Steve700

Not one Liberal Democrat has criticised Trump for his retaliation on Assod. Not a single negative peep out of even the most crazy of the Trump H**ers like Maxine Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, or Feinstein. Even the constantly exaggerating, Trump hating and slandering news media seem to have no problem on this one. That's the 1st indicator that there is something wrong here. Beyond that, it's the United Nations that should be dealing with that, not the United States. Secondly, Assod k**ls terrorists and protects the Christians. The exact reason Obama wanted him out in the 1st place. And what right did Obama have any way, to be telling the leader of a sovereign nation that he had to go ??? (Saddam Hussein and more of Marimar Qaddafi also k**led terrorists and protected the Christians) a sure indicator that there is something nefarious in our foreign policy and that there has been for some time. Qaddafi said "If you k**l me, Libya will descend into chaos with Islamist war lords controlling various regions of my country" and that's exactly what happened there and in Iraq thanks to Obama (obviously deliberate) foreigh polocy to take down moderate Mideast governments while supporting and financing jahadists and calling moderates, like, for instance, in Irac by ignoring the advice of both military and civilian advisors, with his resulting actions giving our long fought for victory away to the hard-core Muslim h**ers. Now it seems that somebody does not want Putin and Assod to be successful in producing peace --- as also seems to be the case, as I have just shown, by what I pointed out about Iraq and Libya, as well as for the Mideast in general. And of course, Obama was thrilled with the Islamization that newly elected Morrissey was bringing about in Egypt, and went crazy complaining when the Egyptian army took him out for trying to make himself in Islamic dictator. Yet even now, I am sorry to say, it seems that the deep state shadow government is still running the show. (& they are a g*******t entity that has an investment in chaos because they follow the UN's agenda, which includes a 90% of reduction of the world's population) . Also, If you want to look into it, I think Chaney's "Project For A New American Century" makes a lot of sense of all this.

Also, it is very apparent that Assod is winning with only a few remaining pockets of rebels remaining (that is, Islamist jihadist) between him and complete victory) What does he have to gain by using chemical weapons and turning the whole world against him. What Does he have to gain ??? I don't believe he did it the 1st time when America retaliated and certainly he must know a coming reprisal would have to be worse on the 2nd time around. Beyond that, presuming that these so-called rebels are not moderate but Islamist jihadist wanting to see a Islamist government in Syria, personally, my criticism of using chemical weapons against these ISIS type of mentality barbarians, is limited. The collateral damage is unfortunate but an unavoidable consequence of war.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

-----------------
You have posted some excellent observations. Assad is a leader that is well liked by the people of Syria, and have their overwhelming support. You're right, the Christian and Alawite population would suffer greatly if Assad were deposed, just like the other Arab countries where their leader was replaced by radical Islamists. Too bad more people have not thought this through, and believe the controlled and f**e MSM.

out of the woods Loc: to hell and gone New York State

That the liberals were all for it, was to my mind a red f**g also. That they targeted children and other helpless civilians, another. It just doesn't make sense for Assad to make a move like this and I feel somehow that Trumps hand was forced. The powers that be have placed him in an all or nothing situation, no turning back, without suffering a crippling barrage of media attacks. I just have no faith in what we are being told. The only ones to benefit from a war would be the g*******ts, as they will decend upon the ensuing chaos to seize more control.

Big dog

Agreed

Lonewolf

Good post have to agree 100%




quote=Steve700]Not one Liberal Democrat has criticised Trump for his retaliation on Assod. Not a single negative peep out of even the most crazy of the Trump H**ers like Maxine Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, or Feinstein. Even the constantly exaggerating, Trump hating and slandering news media seem to have no problem on this one. That's the 1st indicator that there is something wrong here. Beyond that, it's the United Nations that should be dealing with that, not the United States. Secondly, Assod k**ls terrorists and protects the Christians. The exact reason Obama wanted him out in the 1st place. And what right did Obama have any way, to be telling the leader of a sovereign nation that he had to go ??? (Saddam Hussein and more of Marimar Qaddafi also k**led terrorists and protected the Christians) a sure indicator that there is something nefarious in our foreign policy and that there has been for some time. Qaddafi said "If you k**l me, Libya will descend into chaos with Islamist war lords controlling various regions of my country" and that's exactly what happened there and in Iraq thanks to Obama (obviously deliberate) foreigh polocy to take down moderate Mideast governments while supporting and financing jahadists and calling moderates, like, for instance, in Irac by ignoring the advice of both military and civilian advisors, with his resulting actions giving our long fought for victory away to the hard-core Muslim h**ers. Now it seems that somebody does not want Putin and Assod to be successful in producing peace --- as also seems to be the case, as I have just shown, by what I pointed out about Iraq and Libya, as well as for the Mideast in general. And of course, Obama was thrilled with the Islamization that newly elected Morrissey was bringing about in Egypt, and went crazy complaining when the Egyptian army took him out for trying to make himself in Islamic dictator. Yet even now, I am sorry to say, it seems that the deep state shadow government is still running the show. (& they are a g*******t entity that has an investment in chaos because they follow the UN's agenda, which includes a 90% of reduction of the world's population) . Also, If you want to look into it, I think Chaney's "Project For A New American Century" makes a lot of sense of all this.

Also, it is very apparent that Assod is winning with only a few remaining pockets of rebels remaining (that is, Islamist jihadist) between him and complete victory) What does he have to gain by using chemical weapons and turning the whole world against him. What Does he have to gain ??? I don't believe he did it the 1st time when America retaliated and certainly he must know a coming reprisal would have to be worse on the 2nd time around. Beyond that, presuming that these so-called rebels are not moderate but Islamist jihadist wanting to see a Islamist government in Syria, personally, my criticism of using chemical weapons against these ISIS type of mentality barbarians, is limited. The collateral damage is unfortunate but an unavoidable consequence of war.[/quote]

Radiance3

=================
Very good analysis. Without Assad, who will take over? Under Assad, there were more Christians living there, until ISIS k**led them. There will be power struggles, and ISIS could take over. It will get worst.

Just like what Obama did to Gadaffi of Libya. Gadaffi was moderate with the West. He had the best economy for his people. After he was taken, chaos, violence, and poverty took over. We ended up our Ambassador Stevens and 3 others k**led.

Just like Iraq. There were more Christians in Iraq when Saddam was in power. Now they are gone, hiding up in the mountains only to die there.

We have been spending hundreds of billions of dollars, and lives of our men and women only to reap more violence and poverty among those people.

Results. Steering all these Jehadists, there were exodus of tens of millions of Muslims went to the West in Europe, US, Canada, and Australia. Is this what you want America? Now, Europe is almost taken, by jihad with frequent terrorism, rape, and assaults of these barbarians.

Likewise in America it is the same. We spend billions of dollars, at the cost of the lives of our own people. And Obama claimed, Islam is a religion of peace.

UN is the number one proponent of these wars. Lock and load? I don't like that statement by Nikki Haley. That means more wars there?

US must not intervene with the Middle East. It just made them worst, then they blame the US. We probably could have better relationship with Russia, if we don't
get involved with Assad.

We have to take care of our own priorities. Our national debts, border walls, and old infrastructures must be taken cared of first.