Ricktloml

We hear Democrats and their lap dogs in the media tell us that a border wall would be ineffective, and useless. Are they right?

India and Pakistan

The two nuclear powers, with 1.5 billion people between them, have fought four wars since 1947, and continue to face each other down in Kashmir, a territory both countries dispute. In order to prevent Pakistani terrorists from striking inside India, the Indian government built a series of fences and walls to keep Pakistani terrorists at bay. Had it not, it is quite possible that the two countries might be at war right now.


Morocco and Algeria

Morocco built a 1,700-mile system of berms, fences and ditches to stop the Polisario Front, an Algerian sponsored terrorist group, from infiltrating the Western Sahara. It took seven years to build, but the result was so effective that Algeria agreed to a cease-fire, ending the Western Sahara war that had raged since 1975.


Israel and the West Bank

The Israeli border wall-well, actually more of a fence in most places-remains hugely controversial because many journalists and the UN officials condemn anything Israel does, no matter how much precedent exists outside Israel but, Israel's fence reduced terrorist attacks by more than 90%, something decades of diplomacy failed to do.


Cyprus

The irony of of so many UN officials condemning Israel or Trump's demands for a wall is that the UN itself built a wall dividing Cyprus in order to separate Turkish and Greek combatants. While Cyprus remains divided, the wall ended the fighting.

Northern Ireland

Saudi Arabia and Yemen

Saudi Arabia and Iraq

Turkey and Syria

Kenya and Somalia

Then there is another list of countries where a wall was built for immigration purposes


www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-border-wall-is-standard...other.../2646819

RETW Loc: Washington

johnmont

We need no wall to stop i*****l i*********n,all we need to do is arrest and jail the CEOs of corporations that hire i******s.two to five years would do it.Specialy after a few find husbands while in prison.

kenvrla Loc: East Tx Piney Woods

Mandatory E-verify would stop most of it. Along with a wall, it would be a win-win.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

The dems don't want the wall they need the v**es...

johnmont

PROVE that democrats use i******s to v**e or shut the hell up.You republican sheeple have accused the democrats of v***r f***d for almost a century but have never shown one iota of proof. Or is it that the republicans are too stupid and incompetent to catch and convict them?

kenvrla Loc: East Tx Piney Woods

Is that how u talk to ladies? D********g

SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now

Did the lady disrespect you? If so, I missed it so maybe YOU need to "shut the hell up". The thing I notice is that anytime anything is mentioned about how the demonrats need i******s coming across the border and then being allowed to v**e to get back in power the libtards go stupid and start on their predictable rant about no i******s ever v**e.
I reckon my response to you is PROVE no i******s v**ed. Seems to me the demoncrats might be, as you so eliquently stated "too stupid and incompetent" to win e******ns without illegal v**ers.
SGM B out.

TrueAmerican

To all who say we do not need a wall; IF YOU HAVE A FENCE AROUND YOUR PROPERTY... TAKE IT DOWN ! IF YOUR HAVE DOORS ON YOUR HOUSE... TAKE THEM DOWN... NOW see how safe you feel !

johnmont

That's not how we do things here! When someone accuses someone of a crime the accuser has to PROVE his guilt in a court of law!so come on show us all of those hundreds thousands of convictions for v***r f***d. Or is it that the republicans are too incompetent to catch and convict the democrats?

SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now

How is it that in some precincts there were more v**es cast than registered v**ers? Why is it that some democrat states issue drivers licenses to anyone who shows up, with no requirement to show proof of citizenship?
I don't know how many illegal v**es were cast, but I believe it was more than just a few. Can I prove who v**ed illegally? Nope. But it isn't hard to conclude that if more v**es were cast than registered v**ers, someone isn't playing by the rules. I'm sure you are not in favor of v**er ID, but if you walk into a v****g station here, you don't get a b****t.
SGM B out.

johnmont

First you have to prove to me that she,s Is a lady I accuse her of not being a lady.Prove to me that she is.

Lonewolf

Now your talking but the rich republican business owners will never agree to it.

johnmont

Where In The Drivers License Laws (which are State laws) Is There A Requirement Of Citizenship (Which is a federal matter)?

Again ,I don't object to v**er IDs as long as they are easy to get everywhere.How can I know that you are not lying about more v**es being cast then people in the districts? And how can I know that the extra v**es weren't v**es cast for republicans? That's the best way to hide what you are doing ! Accuse the other side of doing what you are doing. The republicans have always been good at that kind of deflection.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

Here ya go johnnie boyo, read em and weep!

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450413/registered-v**ers-outnumber-eligible-v**ers-least-462-counties