"We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”: James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack"
- Richard Gardner in CFR publication - Foreign Affairs - April, 1974.

Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZB) formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1970’s, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter later became President, & ZB was made Carter's National Security Adviser.
“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ” (p.72) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the c*******t system.” (pp.146,147) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)

MS media & politicians tell Americans the danger is terrorism. Terrorists can't take away habeus corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. Terrorists can't suspend the constitutional government, or abolish the separation of powers. TERRORISM CANNOT PICK US UP, SHUT US UP, OR ARREST US. The threat of terrorism is nothing like the threat of our own government in the name of fighting terrorism.

UNDERSTAND- Both party leaderships had been partners in Int’l Globalism: Ron Paul went up against the snakes in the MSM; and his party shut The choices were NWO F*****m or Socialism but no Constitutionalism. The parties gave us no real conservative choice; no Populism. True liberty was not allowed by their NWO controllers. Both parties had been partners in subjugation to the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Bankers.

America is getting back to what it was designed as, and what made it the beacon of the Earth.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

eagleye13 wrote:

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack"
- Richard Gardner in CFR publication - Foreign Affairs - April, 1974.

Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZB) formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1970’s, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter later became President, & ZB was made Carter's National Security Adviser.
“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ” (p.72) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the c*******t system.” (pp.146,147) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)

MS media & politicians tell Americans the danger is terrorism. Terrorists can't take away habeus corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. Terrorists can't suspend the constitutional government, or abolish the separation of powers. TERRORISM CANNOT PICK US UP, SHUT US UP, OR ARREST US. The threat of terrorism is nothing like the threat of our own government in the name of fighting terrorism.

UNDERSTAND- Both party leaderships had been partners in Int’l Globalism: Ron Paul went up against the snakes in the MSM; and his party shut The choices were NWO F*****m or Socialism but no Constitutionalism. The parties gave us no real conservative choice; no Populism. True liberty was not allowed by their NWO controllers. Both parties had been partners in subjugation to the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Bankers.

America is getting back to what it was designed as, and what made it the beacon of the Earth.

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member o... (show quote)

There is a video on you tube of Bush Sr. Saying the same thing,”Make no mistake we will have one world government weather or not you like it”

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

There is a lot everyone can do to throw a monkey wrench
into the global elites/NWO plans.

kankune Loc: Iowa

11r20 wrote:

There is a lot everyone can do to throw a monkey wrench
into the global elites/NWO plans.

And we will throw everything into it and at it that we can. I for one will not settle for a one world government!!

Manning345 Loc: Richmond, Virginia

eagleye13 wrote:

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack"
- Richard Gardner in CFR publication - Foreign Affairs - April, 1974.

Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZB) formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1970’s, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter later became President, & ZB was made Carter's National Security Adviser.
“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ” (p.72) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the c*******t system.” (pp.146,147) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)

MS media & politicians tell Americans the danger is terrorism. Terrorists can't take away habeus corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. Terrorists can't suspend the constitutional government, or abolish the separation of powers. TERRORISM CANNOT PICK US UP, SHUT US UP, OR ARREST US. The threat of terrorism is nothing like the threat of our own government in the name of fighting terrorism.

UNDERSTAND- Both party leaderships had been partners in Int’l Globalism: Ron Paul went up against the snakes in the MSM; and his party shut The choices were NWO F*****m or Socialism but no Constitutionalism. The parties gave us no real conservative choice; no Populism. True liberty was not allowed by their NWO controllers. Both parties had been partners in subjugation to the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Bankers.

America is getting back to what it was designed as, and what made it the beacon of the Earth.

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member o... (show quote)

