Detailed evidence that Hillary and DNC broke federal campaign-finance law: Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice one more time? It does not appear so. Last week’s federal...

rumitoid

Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice one more time? It does not appear so.

Last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 p**********l e******n. The "detailed evidence" is from Federal E******n Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited t***sfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/

donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa

great, But when is any one going to the slammer for it?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

rumitoid wrote:

Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice one more time? It does not appear so.

Last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 p**********l e******n. The "detailed evidence" is from Federal E******n Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited t***sfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/

Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice... (show quote)

She will face justice. It's only a matter of time...unless she croaks first, which could happen.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

donald41 wrote:

great, But when is any one going to the slammer for it?

She could be absolved in a court of law.

donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa

BigMike wrote:

She could be absolved in a court of law.

God, I hope not. They are stalling, hoping she will die 1st,

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

donald41 wrote:

God, I hope not. They are stalling, hoping she will die 1st,

They think there's still a chance this will go away. That's because they don't know Who is pulling their cover.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

rumitoid wrote:

Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice one more time? It does not appear so.

Last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 p**********l e******n. The "detailed evidence" is from Federal E******n Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited t***sfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/

Can the Teflon Lady do it again and escape justice... (show quote)

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Bad Bob wrote:

She's a common criminal, Bob. Bill tried to talk her out of all this bulls**t and she called him an old fool or some such.

Overreaching doesn't pay and that's what she did.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

BigMike wrote:

She's a common criminal, Bob. Bill tried to talk her out of all this bulls**t and she called him an old fool or some such.

Overreaching doesn't pay and that's what she did.

We will see.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Bad Bob wrote:

We will see.

Yes. We will. Which brings me back to something I said as soon as Trump announced.

The hag's only hope is a Not Guilty in a court of law. If she get's one I can live with that but there are a few things she definitely should have been charged with and until she is she'll be under their curse. Mark my words.

rumitoid

BigMike wrote:

Yes. We will. Which brings me back to something I said as soon as Trump announced.

The hag's only hope is a Not Guilty in a court of law. If she get's one I can live with that but there are a few things she definitely should have been charged with and until she is she'll be under their curse. Mark my words.

Hillary is definitely one of those in politics that make you wonder why you keep trust in America's system. Her husband used to make my shin-crawl every time I saw him. That has happened to me twice before, both times it turned out those men were highly unsavory: one was domestic violence and the other, an archbishop, was a child molester. The sight of all three made me very uncomfortable. I had no justifiable, or verifiable, reasons to believe they were not good men, just my gut. I have had correct feelings about the character of others, yet these three were highly pronounced. Unquestionable indicators they were not right. Just a sense about Hillary, nothing definite. But we lost anyway. Trump is our worst case scenario. If America is still standing in three years, it will only be by direct intervention from God.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

BigMike wrote:

She will face justice. It's only a matter of time...unless she croaks first, which could happen.

What happens if, as I strongly suspect, that the Big Kahuna, the biggest of them all, Barack H. Obama is at the heart of it all?

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

crazylibertarian wrote:

What happens if, as I strongly suspect, that the Big Kahuna, the biggest of them all, Barack H. Obama is at the heart of it all?

What happens if, as I strongly suspect, that the Big Kahuna, the biggest of them all, Donald Trump is a proven p*******e?

woodguru

That would have been big news if she had won, I'm sure she'd have already been impeached. Trump is president, he is more important, impeach on...

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

crazylibertarian wrote:

What happens if, as I strongly suspect, that the Big Kahuna, the biggest of them all, Barack H. Obama is at the heart of it all?

Of course he is...and he ain't gonna get away with this.