One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Another trump lie exposed, deregulation does not impact the economy lie
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Feb 13, 2018 21:18:15   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
JFlorio wrote:
Still thinks the miners shop at the company store.


That too. You nailed it.

Black lung, that had to be an awful way to go, you know?

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 23:53:12   #
beammeupscotty Loc: 31°07'50.8"N 87°27'00.8"W
 
lindajoy wrote:
Thank You, Scotty...
You have been missed.. Glad you stopped in..
Doing well I hope...


Thank you Linda, hope you are well also. Had a rough 2017 but, so far 2018 has been fantastic!

Reply
Feb 15, 2018 20:30:43   #
Nickolai
 
debeda wrote:
Uh huh. You've obviously never run or done the books for any companies if you believe that. Don't care what article or video is posted. I HAVE run and done the books for companies and I'll go with the empirical evidence, thanks.






I owned my own construction business for 20 years worked in supervision for a company for five years before that and was never bothered by any regulation State or Federal I was signatory to the Carpenters and Painters unions until the big real estate developers managed to bust them and the unions were never a problem. Every three years an new agreement was negotiated between the contractors association and the unions and that was the end of it for another three years. Then the unions were gone and it became dog eat dog.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2018 20:41:49   #
Nickolai
 
lindajoy wrote:
Just as your post, here’s another that argues from the regulation aspect and impact..

In support of each of these steps, opponents of regulation argue that agency rules are damaging to the economy in general and job generation in particular. Some say specific regulations will destroy millions of jobs and cite a study (critiqued later in this paper) purporting to show that regulations cost $1.75 trillion per year. Regulations are frequently discussed only in the context of their threat to job creation, while their role in protecting lives, public health, and the environment is ignored.

This report reviews whether the evidence backs the perspective of regulatory opponents. The first section looks broadly at the effects of regulations, whether they play a useful role in the economy, and whether their overall benefits outweigh their overall costs. The second section assesses the theory and evidence for the assertion that regulations undermine jobs and the economy. The last section examines the kinds of studies that are discussed when regulations are being formulated; these studies, often cited in debates and therefore of great importance, tend to be prospective
estimates of the effects of proposed regulations.
<snip> Plenty more to read..

So, is it to regulate or to deregulate? Does it in itself really change the outcome? I mean if it really doesn't change anything...???

Interesting argument wonder why its not come up before.. Look at the date of the Article I posted and ask, has anything material changed since then??

https://www.epi.org/publication/regulation_employment_and_the_economy_fears_of_job_loss_are_overblown/
Just as your post, here’s another that argues from... (show quote)





Our understanding of human nature, the laws of economics, the history of mankind, and a quick glance in the mirror tell us everything we need to know. In short, that so-called “self-policing” doctrine promoted by free market zealots is a howling fraud.
Just consider other applications of “self-policing.” What if it were applied to our roads and highways? What if motorists were told that no more traffic tickets would be issued? Or what if college and professional athletes were told there would be no more tests for steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs? What if there were no more audits of our tax returns? One of the best examples of the need for stringent government regulation is the April 5, 2010, explosion at the Upper Big Branch coal mine (in Montcoal, West Virginia), which k**led 29 miners. This non-union mine (unaffiliated with the United Mine Workers) was owned and operated by Massey Energy. The reason we mention its non-union status is because there is no way in hell this could have happened in a union mine.

Although the cause of the explosion was eventually traced back to unsafe, substandard mine conditions (the accumulation of flammable gas, among other things), federal investigators found evidence of something far more disturbing.
In order to thwart possible interference of government safety officials, Massey Energy was keeping two sets of books. One set contained all the beautiful, by-the-numbers stuff any federal safety official would rejoice in seeing during a routine mine inspection, and the other contained the actual, untampered-with data (which, in Massey’s case, was incriminating).

Reply
Feb 15, 2018 21:04:49   #
Nickolai
 
EconomistDon wrote:
I would love to see you try to explain that to a room full of coal miners who lost their jobs during the Obama regulatory reign of terror. Coal mining jobs are coming back big time since Trump started to clean up the Obama regulation mess. Fathers can feed their kids again and buy them new clothes. For them, America is becoming great again.






