rumitoid

Laura Ingram attacked a Parkland survivor over not getting into college. What the hell is that petty nonsense? Why? Absurd! Did you ever ask yourself why this base assault on a dramatized teen? The young men she attacked fought back, calling for sponsors to drop her dumbass, and they did. Then Ingram asserts his response to her attack is the Left looking to suppress free speech. Huh? What? How? This is the typical vacuous attack by the Right. Absurd and contradictory claims of bias. Responding to vocal and public attacks is not an attempt to limit or suppress Free Speech. Ingram does the GOP shuffle: accuse the other of their own f**grant misconduct. She is not somehow exempt from rebuttal after her unwarranted attack under the 1st Amendment. Answering a comment is not an attempt to suppress free speech; equal rights. But the dumb base, dumbed down as far down as Fox News can make it, cannot differentiate. And, well, they really do not care about facts or t***h.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

You calling us dumb????Your little hero got called out for what he is which is a jerk, and what does he do???He went sniveling around like a little b***h that he is...He thought he was gonna brake Laura down???..The opposite happened actually..More people are listening and watching Laura Ingrahm show..He actually did her and us a favor!!!....Thank you little boy...

rumitoid

PR, I always treat you with respect, even when you posts absurdities like this.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Thank you Rumi,but its the t***h!!!

EconomistDon

You got it right, Rumi, and you don't even realize it. You said "Did you ever ask yourself why this base assault on a dramatized teen?" Yes, you said DRAMATIZED. That is exactly what happened. These teens were coached and choreographed by a l*****t gun control group "Everytown for Gun Safety", which is heavily funded by Michael Bloomberg. The DRAMA was carefully planned and executed by "Everytown". These teens were convenient patsies for the gun control fruitrcakes to further their agenda. These kids went through enough; they didn't need a bunch of "Everytown" radicals swooping in to shove them in front of cameras to spout the liberal agenda. Liberals everywhere should be ashamed at how "Everytown" abused these grief-stricken kids.

rumitoid

Perhaps. "These teens were coached and choreographed by a l*****t gun control group "Everytown for Gun Safety", which is heavily funded by Michael Bloomberg. The DRAMA was carefully planned and executed by "Everytown". These teens were convenient patsies for the gun control fruitrcakes to further their agenda." And Sandyhook and Columbine and Las Vegas were all a staged event by the Left to take away all guns. No one died in these events. A figment of the Left's imagination, despite all the funerals and lost people, and bodies in the morgue. .

archie bunker Loc: Texas

She said he was whining for crying out loud! You call that an attack? Good grief!!!!

Steve700

These libs never get it; not even after it's been pointed out to them. They will still just continue on with their nonsense because to them, facts don't matter when the facts don't fit their programming. (Just like a computer won't recognize what it is not programmed to deal with)

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

EconomistDon

Rumi, Rumi, Rumi, we aren't talking about the shooting; we are talking about the stupidity that followed. You are getting events mixed up in your mind. The shootings all occurred and were tragic; none of that was "staged". How can you say such stupid s**t? We are talking about the left's knee-jerk reaction to blame guns and demand an end to the second amendment every time. But, Rumi, you musty keep one simple fact in mind and go from there. GUNS DON'T K**L PEOPLE, PEOPLE K**L PEOPLE!!!! You can change gun laws all you want, or take all the guns that you can. But it won't stop i***ts from k*****g people. If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns, and keep on k*****g people. If you miraculously manage to confiscate all guns, the i***ts will k**l with bombs which can be home-made if not purchased. So let's stop s**tting our pants about guns and address the REAL problem -- making kids and everyone safe from i***ts who will always find a way to k**l. We lose sight of that important issue when we focus all of our attention on the gun confiscation crap. We need to talk about why there was an armed security guard at Parkland, who cowered outside during the shooting. He probably could have run to any point in the school within one minute and confronted the shooter. But the shooting went on for seven long minutes while the security guard cowered outside. And why not give guns and gun training to several teachers who are willing to take on the responsibility? Let's talk about how we deal with i***ts; school officials, local police, and the FBI were all warned about the shooter at Parkland, yet nobody did anything about it. Why????? Shut up about guns and talk about how to deal with i***ts.

rumitoid

She roasted him for not getting into the colleges he applied for. How base and cheap is that and totally off-point.

rumitoid

I have never advocated for gun confiscation and believe that is wrong. I have, and will continue to, pressed for sensible and responsible gun-control. It is sheer madness not to have stricter and enforceable regulations in place. Violence in our nation is out of control. GUNS K**L PEOPLE. Tell the family and loved ones of all those who died to gun violence they weren't shot and k**led. It was just a person, not a bullet. Insane!

