Brian Devon wrote:
You don't need deep conspiratorial research to unearth the Clinton sins. They are all there up front and center for all to see. I'm not talking about Bill's "romantic" adventures.
I know I must sound repetitive but I really am deeply troubled by the idea of a Clinton 2.0 presidency.
Just a quick review:
Bill Clinton pushed through NAFTA, which caused many high paying jobs to be outsourced to Singapore, China, India and Mexico, where the multi-nationals could pay vastly lower wages and not have to worry about the EPA forcing them to protect clean water and air. *(You have a thin understanding of NAFTA: For one, the US had enjoyed such prosperity we had grown into a consumer nation unable to compete in the world marketplace. The Bush Recession was certainly exacerbated by this fact and NAFTA attempted to t***sition our country toward a sustainable market position. It would never "Feel Good" but it was a necessary response for a viable economic future. That fact has not been disproven at all.)*
Bill pushed through the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act, which prevented banks and brokerages from having overlapping interests. It was originally passed during the depression to prevent another financial collapse from happening again. Result of the repeal? Brokerages started bundling and trading mortgages like they were baseball cards. Economic depression? You betcha. *(That's is one theory.....)*
What about the short version of Hillary's sins?
Being a shill for Wall Street. Taking $400,000 for two speeches to Goldman Sachs. *(Speech for profit is hardly unique- shill for wall street is pretty interpretive- even if I am no fan of valuing unearned wage of hard work, this is how our free market system works. You aren't some socialist type are you???)*
V****g in favor of launching a war against Iraq. *(Solidarity with the duly elected CinC, Bush, during national emergency seems unfortunate in retrospect- because of the bad decision-making, but is hardly inappropriate)*
Being opposed to international land mine treaties (Its not her children losing arms, legs, eyes, and lives). *(Not the reason she v**ed nay- read more and cut and paste less)*
Being opposed to restrictions on armaments sales to the nations with the worst human rights violations. *(Again, not the reason for her v**e- more poorly informed cut-n-paste)*
Bill and Hillary jointly? How about the fact that they are really more an English royalty type merger rather than a genuine marriage. *(You are going downhill fast now)*
Clinton Inc. is now worth over a $ hundred million. Isn't it incredible how well they have invested Bill's p**********l pension so well? Think they might owe anyone some special favors? *(Getting even more confused- When speaking of your own you generally see wealth as proof of merit and free-market, trickle-down at work for freedom and prosperity. Which is it???)*
No need to get into black opps and clandestine interviews in an underground Watergate garage. Their danger to this nation is out there as plain as day. The Democrats, especially, need to wise up to the danger these people present to working Americans and vulnerable innocents in third world countries. *(Blackwater, Martial Law Lite, Scuds and Drones, Special Forces, Renditioning, Pre-emptive War Doctrine...?)*
It takes a whole village to raise a child, Hillary? *(Correct- community is crucial- Me-the-People is not the America I love. Jesus agrees.)*
How about, "it takes a whole village to bury a child that has stepped on a land mine?"
You don't need deep conspiratorial research to une... (
show quote)
I have a variety of reasons why I am less than enthused with H Clinton- but none of the above GOP talking points of semi-fact. What tips the balance in her favor is A)- that she has matured since her First Lady and Senate days into somebody I could live with in the White House and, unfortunately, the GOP candidates who are emerging measure up but poorly in comparison. Find a GOP "Statesman" to run on a coherent platform and get back to me.