One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Armed In America: New book shows Americans do not have the individual right to bear arms
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jan 29, 2018 02:14:17   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
rumitoid wrote:
Sorry, guess I missed something. What does the CDC have to do with the topic?

CDC: National Center for Health Statistics/ Assault and Homicide stats
On November 3, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a 14-page report on gun violence in Wilmington, Delaware, a medium-sized city of roughly 70,000 residents that also experiences one of the highest murder rates in the country.

CDC: Elevated Rates of Urban Firearm Violence and Opportunities for Prevention—Wilmington, Delaware

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 06:06:23   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
rumitoid wrote:
You still amaze and disappointment me. Did you sell your name to some angry middle school kid or a senior in an old age home? "Drivel" is only what you can actually refute. Just calling it "drivel" is childish, inane.


Unfortunately for you, it is also true.

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 06:11:15   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
rumitoid wrote:
Way too funny. This is a total fabrication. A parody of facts. Those states (google it) with the loosest gun laws have the highest gun violence. Think Louisiana. Or most of the Southern States.

Think why don't you use some of those cites and facts you insist on others using?

Reply
 
 
Jan 29, 2018 06:23:19   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
rumitoid wrote:
Taking all you said as true about the crime statistics, which I have no reason to doubt, how do we fix the problem? Is there a way without violating the Constitution?

"Oh yes, the book you mentioned? Is it as imaginary as it's incorrect conclusion?" No. Patrick J. Charles doesn’t keep readers in suspense as to his interpretation. In his introduction to Armed in America: A History of Gun Rights from Colonial M*****as to Concealed Carry, Mr. Charles states: “the Second Amendment was neither legally intended nor legally understood by the Founding Fathers as protecting a right to armed individual self-defense.”

So there you have it – if you buy into Charles’s detailed exegesis. Charles, a historian and legal scholar, spent almost 10 years digging deeply into the issue of gun rights. And he has written a credible record of what he learned, which led to his conclusions. https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2018/0126/Armed-in-America-asks-exactly-what-the-Founding-Fathers-intended-with-the-Second-Amendment
Taking all you said as true about the crime statis... (show quote)


*****************

Since you finally decided to reveal the name of your tome and it's author, and you did so on another post, I will reply with the same post I used there.
Your Patrick J Charles has apparently never read the comment of the men who actually wrote the Second Amendment, or else decided to ignore them since they clash with his desired conclusion. Let's start with George Washington:

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions.”
-George Washington, Debates of the Massachusetts Convention of February 6, 1788

Patrick J. Charles (whose name and book you never mentioned until now, incidentally) seems to have forgotten all about our first president.
****
How about a few from the guy who wrote the Declaration of Independence?

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
– Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”
– Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.”
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824

****

“To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to ens***e them.”
– George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

"I ask who are the m*****a? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”
– George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

*******
How about another president?

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the m*****a officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.”
– James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated m*****a, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.”
– James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…”
– James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
Before you jump on the "well-regulated" bandwagon, bear in mind that in the 18th century, "well-regulated" had little or nothing to do with government control.
http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

*****

“A m*****a when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”
– Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

******

Then there was old Patrick Henry. You DO remember him, don't you?

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.”
– Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778

“Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”
Patrick Henry, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution

******

“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance ofpower is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these t***hs, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves.”
– Thomas Paine, “Thoughts on Defensive War” in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775

********

“And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions.”
– Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

*******

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”
– Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833

*****
“As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.”
– Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789

“The m*****a of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the m*****a? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the m*****a. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American … the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
-Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788

*******
"(C)onceived it to be the privilege of every citizen, and one of his most essential rights, to bear arms, and to resist every attack upon his liberty or property, by whomsoever made. The particular States, like private citizens, have a right to be armed, and to defend by force of arms, their rights, when invaded.”
-Roger Sherman, Debates on 1790 M*****a Act

*********

“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”
-Zachariah Johnson, Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 25, 1788
******

I suppose Patrick J. Charles never heard of any of these men; of if he did, ignored them because they disagreed with him and he is ever so much smarter than them. In all fairness, I would like to give Mr. Patrick J. Charles an opportunity to give us readers one instance, just one, in which one of the authors of the Second Amendment stated that the Right to Bear Arms was NOT an individual right. Just one. From the authors

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 07:16:21   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
rumitoid wrote:
Sorry, guess I missed something. What does the CDC have to do with the topic?


Their study showing no relationship between gun control laws and reduction in crime.

