If Hillary Wins.. (Page 3): how?????

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

UncleJesse wrote:

I noticed you used the Ricko signature catch phrase but I don't think you did it intentionally (Good Luck America).

Certainly, America could do worse than Jeb or Hillary. I think either of them would be fine. There is also a tell about Wall St. and corporate America...they want a candidate that is going to be stable for the interventional-capitalistic economic system we live in.

how?????

TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon

UncleJesse wrote:

I hope she has the chance to recall some of those ... (show quote)

LOL, :lol:
Bush was vey funny with words. What was the gynecologists show their love for women one, that one was hilarious.
Nuke U lar.
Reagan was funnier though. . .

CDM Loc: Florida

Brian Devon wrote:

You mean Cuomo?

Yup.

Brian Devon

UncleJesse wrote:

Well go ahead and escalate. I was going to say th... (show quote)

I can tell you what I think. Its incredibly sad to read about the American people's gullibility and naiivity in supporting Hillary. She is little more than GW Bush in d**g.

1. She v**ed for the Iraq War.

2. She has refused to support an international treaty banning land mines.

3. She opposes restrictions on U.S. arms t***sfers to foreign governments that engage in systematic human rights abuses such as: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan.

If you would like to learn more read "Foreign Policy in Focus (Dec. 10, 2007).

Hillary showed her true colors, recently, enflaming an already tense Crimean situation, by referring to Putin as another Hitler.

She is little more than a war criminal-in-the-making. My wife and I detest her. There are vastly kinder, more intelligent, more compassionate women that the Democrats could choose from. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts comes to mind. Hillary is just plain evil. Who in hell wants Bill Clinton 2.0???

Who in hell really wants Bush 3.0? Who in hell wants to further political crime families???

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

Brian Devon wrote:

I can tell you what I think. Its incredibly sad to... (show quote)

sounds like your beloved obozo

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

I find a ring of t***h in what you wrote but I think the foreign policy positions is probably what puts her in the lead. I know it doesn't make intuitive sense, but she knows what political rhetoric to say to make the opponent look weak on defense and strategy. Main street usually likes the moderate candidate with hawk speech. She also knows how to flip-flop with savvy if the speech is seen as too hard. I kind of think Mr. Obama will endorse Biden so, I'm not sure if she'll win the nomination or if there is another moderate the democrats will support.

Brian Devon wrote:

I can tell you what I think. Its incredibly sad to... (show quote)

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

I find it refreshing that she is not so liberal as to ignore Goldman Sachs, Carlye Group and other investment firms.

Remember, her daughter worked at a hedge fund and her son in law co-owns another. I think this gives them a unique perspective of the financial business industry. I'm not saying it is an altruistic perspective but it is a practical perspective.

Brian Devon wrote:

No, the Clintons, Bushes, Wall St, and corporate A... (show quote)

Brian Devon

UncleJesse wrote:

I find it refreshing that she is not so liberal as to ignore Goldman Sachs, Carlye Group and other investment firms.

Remember, her daughter worked at a hedge fund and her son in law co-owns another. I think this gives them a unique perspective of the financial business industry. I'm not saying it is an altruistic perspective but it is a practical perspective.

Refreshing??? The Clintons are now worth over $100 million. Apparently they are quite the experts at investing Bill's p**********l pension.

No, Hillary and Bill are both Machiavellian pigs. The "screwing" from Bill, had nothing to do with Monica Lewinsky. It had everything to do with NAFTA and the repeal of Glass-Steagal.

You seem to rejoice in Hillary's Machiavellian outlook. You use calm reasonable language but you actually sound like a hedge fund style sick "f*ck".

:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

CDM Loc: Florida

Brian Devon wrote:

I can tell you what I think. Its incredibly sad to... (show quote)

Is this the same Elizabeth Warren that is 35 parts per million native American? Or was that 35 %? Oh, I get so confused; all these redskins look the same to me...

Brian Devon

CDM wrote:

Is this the same Elizabeth Warren that is 35 parts per million native American? Or was that 35 %? Oh, I get so confused; all these redskins look the same to me...

I am very aware of Senator Warren's Native-American "baqgage". She said she acknowledged that ancestry based on what she had been told by her family. Do most of us doubt our parents when they tell us our family history?

Bottom line: It is a small potatoes issue. If she exaggerated her background she would just be one of thousands of politicos do do such a thing.

It is definitely small potatoes when compared to Hillary's "It Takes a Village to Bury a Child". Hillary is a war pimp.
How much more callous can a human being be than to oppose international laws outlawing land mines?

Maybe it is because it is not her children stepping on them, losing their arms,legs, eyes, or life.

Elizabeth Warren has the guts to stand up to the Wall St. Banksters. Hillary would much rather shill for Goldman Sachs at $200,000 per speech.

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

I don't agree with that. Maybe you are too easily influenced by medieval novels or the bard's dramas. To me, your view requires no evidence and includes much passion.

Free trade has increased the overall economy in all countries involved with NAFTA. Protecting certain jobs that couldn't compete without subsidies and tariffs helps a few folks but more citizens benefit when free trade is allowed to flourish. I don't see much problem with updating and replacing the 66 year old GSA with GLBA 15 years ago. I guess you'd prefer there to be no financial services industry and carry bits of gold around for trading? It employs over six million citizens and contributes about 8% of GDP. If it is going to grow globally, why not ensure the US sector is promoted and increase our GDP instead of allowing London, Singapore, Tokoyo, Zurich and Seoul to grab a bigger market share?

Brian Devon wrote:

Refreshing??? The Clintons are now worth over $100... (show quote)

Brian Devon

UncleJesse wrote:

I don't agree with that. Maybe you are too easily... (show quote)

You are really a fan of dispassionate financial Machiavellianism aren't you???

Some of us are not...and are beginning to get ready to slow down your Hillary-war pimp-Wall St. bribe-taking juggernaut.

We really don't want a president whose political designation is D-Goldman Sachs.

I hope and pray either Senator Warren or Gov Dean throw their hat into the race and we don't have to have this modern day Madame Nhu as our new Queen.

Google: Madam Nhu, Vietnam, D**gon Lady

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

I'm sure you believe in political strategy and I wonder if you thought how well the slogan, "dispassionate financial Machiavellianism" does in the straw polls?

Currently, Warren and Dean are far from moderate to be considered seriously. History has shown that Hillary probably will be overplayed anyway by the time nomination races begin to be counted and some fresh unknown moderate will be nominated instead. Who will get the republican nomination?

Brian Devon wrote:

You are really a fan of dispassionate financial Ma... (show quote)

Brian Devon

UncleJesse wrote:

I'm sure you believe in political strategy and I wonder if you thought how well the slogan, "dispassionate financial Machiavellianism" does in the straw polls?

Currently, Warren and Dean are far from moderate to be considered seriously. History has shown that Hillary probably will be overplayed anyway by the time nomination races begin to be counted and some fresh unknown moderate will be nominated instead. Who will get the republican nomination?

I'm not conducting a poll, moron. Get lost.

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

You crack me up. I always get a good laugh reading your reply posts. I figured the question about the republican nominee might strike a nerve.

Brian Devon wrote:

I'm not conducting a poll, moron. Get lost.