One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sounds Like All is Not Well in Mudville With the Dems
Mar 10, 2018 02:31:22   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
I don't think they want to get c***ted this time around.

"Democratic officials are considering a new proposal to effectively eliminate all superdelegates, a move that would go beyond recommendations put forward late last year by the commission tasked with making the party's p**********l nominating process more fair..."

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/democrats-are-weighing-a-proposal-to-eliminate?utm_term=.mlBOGWv8e#.rfY9o3Agn

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 02:45:11   #
PeterS
 
BigMike wrote:
I don't think they want to get c***ted this time around.

"Democratic officials are considering a new proposal to effectively eliminate all superdelegates, a move that would go beyond recommendations put forward late last year by the commission tasked with making the party's p**********l nominating process more fair..."

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/democrats-are-weighing-a-proposal-to-eliminate?utm_term=.mlBOGWv8e#.rfY9o3Agn
I don't think they want to get I c***ted /I this... (show quote)

I guess I missed something--where was the democratic discourse?

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 02:51:38   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
PeterS wrote:
I guess I missed something--where was the democratic discourse?


What do you mean? The article was about the Dems tossing around the idea of getting rid of superdelegates.

Do you think that's a good idea?

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2018 05:29:11   #
phenry
 
BigMike wrote:
What do you mean? The article was about the Dems tossing around the idea of getting rid of superdelegates.

Do you think that's a good idea?


Give him a minute he has to check with the troll supervisor for the answer.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 08:34:45   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
BigMike wrote:
I don't think they want to get c***ted this time around.

"Democratic officials are considering a new proposal to effectively eliminate all superdelegates, a move that would go beyond recommendations put forward late last year by the commission tasked with making the party's p**********l nominating process more fair..."

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/democrats-are-weighing-a-proposal-to-eliminate?utm_term=.mlBOGWv8e#.rfY9o3Agn
I don't think they want to get I c***ted /I this... (show quote)


It seems the DNC has not learned that retaining super-delegates who do their bidding is not consistent with the will of the people. Bernie Sanders won the New England Primaries but Hillary stole them via Super-delegates. The v**ers responded by abandoning the DNC and v****g for other parties.

The possibilities put forth included depriving senior politicians of the right to primary v**e and this was greeted with horror. Ostensibly because it would disenfranchise the president and congress people who might become super-delegates. But primarily because the DNC is the party of totalitarian control and super-delegates are the basis means, of assuring that the "rulers" get to choose which candidate and political philosophy will prevail. Just as on a Federal level they engage in v****g the dead, encouraging i******s to v**e, stuffing b****t boxes and flipping v**es to their candidates.

The issue is a no-brainer for any non-DNC adherent; it is not a choice between "reduce or eliminate". The American spirit demands that this boss control travesty be done away with in its entirety.

Super-delegates are a convention which is at odds with the one man, one v**e, principle this nation was founded on. It is anti-democratic and leads to rule by oligarchy. While the DNC as well as the RNC are private entities they are primarily engaged in providing the candidates for consideration for public office. In this capacity they are an integral part of the e******n process and cannot be considered to have the privileges private organizations claim. I would favor a Federal Law outlawing discretionary b****ts being cast for a primary contender until the second b****t, if needed.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 08:59:25   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
BigMike wrote:
I don't think they want to get c***ted this time around.

"Democratic officials are considering a new proposal to effectively eliminate all superdelegates, a move that would go beyond recommendations put forward late last year by the commission tasked with making the party's p**********l nominating process more fair..."

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/democrats-are-weighing-a-proposal-to-eliminate?utm_term=.mlBOGWv8e#.rfY9o3Agn
I don't think they want to get I c***ted /I this... (show quote)


This shouldn't surprise anyone. The Dems have created a world in which "i*****l i*******ts" have rights, liberal politicians can openly break the law, v****g laws mean nothing anymore, i*********n l*ws mean nothing anymore, and the word "fairness" means laws don't count if it means Dems are hurt by them. There should not be even "discussions" that i******s can remain in this country (including the children). Liberals have changed this country into a place where the "rule of law" means nothing if they consider it "unfair". Instead of changing the laws through Congress, liberals get an "activist judge" to "make a new law". It's d********g!! The word "fairness" is code for "don't obey the law because it is not beneficial to us". The founding fathers are rolling in their graves seeing what this country has become and how their well thought out laws are now a joke.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 10:04:36   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
BigMike wrote:
I don't think they want to get c***ted this time around.

