Breaking: Democrats V**e To Keep Fusion GPS Documents Secret
By Becky Loggia
January 19, 2018 at 11:10am
Members of the House Intelligence Committee v**ed Thursday to make available the reports of documented abuse of the FISA program, but not all seemed to be on board with the move.
The four-page memo revealed the alleged surveillance abuses by the U.S. government, yet many Democrats v**ed against making it available for everyone to see, according to The Wall Street Journal. The Journal highlights that left-leaning officials v**ed to release Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’ interview with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson on behalf of t***sparency, but were silent when it came to the t***sparency of a memo that would list abuses regarding the FBI. “Every Democrat v**ed against letting the rest of the House see a memo that will list the facts about the FBI’s use of FISA warrants to surveil members of the Trump campaign in 2016,” the article states. “Strange. What are Democrats afraid of?”
Democrat Adam Schiff has even been a vocal force in demanding accountability regarding the Trump-Russia probe, but his “outrage evaporates” when confronted with the role “Fusion GPS and its Democratic financiers” may have played in the abuse of warrants that would allow eavesdropping on American civilians. And that information, many sources say, needs to be made public.
According to Fox News, the process for releasing such information to the public involves a v**e from the committee and, upon approval, can be released so long as no objections arise from the White House within five days. Yet, even with the recent v**e approving the t***sparency of the documents, questions have been raised as to the alleged abuses that lie therein — and it seems those concerns have been going on for quite some time.
Back in December, Nunes admitted that his investigators had uncovered evidence that the government was abusing surveillance practices, though it seemed to fall on deaf ears.
“I believe there’s evidence that abuses have occurred,” Nunes had said, with many now sharing that same sentiment.
Many Republican officials called the evidence “shocking,” “alarming,” and one congressman even likened the information to the Russian KGB.
Though lawmakers couldn’t yet give the details of what the memo contained, they stressed that it should be made public as soon as possible.
“It is so alarming the American people have to see this,” said Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan.
“You think about, ‘is this happening in America or is this the KGB?’ That’s how alarming it is,” added Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry, with others such as Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz admitting that some could possibly lose their jobs once the information is released.
“It’s troubling. It is shocking,” admitted North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows.
“Part of me wishes that I didn’t read it because I don’t want to believe that those kinds of things could be happening in this country that I call home and love so much.”
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Breaking: Democrats V**e To Keep Fusion GPS Documents Secret
By Becky Loggia
January 19, 2018 at 11:10am
Members of the House Intelligence Committee v**ed Thursday to make available the reports of documented abuse of the FISA program, but not all seemed to be on board with the move.
The four-page memo revealed the alleged surveillance abuses by the U.S. government, yet many Democrats v**ed against making it available for everyone to see, according to The Wall Street Journal. The Journal highlights that left-leaning officials v**ed to release Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’ interview with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson on behalf of t***sparency, but were silent when it came to the t***sparency of a memo that would list abuses regarding the FBI. “Every Democrat v**ed against letting the rest of the House see a memo that will list the facts about the FBI’s use of FISA warrants to surveil members of the Trump campaign in 2016,” the article states. “Strange. What are Democrats afraid of?”
Democrat Adam Schiff has even been a vocal force in demanding accountability regarding the Trump-Russia probe, but his “outrage evaporates” when confronted with the role “Fusion GPS and its Democratic financiers” may have played in the abuse of warrants that would allow eavesdropping on American civilians. And that information, many sources say, needs to be made public.
According to Fox News, the process for releasing such information to the public involves a v**e from the committee and, upon approval, can be released so long as no objections arise from the White House within five days. Yet, even with the recent v**e approving the t***sparency of the documents, questions have been raised as to the alleged abuses that lie therein — and it seems those concerns have been going on for quite some time.
Back in December, Nunes admitted that his investigators had uncovered evidence that the government was abusing surveillance practices, though it seemed to fall on deaf ears.
“I believe there’s evidence that abuses have occurred,” Nunes had said, with many now sharing that same sentiment.
Many Republican officials called the evidence “shocking,” “alarming,” and one congressman even likened the information to the Russian KGB.
Though lawmakers couldn’t yet give the details of what the memo contained, they stressed that it should be made public as soon as possible.
“It is so alarming the American people have to see this,” said Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan.
“You think about, ‘is this happening in America or is this the KGB?’ That’s how alarming it is,” added Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry, with others such as Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz admitting that some could possibly lose their jobs once the information is released.
“It’s troubling. It is shocking,” admitted North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows.
“Part of me wishes that I didn’t read it because I don’t want to believe that those kinds of things could be happening in this country that I call home and love so much.”
Breaking: Democrats V**e To Keep Fusion GPS Docume... (
show quote)
The Dems are deathly afraid, and rightly so, of those reports becoming public knowledge.
They are slippery cons the democrats. They are already blaming the Russians and saying that the information is f**e.
Gotta give those democrats credit, they stick together and all lie in unison.
I'm sure that some republicans will side with obama and hilliar and the media and the democrats. They might think that this is too big to prosecute. History can't afford the prosecution of a former First Lady and two former presidents.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
They are slippery cons the democrats. They are already blaming the Russians and saying that the information is f**e.
Gotta give those democrats credit, they stick together and all lie in unison.
I'm sure that some republicans will side with obama and hilliar and the media and the democrats. They might think that this is too big to prosecute. History can't afford the prosecution of a former First Lady and two former presidents.
"History can't afford the prosecution of a former First Lady and two former presidents."
The hell it can't! If they're criminals, jail them. We are supposed to be a country of laws. We will do more harm by letting the powerful subvert the law with impunity.
