SInce I live in Hawaii the only completely demcoratic state in the union since it became a state there is a push for not allowing CCW recipriocity as President Trump has been going for. I responded to a questionare and here is the responce I received.
Mike
Aloha Michael:
Thank you for letting me know of your opposition to resolutions asking our Congressional delegation to oppose "concealed carry reciprocity" legislation. I introduced HCR 37 because it supports Hawaii's current "concealed carry" laws, which I believe protect public safety:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2018/bills/HCR37_.htm"Concealed carry reciprocity" would allow federal law to override our state law that keeps concealed guns from dangerous hands. For example, Hawaii requires safety training for concealed carry permit applicants. We disqualify people with dangerous histories, people with violent misdemeanor records, convicted stalkers, and abusive domestic partners.
I believe we should preserve state authority to set public safety standards for our community. I do not want to place our local law enforcement at risk when encountering an armed out-of-state visitor who may be carrying a firearm without a lawful permit.
Although we may disagree on this issue, I hope you will not hesitate to keep in touch with me in the future.
Mahalo,
Gregg
-----Original Message-----
From: advocacy@mylegislators.com [mailto:advocacy@mylegislators.com] On Behalf Of Michael Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 7:11 PM
To: Rep. Gregg Takayama <reptakayama@capitol.hawaii.gov>
Subject: Please Oppose HCR 37 & HR 29
Dear Representative Gregg Takayama:
As a law abiding Second Amendment supporter in Hawaii, I urge you to please oppose HCR 37 and HR 29.
The fundamental Right to Keep and Bear Arms should not end at the state line. National Concealed Carry Reciprocity would ensure that law-abiding citizens do not forfeit their ability to protect themselves as they travel from state to state, and it would also ensure that they could not be harassed or persecuted for exercising their constitutionally guaranteed rights in their travels.
Again, please oppose HCR 37 and HR 29. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Michael Johnston