"Democratic officials are considering a new proposal to effectively eliminate all superdelegates, a move that would go beyond recommendations put forward late last year by the commission tasked with making the party's p**********l nominating process more fair..."

https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/democrats-are-weighing-a-proposal-to-eliminate?utm_term=.mlBOGWv8e#.rfY9o3Agn
I don't think they want to get I c***ted /I this... (show quote)


I don't see where they need any delegates at all, there leader Obama will pick the one when the time comes. It's normal c*******t logic.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2018 15:20:18   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
pafret wrote:
It seems the DNC has not learned that retaining super-delegates who do their bidding is not consistent with the will of the people. Bernie Sanders won the New England Primaries but Hillary stole them via Super-delegates. The v**ers responded by abandoning the DNC and v****g for other parties.

The possibilities put forth included depriving senior politicians of the right to primary v**e and this was greeted with horror. Ostensibly because it would disenfranchise the president and congress people who might become super-delegates. But primarily because the DNC is the party of totalitarian control and super-delegates are the basis means, of assuring that the "rulers" get to choose which candidate and political philosophy will prevail. Just as on a Federal level they engage in v****g the dead, encouraging i******s to v**e, stuffing b****t boxes and flipping v**es to their candidates.

The issue is a no-brainer for any non-DNC adherent; it is not a choice between "reduce or eliminate". The American spirit demands that this boss control travesty be done away with in its entirety.

Super-delegates are a convention which is at odds with the one man, one v**e, principle this nation was founded on. It is anti-democratic and leads to rule by oligarchy. While the DNC as well as the RNC are private entities they are primarily engaged in providing the candidates for consideration for public office. In this capacity they are an integral part of the e******n process and cannot be considered to have the privileges private organizations claim. I would favor a Federal Law outlawing discretionary b****ts being cast for a primary contender until the second b****t, if needed.
It seems the DNC has not learned that retaining su... (show quote)


Quite the conundrum. I wonder what the Mummies (Dem "leadership") are thinking.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 07:45:10   #
Big Kahuna
 
cold iron wrote:
I don't see where they need any delegates at all, there leader Obama will pick the one when the time comes. It's normal c*******t logic.


There is no reason to v**e on the demonratic ticket. The DNC (Politboro) has already decided who will be their next corrupt, marxist candidate and if anyone doesn't goosestep in line with the party, a backroom waterboarding session would be employed to be followed by a caning and bit-h slapping by maxipad Waters and an audit by retired with full pension lawbreaker Lois Lerner. Then Hilarious Clinton would fabricate a dossier and buy it and get the lamestream media to pass it on as real news and try to destroy anyone's life if they don't follow the dems, marxist program!! Robert mueller would then be ready to be special prosecuter to upturn every stone and even dwelve into the persons r****t past to see if they preferred to drink white milk over chocolate milk in grade school!! This would go on for 10 years and totally destroy the person, their assets and any heirs inheritance.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 12:59:35   #
badbob85037
 
PeterS wrote:
I guess I missed something--where was the democratic discourse?


Come on! You're a democrat. You miss everything.

Reply
Mar 11, 2018 13:58:36   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Come on! You're a democrat. You miss everything.


The article is ALL Democrat discourse.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2018 14:06:15   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
pafret wrote:
It seems the DNC has not learned that retaining super-delegates who do their bidding is not consistent with the will of the people. Bernie Sanders won the New England Primaries but Hillary stole them via Super-delegates. The v**ers responded by abandoning the DNC and v****g for other parties.

The possibilities put forth included depriving senior politicians of the right to primary v**e and this was greeted with horror. Ostensibly because it would disenfranchise the president and congress people who might become super-delegates. But primarily because the DNC is the party of totalitarian control and super-delegates are the basis means, of assuring that the "rulers" get to choose which candidate and political philosophy will prevail. Just as on a Federal level they engage in v****g the dead, encouraging i******s to v**e, stuffing b****t boxes and flipping v**es to their candidates.

The issue is a no-brainer for any non-DNC adherent; it is not a choice between "reduce or eliminate". The American spirit demands that this boss control travesty be done away with in its entirety.

Super-delegates are a convention which is at odds with the one man, one v**e, principle this nation was founded on. It is anti-democratic and leads to rule by oligarchy. While the DNC as well as the RNC are private entities they are primarily engaged in providing the candidates for consideration for public office. In this capacity they are an integral part of the e******n process and cannot be considered to have the privileges private organizations claim. I would favor a Federal Law outlawing discretionary b****ts being cast for a primary contender until the second b****t, if needed.
It seems the DNC has not learned that retaining su... (show quote)


"The American spirit demands that this boss control travesty be done away with in its entirety."

Chocura was honest enough to admit an elitist government is what the left is looking for. The Establishment muddies that simple fact. This is a good development.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.