This is nonsense Your dreaming again Don
In Decatur, Ill., far from the coal mines of Appalachia, Caterpillar engineers are working on the future of mining: mammoth haul trucks that drive themselves.
The trucks have no drivers, not even remote operators. Instead, the 850,000-pound vehicles rely on self-driving technology, the latest in an increasingly autonomous line of trucks and drills that are removing some of the human element from digging for coal.
When President Trump moved to dismantle the Obama administration’s c*****e c****e efforts, he promised it would bring coal-mining jobs back to America. But the jobs he alluded to — hardy miners in mazelike tunnels with picks and shovels — have steadily become vestiges of the past.

Pressured by cheap and abundant natural gas, coal is in a precipitous decline, now making up just a third of electricity generation in the United States. Renewables are fast becoming competitive with coal on price. Electricity sales are trending downward, and coal exports are falling.
All the while, the coal industry has been replacing workers with machines and explosives. Energy and labor specialists say that no one — including Mr. Trump — can bring them all back.

Reply
Feb 15, 2018 21:20:03   #
Nickolai
 
lindajoy wrote:
I would say because of the unemployment numbers...

Ohhh and he decreased government jobs too.. Decreased, good gosh, 16k canned he needs to make it 75% then we’ll have a party..

On Friday morning, the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics released employment numbers for December, bookending President Trump’s first year in office. While the number of jobs added was lower than many analysts expected — up 148,000 — it was a continuation of the trend of growth seen over the course of 2017.

With those numbers in hand, we can now compare Trump’s first year in office to his predecessors’. And in that comparison, Trump comes out looking pretty good.

Relative to the figure from January in each president’s first year in office (excluding those presidents who took office after a death or resignation), Trump saw one of the biggest percentage-point drops in the unemployment rate.

The only presidents with larger drops were Bill Clinton in 1993 (a decline of 0.8 points) and Jimmy Carter in 1977 (down 1.1). Both of those presidents, though, ended their first years with much higher unemployment rates, both over 6 percent.

There’s a trend that you’ll notice in these charts. Trump’s immediate predecessor, Barack Obama, saw a surge in the unemployment rate during his first year, a function of the effects of the recession that was just beginning to wind down. Relative to Obama’s first year in office, Trump’s was consistently very good.<snip>

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/politics/wp/2018/01/05/trumps-first-year-jobs-numbers-were-very-very-good/
I would say because of the unemployment numbers...... (show quote)






Well yeah Obama inherited a great recession with 750,000 jobs down the tube every month an a 1.3 trillion deficit on the desk of the oval office. Trump inherited a healthy economy and an economic trend stock market and rising job market that began in Dec 2009

Reply
Feb 15, 2018 21:23:11   #
Nickolai
 
vernon wrote:
Regulations do destroy jobs just look at how this economy has picked up since these regulations we repealed.And he has 2 or 3 thousand more to do away with.Have you listened to Trump trying to do away with all these state and government regulations to build a roed,It takes an average of 10 years to get a road permitted.There are thousands of regulations just to build an oil refinery in the U S..i think that is the reason there hasn't
been a refinery built in this country in at least 30 yrs.
Regulations do destroy jobs just look at how this ... (show quote)





Oil and coal is 19th century technology and will go the way of the dinosaurs eventually and sooner than you think

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2018 21:59:34   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
Nickolai wrote:
Well yeah Obama inherited a great recession with 750,000 jobs down the tube every month an a 1.3 trillion deficit on the desk of the oval office. Trump inherited a healthy economy and an economic trend stock market and rising job market that began in Dec 2009


Nikki...the ONLY thing we inherited from obama was evil, and grief!!

Reply
Feb 15, 2018 23:52:50   #
Nickolai
 
kankune wrote:
Nikki...the ONLY thing we inherited from obama was evil, and grief!!