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 07:19:41   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
I'll go with my own experience with guns (which is considerable) and the facts revealed by an independent crime research institution rather than the media hyped, emotionally charged, highly prejudiced anti-gun hacks writing for such liberal slums as "thinkprogress" and HuffPo.

Murders in US very concentrated: 54% of US counties in 2014 had zero murders, 2% of counties have 51% of the murders

In case you are wondering, this is a map of the United States prepared by Crime Prevention Research Center, all those areas colored in various shades of red are where the crime in this country is concentrated. Please note also that those areas shaded dark red are conclaves of democrat rule where gun laws are most restrictive and where the majority of i*****l i*******ts are located.

All of southern California (including SF, LA, and SD), Seattle, WA. (the San Francisco of the Pacific Northwest), Clark county, NV (Las Vegas), Denver, CO, Phoenix and Tuscon, AZ, Albuquerque, NM, Dallas, Austin, and Houston, TX, Kansas City and St Louis, MO, Chicago, IL, Detroit, MI, Cleveland, OH, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, Boston, MA, NYC, NY, Washington DC., Wilmington, DE, Birmingham AL, Atlanta, GA, Miami (Dade County), FL.
I'll go with my own experience with guns (which is... (show quote)

My, my, look at all that peace and love from the land of fruits, nuts, and tolerance. Should make Brown, Pelosi, and Waters beam with p***e if not for their ignorance.



Reply
Jan 29, 2018 10:25:34   #
JoyV
 
rumitoid wrote:
Sorry, guess I missed something. What does the CDC have to do with the topic?


The link I posted to the CDC stats on gun violence.

Reply
 
 
Jan 29, 2018 10:29:10   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
2wheeljunkie wrote:
My, my, look at all that peace and love from the land of fruits, nuts, and tolerance. Should make Brown, Pelosi, and Waters beam with p***e if not for their ignorance.


She meant everyone who isn't paid to carry a gun to protect her fat lesbian ass.

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 11:30:50   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
Loki wrote:
She meant everyone who isn't paid to carry a gun to protect her fat lesbian ass.

So true.

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 13:44:46   #
kcstargoat
 
rumitoid wrote:
Ten years in research, meticulously and thoroughly screened, all reviewers say the author is correct.

And even if he is wrong, 11 school shootings in the first year of 2018: that's an acceptable cost of freedom? Do nothing?

We are by a wide margin the most violent nation of the so-called Free and Democratic World. It will take the combined deaths or injuries from guns of the five nearest countries to us to equal our stats. You don't have a problem with that fact? Again, the price of freedom?

What is the real threat? Right wing conspiracy! "The Left wants our guns so they can swoop down in Black helicopters in the middle of the night, with Left-wing's elite Russian force, to confiscate all weapons for their c**p." This is the only reason we do not have sane gun control measures. NRA propaganda.

The Second Amendment is not sacrosanct, and even if misinterpreted to mean all citizens have the right to bear arms, we have a clear mandate to make such possession "regulated." Controlled. The State is not enough. It needs to be federal, as originally intended. Universal!

A failure to do is playing the role of the "permissive parent": "Go and k**l, my son and daughter, but be home for late night snacks. Our Constitution loves you no matter what. It is your freedom."
Ten years in research, meticulously and thoroughly... (show quote)

Your points are facetious, if nothing else. I can't divine whether you are a liberal, or a lightly sarcastic conservative! The right to bear arms is the right to utilize such arms to protect our freedoms, such as they may be. Only a miniscule fraction of the American public use guns to commit crimes or in self defense.

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 14:07:52   #
Neander
 
My goodness; "all the reviewers think he is right". The only opinions that count are those of the Supreme Court, and as of this date they have not abrogated our right to bear arms.

In the end it will be the will of the people that matters. Over time, if our country survives, it will be the makeup of the SCOTUS that determines which, if any, restrictions are placed on gun ownership and use.

Reply
 
 
Jan 29, 2018 16:08:46   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
rumitoid wrote:
"That those cities, counties, and countries with prohibitive firearm laws are the most violent" is an outright lie. Google the ten most worse states for gun violence and eight of them have the loosest gun laws. The most relaxed on that list about guns are in the top five.

From https://thinkprogress.org/study-states-with-loose-gun-laws-have-higher-rates-of-gun-violence-a4f6cdf6b570/
The National Rifle Association (NRA) and its allies in Congress frequently claim that gun violence is highest in places with the toughest crime laws. But a new study from the Center for American Progress (CAP) suggests something closer to the opposite is true — the states with laxer gun laws tend to be the ones contributing the highest shares of national gun deaths and injuries.

