2bltap wrote:
When the MSM and others like the Democratic party continously spout the number of 800,000 DACA recipients it is so false its amazing!!!! The actuall number is closer to 3.5 to 4 million DACA recipients. This number not only includes the number of those between the agaes 16 to 35 years of age but would also include all of the family members from mothers and fathers to all of their relatives that would be allowed to remain or come in. So there is no argument that the Democratic party along with RHINOS such as Flake and Graham, Gutierez, Durbin and a few others are and have been lieing to the American public to the Nth degree. The Democrats have been obviously obvuscating the actuall numbers and the inherit crimes associated with the DACA and ilegal immigrant community. Here is a good video that tucker Carlson had with a couple of intelligent and patriotic Americans. I really believe that the number of crimes that have been committed by ILLEGAL IMIGRANTS, not only mexican but others from third world countries has been astrinomical to say the least. Please watch this relatively short video and tell me that the BS from the progressive left peraining to the low crime rate of these so called dreamers is true or not.
Semper Fi
https://youtu.be/_Sz-CMOPacsWhen the MSM and others like the Democratic party ... (
show quote)
People commit heinous crimes because they are mainly frustrated and at their wits end, so can no longer be clever or amusing to any audience.
That's heinous crimes committed making an affront to human dignity.
Usually heinous crimes are categorised as, no-collar crimes, and bottom of the barrel blue collar crimes.
Now, !! although they are more shocking, they are socially the most desirable crimes of all because technically, on a personal level, where in fact legality comes from, everyone can understand them and accept them more easily as they are often the result of a heinous environment.
In theory white-collar crimes are truely despicable because they purvey insincerity.
P***e is not severely hampered at the bottom of the scale but works its way up until it get to white collar crime and becomes the perfect crime that was rejected in its perfection by a reasonable amount, p***e becomes adversely affected by failure.
So the indecent act becomes a flaw in the Creators mould and is often overcome by a financial contribution to the settlement.
It's not reasonable to make a video about crime and not distinguish the types, due to the fact that behavioural compulsions are not subject to the same legal discernment as calculated acts violating trust.
We all know that the fabric of legality contradicts legal practice, whereby understanding is legislated and provided for uncontrollable acts of illegal behaviour and conversely calculated dishonesty is meant to be judged much more harshly.
In the video desperation is presented as the cause of National calamity, which is out of sync with the fabric of National legal codes if not legal practice, but the video is a component of social fabric not legal code or practice, so it should reflect fairness indicative of legal and National ethics.
It doesn't do this and attempts to exploit corrupt legal practices by giving them a pretext of moral standing.
I'm surprised that it wasn't two uncle Tommy's face masks making both the absurd speeches.
"No-collar crimes" are a flaw in the Social mould, and should be seen in that light, in agreement with legal principles and presented as such, in this case that would be a contradiction of the purpose of the video's intention.
And so in the hypocritical abstruse jingoistic atmosphere that this video was made in, to be consistent it would be much better if it said that only white collar crimes should be allowed, and this could eaisly be arranged, just give everyone a white collar job.
This would be far more realistic that trying to abolish poverty while moving in the opposite direction.