245 Things President Obama Has Accomplished That Conservatives Don’t Want You To Know About

We got a recovery from a near depression that is in its ninth year and the all time record for a recovery from recession is 10 years so this Recovery is reaching its soon to be limit. There is no economic driver that could drive the recovery to a new record. Obama only had 15 months of control of congress and in his 8 years Republicans filibustered every bill proposed by democrats. In any event Obama still managed to make some progress

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 00:38:27   #
debeda
 
Nickolai wrote:
I owned my own construction business for 20 years worked in supervision for a company for five years before that and was never bothered by any regulation State or Federal I was signatory to the Carpenters and Painters unions until the big real estate developers managed to bust them and the unions were never a problem. Every three years an new agreement was negotiated between the contractors association and the unions and that was the end of it for another three years. Then the unions were gone and it became dog eat dog.
I owned my own construction business for 20 years ... (show quote)


Do you understand the difference between federal regulations and collective bargaining? Doesn't sound like it.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 00:39:32   #
debeda
 
kankune wrote:
Nikki...the ONLY thing we inherited from obama was evil, and grief!!



Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2018 22:02:16   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
Nickolai wrote:
245 Things President Obama Has Accomplished That Conservatives Don’t Want You To Know About

We got a recovery from a near depression that is in its ninth year and the all time record for a recovery from recession is 10 years so this Recovery is reaching its soon to be limit. There is no economic driver that could drive the recovery to a new record. Obama only had 15 months of control of congress and in his 8 years Republicans filibustered every bill proposed by democrats. In any event Obama still managed to make some progress
245 Things President Obama Has Accomplished That C... (show quote)


Yep..the ONLY progress he made was tearing this country apart!!!

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 14:27:16   #
EconomistDon
 
Nickolai wrote:
This is nonsense Your dreaming again Don
In Decatur, Ill., far from the coal mines of Appalachia, Caterpillar engineers are working on the future of mining: mammoth haul trucks that drive themselves.
The trucks have no drivers, not even remote operators. Instead, the 850,000-pound vehicles rely on self-driving technology, the latest in an increasingly autonomous line of trucks and drills that are removing some of the human element from digging for coal.
When President Trump moved to dismantle the Obama administration’s c*****e c****e efforts, he promised it would bring coal-mining jobs back to America. But the jobs he alluded to — hardy miners in mazelike tunnels with picks and shovels — have steadily become vestiges of the past.

Pressured by cheap and abundant natural gas, coal is in a precipitous decline, now making up just a third of electricity generation in the United States. Renewables are fast becoming competitive with coal on price. Electricity sales are trending downward, and coal exports are falling.
All the while, the coal industry has been replacing workers with machines and explosives. Energy and labor specialists say that no one — including Mr. Trump — can bring them all back.
This is nonsense Your dreaming again Don br In Dec... (show quote)


So what is your point? Deep mines have been a thing of the past. Coal in the Appalachian Mountains is strip mined. The top layers are removed for later replacement; then huge d**g lines scoop up the coal. This has been the process for most of the last half century. Apparently you just learned this. But the strip mines where I grew up were all shut down by Obama era regulations. They are now reopening. And its not just d**g line operators and explosive experts; its truck drivers, coal tipple operators, railroad workers, and power plant workers. Many jobs were affected.

You seem to think that conservative want to eliminate "all" regulations. That is typical Democrat nonsense; its what they blabber when conservative resist over-regulation. Fact is, we just want the stupid, unnecessary regulations eliminated. Obama's administration was responsible for about 3000 new regulations. I guarantee that many, or possibly most were stupid and unnecessary. Nobody is arguing to eliminate "necessary" regulations -- get it?

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 14:36:12   #
EconomistDon
 
Nickolai wrote:
Oil and coal is 19th century technology and will go the way of the dinosaurs eventually and sooner than you think


Oil and coal would go away faster if you Democrats would get your heads out of your butts over nuclear energy. Until that happens, there aren't enough solar cells and wind turbines to replace f****l f**l energy. You can't force technology change without destroying jobs and damaging the economy. Democrats never understand that. It takes time and open markets to make the change. Stop destroying peoples' livelihoods by forcing the issue.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 14:44:01   #
bahmer
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Oil and coal would go away faster if you Democrats would get your heads out of your butts over nuclear energy. Until that happens, there aren't enough solar cells and wind turbines to replace f****l f**l energy. You can't force technology change without destroying jobs and damaging the economy. Democrats never understand that. It takes time and open markets to make the change. Stop destroying peoples' livelihoods by forcing the issue.


What is that saying if you build a better mousetrap the world will beat a path to your door. As of yet we have not built a better mousetrap. Until that happens coal and oil will remain king.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.