We argue a lot in this country about v****g, v****g rights, and the entire v****g process. So what do you think the process should entail?
JFlorio wrote:
We argue a lot in this country about v****g, v****g rights, and the entire v****g process. So what do you think the process should entail?
O.K. I’ll go first.
1). No early v****g except for 70 and older, disabled, and military.
2). Paper b****ts. (English only)
3). Photo I. D., such as drivers license. No exceptions.
4). E******n Day, to be declared a national holiday. No excuses to not be able to get off work and v**e.
JFlorio wrote:
We argue a lot in this country about v****g, v****g rights, and the entire v****g process. So what do you think the process should entail?
It is quite simple really. In order to v**e, you must first be a US Citizen. Second, you should be required to prove you are a US Citizen. Third, the integrity of the v****g process must be able to be audited and verified. The whole concept of electronic v****g without the ability to establish an audit trail leaves the system open to tampering, hacking, and distrust in the system. Fourth, and in relation to point #3, the v**er's picture should be taken, and or a fingerprint matched to the v****g entry to insure that any attempt to cast an illegal v**e could easily be prosecuted.
Now let's see the howl of protests from the left claiming that there is no problem with illegal v****g, and that all these suggestions are simply a means to disenfranchise the left, and minority v**ers.
Oh, and BTW, you can get a clear idea how many feel on this subject by searching OPP for "Illegal V****g", and this is the result you will get.
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/search-topic-list?q=illegal+v****g§num=0&username=
Damn. You nailed it. I actually didn’t say proof of citizenship because I was thinking in the obvious and past. Times have changed. Good catch.
ACP45 wrote:
It is quite simple really. In order to v**e, you must first be a US Citizen. Second, you should be required to prove you are a US Citizen. Third, the integrity of the v****g process must be able to be audited and verified. The whole concept of electronic v****g without the ability to establish an audit trail leaves the system open to tampering, hacking, and distrust in the system. Fourth, and in relation to point #3, the v**er's picture should be taken, and or a fingerprint matched to the v****g entry to insure that any attempt to cast an illegal v**e could easily be prosecuted.
Now let's see the howl of protests from the left claiming that there is no problem with illegal v****g, and that all these suggestions are simply a means to disenfranchise the left, and minority v**ers.
Oh, and BTW, you can get a clear idea how many feel on this subject by searching OPP for "Illegal V****g", and this is the result you will get.
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/search-topic-list?q=illegal+v****g§num=0&username=It is quite simple really. In order to v**e, you m... (
show quote)
4430
Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
JFlorio wrote:
O.K. I’ll go first.
1). No early v****g except for 70 and older, disabled, and military.
2). Paper b****ts. (English only)
3). Photo I. D., such as drivers license. No exceptions.
4). E******n Day, to be declared a national holiday. No excuses to not be able to get off work and v**e.
I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give i******s drivers licenses !
4430 wrote:
I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give i******s drivers licenses !
Yep and notice who were the blue states. In Illinois basically the whole state was red except 3 or 4 counties going blue. Of course one of those counties was cook, which contains Chicago the home of v***r f***d and patronage. Screwed the whole state, as usual. Ugh so s**k of it. I never could understand any LEGAL rationale behind the whole no ID required to v**e. Serves no purpose that I can see other than to create ease of fraud.
I agree. would have ot be a certain designation on the license specifying that you are a citizen.
4430 wrote:
I like all except #3 Cailf and IL are two states that I of that give i******s drivers licenses !
4430
Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
JFlorio wrote:
I agree. would have ot be a certain designation on the license specifying that you are a citizen.
However the Libs would not stand for that !
Wonder what their excuse would be this time? I know, "colored" ink is r****t.
4430 wrote:
However the Libs would not stand for that !
JFlorio wrote:
We argue a lot in this country about v****g, v****g rights, and the entire v****g process. So what do you think the process should entail?
Agree totally with your listing below.
Question. How can reasonable people criticize a system which should first and foremost verify the validity of the v**er?
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
Agree totally with your listing below.
Question. How can reasonable people criticize a system which should first and foremost verify the validity of the v**er?
Cuz some people like to make it easy to c***t
debeda wrote:
Cuz some people like to make it easy to c***t
Notice that no lefties have made comments. Strange, isn't it?
mwdegutis wrote:
Notice that no lefties have made comments. Strange, isn't it?
No. Quite expected, I'd say.
I can't imagine why the (R) presidents, Reagan, or the Bushes didn't have the moxie to begin this national overhaul. It has been sorely needed since Eisenhower.
Maybe they were emasculated or scared of the Dems.
God bless you Mr. Trump and I wish you the most success in all you are attempting.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.