The Right, especially Infowars, are the ones who said all these mass shootings were staged, not me: A Left-wing conspiracy to take away all guns (with Black helicopters in the middle of the night).

"Shut up about guns and talk about how to deal with i***ts." Have stricter and universal gun-control is how to deal with these violent i***ts. Stopping just one is worth it. There is no fail-safe method to stop all violence, but to use that as an excuse not to stop some is absurd and egregious.

EconomistDon

OK, so you are not as dumb as you look. BUT, the fact remains that "guns don't k**l people, people k**l people". If guns k**led people, nobody would get out of gun shows alive. So let's focus on people who k**l people and how to stop them. You will NEVER take their guns out of their hands, no matter what you do with gun control.

jarlaxle Loc: Locked in Robert L Peter's basement... HELP

Amen! Rumis most likely an inbred rhetorical anomoly that prevokes the next shooting with the bass akwards crap itheshe posts

rumitoid

I reiterate, I do not want to "take their guns out of their hands." The 2nd Amendment is sacrosanct to our Republic. This what I would like to see and I am open to adjustments.

-Mandatory safety classes on the proper use and storage of weapons, a 2 hour course run by the local police department with an augmented compensation by the Federal government. Over 7,000 children are hospitalized or k**led due to gun violence every year, according to a new study published in the medical journal Pediatrics. An additional 3,000 children die from gun injuries before making it to the hospital, bringing the total number of injured or k**led adolescents to 10,000 each year. (Don't believe me, google it.)
Laws enacted to punish those who do not follow Safety guidelines.

-Universal background checks by the States going to a National database that will f**g questionable permits by each state, and not a federal repository. This needs to be sufficiently funded by each state and supplemented by the Federal government to ensure these checks are thorough. Those responsible for these checks will be held accountable if not reasonably thorough. This includes a mandatory two week waiting period to get a license.

-All guns to require licensing and background checks: no gun show or hand-me-down loopholes.

-Mandatory training in marksmanship every four years, again by local authorities.

-No weapon permits to those on the no fly list, criminal records, restraint orders, serious mental disturbance, or members of groups deemed a threat to domestic tranquility.

The possibility for abuse by the Federal government is huge in my suggestions. For those who believe we have a 2nd Amendment to protect us from abuse or attack by the Federal Government, my suggestions are probably treasonous, in a way. Case in point: The Whiskey R*******n of 1791. (The so-called "whiskey tax" was the first tax imposed on a domestic product by the newly formed federal government. It became law in 1791, and was intended to generate revenue for the war debt incurred during the Revolutionary War. The tax applied to all distilled spirits, but American whiskey was by far the country's most popular distilled beverage in the 18th century, so the excise became widely known as a "whiskey tax". Farmers of the western frontier were accustomed to distilling their surplus rye, barley, wheat, corn, or fermented grain mixtures into whiskey. These farmers resisted the tax. In these regions, whiskey often served as a medium of exchange. Many of the resisters were war veterans who believed that they were fighting for the principles of the American Revolution, in particular against taxation without local representation, while the federal government maintained that the taxes were the legal expression of Congressional taxation powers.

Throughout Western Pennsylvania counties, protesters used violence and intimidation to prevent federal officials from collecting the tax. Resistance came to a climax in July 1794, when a U.S. marshal arrived in western Pennsylvania to serve writs to distillers who had not paid the excise. The alarm was raised, and more than 500 armed men attacked the fortified home of tax inspector General John Neville. Washington responded by sending peace commissioners to western Pennsylvania to negotiate with the rebels, while at the same time calling on governors to send a m*****a force to enforce the tax. Washington himself rode at the head of an army to suppress the insurgency, with 13,000 m*****amen provided by the governors of Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The rebels all went home before the arrival of the army, and there was no confrontation. About 20 men were arrested, but all were later acquitted or pardoned. Most distillers in nearby Kentucky were found to be all but impossible to tax—in the next six years, over 175 distillers from Kentucky were convicted of violating the tax law.[3] Numerous examples of resistance are recorded in court documents and newspaper accounts.[4]

The Whiskey R*******n demonstrated that the new national government had the will and ability to suppress violent resistance to its laws, though the whiskey excise remained difficult to collect. The events contributed to the formation of political parties in the United States, a process already underway. The whiskey tax was repealed in the early 1800s during the Jefferson administration.)