. Have you ever broadened your Investigation of Mueller's past..if a person will actually look into most everything that Mueller has been part of..he's just like Hillary ..too many sketchy details..People say that Obama served this Nation..but Obama was serving this Nation to others..so I liken Mueller in that vein...a big phony..with obvious repercussions.. question, how come Hillary is not being called in by Mueller's team for questions about the Dossier..or Donna Brazile..

Holdenbeach4u Loc: Holden Beach , NC

Muelier is all evil and the deep swamp wants Trump out the way because the i***ts wants the NWO ! The UN and other foreigners are already in the USA . The lists
of previous people should be in jail already like ; Obama , Clinton’s , Holders , Lynch and a lot more too !

Old Dog

At 83 I thought I have seen it all but in today's age of turmoil I really rely on Steve's posts
to rejuvinate my mind and explore what has not been said or investigated beyond the normal everyday BS.

That being said I gladly open the door for the Lib-turds to assassinate me.

bestpal38 Loc: Cedar City, Utah

Kevyn wrote:

I am used to running across ignorance on OPP, I chalk it up to lack of intellect and educational opportunities. There is also plenty of h**e, of women, gays, foreigners people of color and various religions. The h**e is a result of people blaming their personal failures in life on others. The real beauties here are the tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists and you and Scintillating must be battling for the crown of the king of the crackpots.

You're used to ignorance here, because it's mostly in your posts. Liberals h**e h**ers, makes sense to me.