Islam is like a p******c, a worldwide contagious disease. But how to treat it here, with 1st Amnedment rights?
Mar 18, 2018 19:32:57 #
We wrongly rounded up Japanese-Americans during WWII, an egregious affront to our Constitution. The same for Islam is out of the question.
Mar 19, 2018 01:04:01 #
I disagree...
The answer to the Islamic problem, and it is a problem long recognized, can be understood by answering two very simple questions, can a Democratic government v**e itself out of existence, and then, what would be the result of that.
In order for a democratic nation to survive as a democratic nation, there are some issues that must remain beyond the power of the people to change. The advantage of OUR Republic is that some of those changes are constitutionally beyond the ability of the people to affect... or, at least, to easily affect.
The stated goal of Islam is to make the entire world part of a universal caliph**e, subject to the Laws of Allah as defined by the religious and political leaders of the religious faith and the political government. In Islam, those two entities are the same thing. The First Amendment does not protect s******n. The most fundamental tenets of Islam are the substance of s******n in a constitutional republic. There is no reason Islam need be protected by the First Amendment because Islam is not a religion in the sense recognized by that amendment. Islam is a force designed for and dedicated to the destruction of this Republic.
Wearing the hair shirt of the Japanese, Italian and German internments and deportations of WWII may salve the sore sensibilities of the Left but pretending to have any obligation to make up for what are today deemed errors of the past, is absurd. Our progenitors did what they understood was best for us and we are under the same obligation to our progeny, to pass on a nation, intact and functional when our presence is no longer felt.
The Islamic threat must be removed from our shores. We need not be mean spirited or malicious in the process but we must understand what is the outcome of inaction.
The answer to the Islamic problem, and it is a problem long recognized, can be understood by answering two very simple questions, can a Democratic government v**e itself out of existence, and then, what would be the result of that.
In order for a democratic nation to survive as a democratic nation, there are some issues that must remain beyond the power of the people to change. The advantage of OUR Republic is that some of those changes are constitutionally beyond the ability of the people to affect... or, at least, to easily affect.
The stated goal of Islam is to make the entire world part of a universal caliph**e, subject to the Laws of Allah as defined by the religious and political leaders of the religious faith and the political government. In Islam, those two entities are the same thing. The First Amendment does not protect s******n. The most fundamental tenets of Islam are the substance of s******n in a constitutional republic. There is no reason Islam need be protected by the First Amendment because Islam is not a religion in the sense recognized by that amendment. Islam is a force designed for and dedicated to the destruction of this Republic.
Wearing the hair shirt of the Japanese, Italian and German internments and deportations of WWII may salve the sore sensibilities of the Left but pretending to have any obligation to make up for what are today deemed errors of the past, is absurd. Our progenitors did what they understood was best for us and we are under the same obligation to our progeny, to pass on a nation, intact and functional when our presence is no longer felt.
The Islamic threat must be removed from our shores. We need not be mean spirited or malicious in the process but we must understand what is the outcome of inaction.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.