There are a number of issues with the idea of global government, in my opinion:
1) I believe the majority of Americans are firmly for retaining our sovereignty;
2) It boggles my mind to understand what to do with the basket cases for nations. Would we be forced to lower our living standards in order to raise theirs ever so slightly?
3) Conflicts are on-going in various places. Would the WG create an international military force, not only to reduce the conflicts but also to enforce WG rulings, say, against the US? Would this force of necessity be able to take on the US, or Russia, or China?
4) What form would such a WG take? Is the UN a model for it? That is laughable! Or would it go for a constitutional form, or an oligarchy, or what? Rogue nations would still exist as they do now, unless the WG took military action against them. Would we support such actions? Would the organizers attempt to install a form of socialism or c*******m. This would not sit well with Americans. Some 65 or so nations are Islamic out of the 190 or so in existence, and many others are either kingships or strongman governments that in a democratic form of world government would have a large say in how things go. They might even make up a majority, together with hangers on. That is not acceptable.
5) Would the WG have d******n over the seas and the underwater landscape? How would that affect the US? Mining rights in the oceans will become a significant element for all of us. How would that be favorable to the US?
6) Would the WG have d******n over the airspaces? Would they require us to submit to their management of the airspaces too?
7) What about space itself? How would that be managed?
8) What sort of freedom and liberty for people would this WG support, and defend?
9) Would the WG have the right to apportion our natural resources as they deem necessary? Our human resources? Our Businesses?
10) How would our laws be affected versus international law?

There are more objections that I have not yet thought through.

I V**E NO TO THE PROPOSITION!

glibona Loc: Nevada

Nor will I. Help clean out the Swamp through conventionofstates.com Article 5. - or best hope to reign in the government, retain our sovereignty and reject a one world order of government. ..help President Trump to make America Great Again.
Sign the COS petition, volunteer and be a part of the solution.

Betta

Bush senior is also a member of the p*******e ring embedded in our government. Saw a series of videos exposing this insideous cancer. A woman who survived it was forced to attend sick p*******e parties when she was a young girl. She said Bush senior was one of the attendees to these sick parties. She saw him there.

Hemiman wrote:

There is a video on you tube of Bush Sr. Saying the same thing,”Make no mistake we will have one world government weather or not you like it”

Texas Truth Loc: Behind Enemy Lines

11r20 wrote:

There is a lot everyone can do to throw a monkey wrench
into the global elites/NWO plans.

That monkey wrench May consist of a constitutional rectalopathy that will be the American people leaving the world government with a massive dick hole were their ass used to live. And where is Henry Kissinger today? We all know he has a manhole for an office door. I think that guy is older than c*******m itself. Time to put them on a a slow boat with a fast leak.

Texas Truth Loc: Behind Enemy Lines

Manning345 wrote:

There are a number of issues with the idea of global government, in my opinion:
1) I believe the majority of Americans are firmly for retaining our sovereignty;
2) It boggles my mind to understand what to do with the basket cases for nations. Would we be forced to lower our living standards in order to raise theirs ever so slightly?
3) Conflicts are on-going in various places. Would the WG create an international military force, not only to reduce the conflicts but also to enforce WG rulings, say, against the US? Would this force of necessity be able to take on the US, or Russia, or China?
4) What form would such a WG take? Is the UN a model for it? That is laughable! Or would it go for a constitutional form, or an oligarchy, or what? Rogue nations would still exist as they do now, unless the WG took military action against them. Would we support such actions? Would the organizers attempt to install a form of socialism or c*******m. This would not sit well with Americans. Some 65 or so nations are Islamic out of the 190 or so in existence, and many others are either kingships or strongman governments that in a democratic form of world government would have a large say in how things go. They might even make up a majority, together with hangers on. That is not acceptable.
5) Would the WG have d******n over the seas and the underwater landscape? How would that affect the US? Mining rights in the oceans will become a significant element for all of us. How would that be favorable to the US?
6) Would the WG have d******n over the airspaces? Would they require us to submit to their management of the airspaces too?
7) What about space itself? How would that be managed?
8) What sort of freedom and liberty for people would this WG support, and defend?
9) Would the WG have the right to apportion our natural resources as they deem necessary? Our human resources? Our Businesses?
10) How would our laws be affected versus international law?

There are more objections that I have not yet thought through.

I V**E NO TO THE PROPOSITION!