Semper Fi
Mikeyavelli wrote:
They are slippery cons the democrats. They are already blaming the Russians and saying that the information is f**e.
Gotta give those democrats credit, they stick together and all lie in unison.
I'm sure that some republicans will side with obama and hilliar and the media and the democrats. They might think that this is too big to prosecute. History can't afford the prosecution of a former First Lady and two former presidents.
If they can impeach one and force another to resign, they can sure as 'ell prosecute the malefactors.
PoppaGringo wrote:
If they can impeach one and force another to resign, they can sure as 'ell prosecute the malefactors.
But they won't, they are either involved or they are cowards.
I don't see many impassioned pleas in Congress to prosecute the obama Clinton cabal. It’s as if they are still in power, and I think they are. The layers of corruption are deep and wide.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
But they won't, they are either involved or they are cowards.
I don't see many impassioned pleas in Congress to prosecute the obama Clinton cabal. It’s as if they are still in power, and I think they are. The layers of corruption are deep and wide.
The way around throwing them in prison is what the President did for Arpaio, convict them and then pardon them. I prefer the prison solution but I doubt that America will ever throw a prior occupant of the White House in prison no matter what the crime.
Semper Fi
GmanTerry wrote:
The way around throwing them in prison is what the President did for Arpaio, convict them and then pardon them. I prefer the prison solution but I doubt that America will ever throw a prior occupant of the White House in prison no matter what the crime.
Semper Fi
GmanTerry: Arpaio was convicted of a minor crime which carried a small fine...Trump expunged the misdemeanor!
ldsuttonjr wrote:
GmanTerry: Arpaio was convicted of a minor crime which carried a small fine...Trump expunged the misdemeanor!
You are right, Arpaio was following federal law, but obama and hilliar are s*******s, treasonous, conspiritorial and heinous. Their lie support system is about to crumble.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
You are right, Arpaio was following federal law, but obama and hilliar are s*******s, treasonous, conspiritorial and heinous. Their lie support system is about to crumble.
All I can say is that Arpiao ran the jails as if 'innocent until proven guilty' doesn't exist anymore. Most of the inmates in the five, Maricopa County jails, are awaiting trial. They either can't afford bail or are held without bail. To treat them the same as the convicted inmates is not in keeping with the values promised in our Constitution. I am not a fan of Joe Arpaio for that reason. I applaud his immigration goals but not the way he ran the Maricopa County jails. If you are convicted, you deserve everything you get. If you are awaiting trial, you are innocent until proven guilty.
Semper Fi
GmanTerry wrote:
All I can say is that Arpiao ran the jails as if 'innocent until proven guilty' doesn't exist anymore. Most of the inmates in the five, Maricopa County jails, are awaiting trial. They either can't afford bail or are held without bail. To treat them the same as the convicted inmates is not in keeping with the values promised in our Constitution. I am not a fan of Joe Arpaio for that reason. I applaud his immigration goals but not the way he ran the Maricopa County jails. If you are convicted, you deserve everything you get. If you are awaiting trial, you are innocent until proven guilty.
Semper Fi
All I can say is that Arpiao ran the jails as if '... (
show quote)
Being held without bail is reserved for murderers. Unable to afford bail isn't the Sheriff's responsibility. It is the responsibility of the inmate's attorney to seek bail. He holds prisoners that LEO's have apprehended for various crimes.
PoppaGringo wrote:
Being held without bail is reserved for murderers. Unable to afford bail isn't the Sheriff's responsibility. It is the responsibility of the inmate's attorney to seek bail. He holds prisoners that LEO's have apprehended for various crimes.
Most inmates are awaiting trial. That is my point. And there really are people who can not afford bail. It's how they are treated that I disapprove of. I have known a couple.
Semper Fi
GmanTerry wrote:
Most inmates are awaiting trial. That is my point. And there really are people who can not afford bail. It's how they are treated that I disapprove of. I have known a couple.
Semper Fi
How are the inmates treated, or mistreated that is so upsetting to you?
PoppaGringo wrote:
How are the inmates treated, or mistreated that is so upsetting to you?
Yeah, they were wearing obama's favorite color, pink.
PoppaGringo wrote:
How are the inmates treated, or mistreated that is so upsetting to you?
Under Arpaio during 2006 he reduced visits from one hour a day to one hour a week. That included attorneys until the judges declared it unconstitutional to limit time with your attorney. He also stopped all letters and only allowed pre stamped postcards for communication. The 'green baloney wasn't a joke. Arpaio's kid married Basha's kid and so Basha's supermarket gave all their out of date produce to the jail because it was a tax write-off. Frequently the meat was spoiled and smelled bad. At the end of his stint as Sheriff he removed all meat from the diet. Everyone was forced to eat vegetarian crap. Look, I did like his immigration sweeps but he was 100% political and abused the inmates. If you are really interested in what Joe was like read the book, "Arpaio De Facto Lawman". It was written by one of his chief deputies. It's only four dollars as an ebook. When I worked for APS I had a discussion with some of the troops I worked with. We were all conservative Republicans and we all believed that you wouldn't be in jail if you weren't guilty. I served on the County Grand Jury for three months in 2009 thru 2010. I got to talk to lots of people including many prosecutors and cops. What you see on TV isn't the way real life works. Arpaio is a jerk. That's my opinion and I'm not trying to pick a fight. I v**ed for him several times... before I changed my mind.
https://www.amazon.com/Arpaio-Facto-Lawman-Brian-Sands-ebook/dp/B00PX9T5UO/ref=sr_1_sc_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1516855659&sr=8-1-spell&keywords=arpiao+defactoSemper Fi
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.