The authors of the report, called “America Under The Gun,” developed a list of ten indices of gun violence, ranging from gun homicide levels to firearm assaults to crime gun export rate (the number of guns sold in that state used in crimes around the country), and ranked each state from 1–50 along each index. They then took the average of each state’s ranking to determine its overall level of gun violence relative to other states. Lousiana was the highest, with an average of fifth-worst across all ten indices, while Hawaii’s 45.4 ranking was the best.

While many factors contribute to the rates of gun violence in any state, our research clearly demonstrates a significant correlation between the strength of a state’s gun laws and the prevalence of gun violence in the state. Across the key indicators of gun violence that we analyzed, the 10 states with the weakest gun laws collectively have a level of gun violence that is more than twice as high — 104 percent higher — than the 10 states with the strongest gun laws.
"That those cities, counties, and countries w... (show quote)

What else could one expect from the extreme far left Center for American Progress?

Reply
Jan 29, 2018 16:58:02   #
promilitary
 
rumitoid wrote:
Ten years in research, meticulously and thoroughly screened, all reviewers say the author is correct.

And even if he is wrong, 11 school shootings in the first year of 2018: that's an acceptable cost of freedom? Do nothing?

We are by a wide margin the most violent nation of the so-called Free and Democratic World. It will take the combined deaths or injuries from guns of the five nearest countries to us to equal our stats. You don't have a problem with that fact? Again, the price of freedom?

What is the real threat? Right wing conspiracy! "The Left wants our guns so they can swoop down in Black helicopters in the middle of the night, with Left-wing's elite Russian force, to confiscate all weapons for their c**p." This is the only reason we do not have sane gun control measures. NRA propaganda.

The Second Amendment is not sacrosanct, and even if misinterpreted to mean all citizens have the right to bear arms, we have a clear mandate to make such possession "regulated." Controlled. The State is not enough. It needs to be federal, as originally intended. Universal!

A failure to do is playing the role of the "permissive parent": "Go and k**l, my son and daughter, but be home for late night snacks. Our Constitution loves you no matter what. It is your freedom."
Ten years in research, meticulously and thoroughly... (show quote)


First, what part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?

Second, I would need a list of the "reviewers."
We are, per capita, VERY LOW on the list of gun violence. Britain is much higher and the
have gun control!! But let's take a look at Switzerland on the other end of the spectrum.
All males over 18 must serve two years in the military; then they not only get to keep their weapon when they are discharged, they are REQUIRED to maintain it in their homes. Switzerland has almost no violent crime.
Now let's take a look at history.....One of the first things Stalin did was confiscate guns. One of the first things Hitler did was create a gun "registry". Total confiscation soon followed.....
turn in your guns, we will have a safer society, the military and police will protect you. How'd that work out????
As to "regulated." It's already regulated and it IS FEDERAL. And there is already federal background check. When you go in to purchase a gun you are required to fill out the federal form and there is an FBI check right then and there. The problem lies in the fact that those who fail the background check are not arrested and prosecuted.
There has been mention of UN gun control, i.e., confiscation which is the only path to gun control. Lots of luck with that. Really, how do you propose that the nutless UN might gather up our guns? A government buy-back? The vast majority of American gunowers are never
ever going to all for that crap. Mandatory surrender of all guns? That's laughable. There are millions of guns in the hands of American citizens for which there are NO records.
Now let's look at "gun safety" which is the new mantra for the Brady Bunch and Bloomberg. During the most recent heavy hunting season there were 600,000 h****rs in the State of Wisconsin. (This would comprise the 8th larges army in the world...more men under arms than the militaries of Germany and France combined). Over 750,000 h****rs hit the woods in Pennsylvania; more than 100,000 in Michigan and over 250,000 in Virginia....to name a few. Now multiply that by the other 46 states, that's millions more. Given that kind of well trained home-grown firepower, America will forever be safe from foreign invasion. It's not just a way to fill the freezer; it's a point of national security (that doesn't cost the taxpayers a dime.) Our own government might not see it this way....the likes of Diane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi.....but it is the reason our enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see us disarmed. The reason STATED BY THE JAPANESE that they did not invade our country was because their top military leaders said.....In the United States there is a gun behind every
blade of grass.
As to the "m*****a." In most states every gun owner over the age of eighteen is automatically part of that state's m*****a.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.