Loki Loc: Georgia

So you support the Obama regulations which were overturned by Congress before Trump took office? (All he did was sign the paper.) You support the Obama policies that even the ACLU opposes because it plays fast and loose with the rights of the accused, by denying them due process?
You have the gall to call a Conservative a N**i?

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

BS,,, I have posted time and again that I have no support at all to remove the 2nd amendment..

Loki Loc: Georgia

But you support "gun control" that even the ultra-Liberal ACLU finds offensive. How many mass shootings have been perpetrated by one of the people being denied by the Obama EO? None comes to mind. Matter of fact, I haven't found any shootings attributed to them. Now if he had come up with an EO that forbade people with gang associations from purchasing firearms, THAT would be worth something. But, that would be Raaaaaciiiiiiiist!

Check the FBI Uniform Crime Report. Almost half of all murders are committed by urban black males aged 15-30. Another 20% by Hispanics. (Frequently the illegal ones whose innocence you maintain.) A little over 5% by Native American and Asian. That leaves about 25% committed by w****s who are 65% of the population. More than half of the victims are black. (B****s in general are about 13% of the population). Something like 94% of the time, they are k**led by other b****s.
Most, not all mass shootings are committed by w****s, but as sensational as they are, and as horrible as they are, they represent only a small fraction of the homicides in this country.
There are more than 5 million privately owned AR15 style rifles in this country, and while I am not sure of the numbers of the AK47 knockoffs, they are substantial. In other words, there are nearly 6 million scary looking guns out there that you want to ban because about 20 of them were used to commit a handful of the total murders. A few years ago when our murder rate was far higher than now, you wanted to ban revolvers; yet now revolvers are politically correct and acceptable because they are no longer as popular, even though they are responsible for far more murders over the years than semi-autos.
I suppose when criminals start using Sarin and bombs for mass murders, semis will be subject to the same sort of amnesty that Liberals usually reserve for wetbacks.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

considering that the mass k*****gs are only a small part of the murder in our country, we should ignore them??

After Sandy Hook, the NRA made a pact with the right wing and GOP, a stone wall and do not give the smallest bit of regulation.. You echo that pact.. Made for the sole benefit of gun manufactures..

In fact from the k*****gs at Sandy Hook the only gun regulations passed have been to loosen gun regulations..

will this ever change? I have my doubts.. But with the loss of major sponsors the last few days and the slight changes by a few republicans who will still run for office, we may now see some of these things
accomplished..

the orange guy may have linked up with the NRA to make Rambos of teachers, almost no one else sees that as a plan any smarter then his dumb wall.

lNice night, gotta go...

Loki Loc: Georgia

Nighty night. I'm STILL waiting on a Liberal to explain how any of the "gun control"regulations being proposed would do any good. Why, and how they would be implemented and how they would be enforced.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Try telling that to a Lib.

pafret Loc: Northeast

You could do it with the M1 Garand, only eight rounds so it was a showboat pointless thing to do.

Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face

I agree.