Special e******n in Pennsylvania: (Page 2): Looks like the Democrat will probably win the special e******n in Pa. by running against his own party. He’s pro gun, pro coal, pro tariff...

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Looks like the Democrat will probably win the special e******n in Pa. by running against his own party. He’s pro gun, pro coal, pro tariff, and anti Pelosi.
Also democrats are fired up. Is this a bell weather of the mid terms? Maybe. Saccone was down by 6 or more percent before Trumps visit. Mid terms traditionally are bad for the party in power. My prediction, Democrats pick up 18 in House and lose 4 in Senate.

PeterS

JFlorio wrote:

Our politics can't get much stupider. Millions pou... (show quote)

Good, then you cons won't mind when you lose...

PeterS

JFlorio wrote:

This Democrat candidate sounds more like a Republican than the Republican.

Oh, if he was a republican you would call him a RINO.....

Alicia Loc: NYC

JW wrote:

How can you say that with a straight face? Trump spent 10% of Shrillary's e******n effort budget. Politicians love to spend money but the big spenders are the Democrats. It's one of the reasons Dem. led states are all in financial trouble.

****************
You neglect to note that 45 has been in business for a year. Evidently the results and choices of this administration are not pleasing any longer to those who might have v**ed for 45.

free believer

YES, like poor California with ONLY $6 billion in surplus.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

JFlorio wrote:

Looks like the Democrat will probably win the special e******n in Pa. by running against his own party. He’s pro gun, pro coal, pro tariff, and anti Pelosi.
Also democrats are fired up. Is this a bell weather of the mid terms? Maybe. Saccone was down by 6 or more percent before Trumps visit. Mid terms traditionally are bad for the party in power. My prediction, Democrats pick up 18 in House and lose 4 in Senate.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/d7fb51a2-d5dd-366f-9c2d-3c726c9e9c1b/ss_trump-allies-are-twisting.html

JW

Alicia wrote:

****************
You neglect to note that 45 has been in business for a year. Evidently the results and choices of this administration are not pleasing any longer to those who might have v**ed for 45.

According to the polls, Trump's retention of v**ers is around 85%. Not bad for a guy the media has constantly vilified.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Get a clue troll.
https://www.ocregister.com/2017/09/27/will-california-ever-pay-off-its-massive-debt/

free believer wrote:

YES, like poor California with ONLY $6 billion in surplus.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

JW wrote:

According to the polls, Trump's retention of v**ers is around 85%. Not bad for a guy the media has constantly vilified.

Guess they have nuttin to worry bout.

kemmer

proud republican wrote:

You are right,Jim..Mr. Saccone doesnt look like he is enthusiastic enough for this position!!!.....I dont think he stands a chance in my opinion.....

Privately and earlier, L'Orange said he didn't like Saccone anyway. But in a district that Trump took by 20 points, and Conor Lamb won, here comes the Blue Tsunami nationwide in the midterms.

kemmer

JW wrote:

How can you say that with a straight face? Trump spent 10% of Shrillary's e******n effort budget. Politicians love to spend money but the big spenders are the Democrats. It's one of the reasons Dem. led states are all in financial trouble.

The Republicans spent over $10 million on Saccone who most savvy people thought would lose anyway because he was just a mindless Trumpbot.
Trump's "campaign speech" for Saccone was nothing more than a Trump self-congratulatory mess which convinced no one to v**e for Saccone.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

The t***h. Saccone was a poor candidate who was down 6 to 10 points to Lamb before Trump showed up. Did Trump's speech move the needle? Don't know. One could certainly argue this. In all honesty I hope Lamb pulls it out. I want to see how this man v**es. He's pro gun, pro life, pro tariff, and anti Pelosi. Conservatives win either way if this man v**es his values as he espouses. He also puts the Democrats, now ruled by the insane left in one hell of a conundrum. If more Democrats sounded and v**ed like Lamb I could v**e for them. However; if he really v**es against the Schumer, Pelosi agenda he'll be nothing but a whipping boy for the Democrats.

Radiance3

proud republican wrote:

You are right,Jim..Mr. Saccone doesnt look like he is enthusiastic enough for this position!!!.....I dont think he stands a chance in my opinion.....

==================
Republicans should have chosen a more aggressive or assertive candidate. Someone younger with much potential. GOP asked for money to support Saconne. I sent money, cause I want Republican to win, and now that went down to the drain. Perhaps wrong candidate. It was close e******n. Perhaps the democrats c***ted again as their SOP all the time.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Radiance3 wrote:

==================
Republicans should have chosen a more aggressive or assertive candidate. Someone younger with much potential. GOP asked for money to support Saconne. I sent money, cause I want Republican to win, and now that went down to the drain. Perhaps wrong candidate. It was close e******n. Perhaps the democrats c***ted again as their SOP all the time.

Perhaps ya got your butt beat again.

Radiance3

Kevyn wrote:

I guess the fact that it is meaningless is why the Pumpkinfuhrer flew in to campaign and the Republicans put ten million into the race. That comes to almost $300 of corporate money per v**er.

====================
Very small difference. The demoncrats c***ted again. That is what they do to win!