There are a number of issues with the idea of glob... (show quote)

Always remember we are Americans first! And we abide by this oath, we the willing led by the Unknowing have been doing so much for so long with so little that we are now overqualified to do anything with nothing and have enough Parts left over to build a horse out of horses**t.
Author unknown...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Manning345 wrote:

There are a number of issues with the idea of global government, in my opinion:
1) I believe the majority of Americans are firmly for retaining our sovereignty;
2) It boggles my mind to understand what to do with the basket cases for nations. Would we be forced to lower our living standards in order to raise theirs ever so slightly?
3) Conflicts are on-going in various places. Would the WG create an international military force, not only to reduce the conflicts but also to enforce WG rulings, say, against the US? Would this force of necessity be able to take on the US, or Russia, or China?
4) What form would such a WG take? Is the UN a model for it? That is laughable! Or would it go for a constitutional form, or an oligarchy, or what? Rogue nations would still exist as they do now, unless the WG took military action against them. Would we support such actions? Would the organizers attempt to install a form of socialism or c*******m. This would not sit well with Americans. Some 65 or so nations are Islamic out of the 190 or so in existence, and many others are either kingships or strongman governments that in a democratic form of world government would have a large say in how things go. They might even make up a majority, together with hangers on. That is not acceptable.
5) Would the WG have d******n over the seas and the underwater landscape? How would that affect the US? Mining rights in the oceans will become a significant element for all of us. How would that be favorable to the US?
6) Would the WG have d******n over the airspaces? Would they require us to submit to their management of the airspaces too?
7) What about space itself? How would that be managed?
8) What sort of freedom and liberty for people would this WG support, and defend?
9) Would the WG have the right to apportion our natural resources as they deem necessary? Our human resources? Our Businesses?
10) How would our laws be affected versus international law?

There are more objections that I have not yet thought through.

I V**E NO TO THE PROPOSITION!

There are a number of issues with the idea of glob... (show quote)

Manning you present many good concerns and questions, that a lot of Americans don't take the time to contemplate.

For answers; you would have to infiltrate the next Bilderberg meeting.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Betta wrote:

Bush senior is also a member of the p*******e ring embedded in our government. Saw a series of videos exposing this insideous cancer. A woman who survived it was forced to attend sick p*******e parties when she was a young girl. She said Bush senior was one of the attendees to these sick parties. She saw him there.

Pappa Bush was just another front man for the rotten Powers That Be. His boy was a stooge. At least Trump smacked Jeb down.

Big dog

eagleye13 wrote:

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack"
- Richard Gardner in CFR publication - Foreign Affairs - April, 1974.

Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZB) formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1970’s, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter later became President, & ZB was made Carter's National Security Adviser.
“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ” (p.72) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the c*******t system.” (pp.146,147) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)

MS media & politicians tell Americans the danger is terrorism. Terrorists can't take away habeus corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. Terrorists can't suspend the constitutional government, or abolish the separation of powers. TERRORISM CANNOT PICK US UP, SHUT US UP, OR ARREST US. The threat of terrorism is nothing like the threat of our own government in the name of fighting terrorism.

UNDERSTAND- Both party leaderships had been partners in Int’l Globalism: Ron Paul went up against the snakes in the MSM; and his party shut The choices were NWO F*****m or Socialism but no Constitutionalism. The parties gave us no real conservative choice; no Populism. True liberty was not allowed by their NWO controllers. Both parties had been partners in subjugation to the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Bankers.

America is getting back to what it was designed as, and what made it the beacon of the Earth.

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member o... (show quote)

There's a good chance that the WG could emerge, but only after a MAJOR catastrophe here on Earth, such as an asteroid strike, world nuclear war, major p******c, etc. We won't lose the technology that we have advanced, but we will have limited access to it. Only then could the human race be subjugated thoroughly.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Big dog wrote:

There's a good chance that the WG could emerge, but only after a MAJOR catastrophe here on Earth, such as an asteroid strike, world nuclear war, major p******c, etc. We won't lose the technology that we have advanced, but we will have limited access to it. Only then could the human race be subjugated thoroughly.

"There's a good chance that the WG could emerge, but only after a MAJOR catastrophe here on Earth...Only then could the human race be subjugated thoroughly."
I agree; but more people must be aware that there will always be those that try, and expose that. They depend on false premises and covert operations.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

glibona wrote:

Nor will I. Help clean out the Swamp through conventionofstates.com Article 5. - or best hope to reign in the government, retain our sovereignty and reject a one world order of government. ..help President Trump to make America Great Again.
Sign the COS petition, volunteer and be a part of the solution.

"Sign the COS petition, volunteer and be a part of the solution."
Do you have a link to post?

Texas Truth Loc: Behind Enemy Lines

[quote=Big dog]There's a good chance that the WG could emerge, but only after a MAJOR catastrophe here on Earth, such as an asteroid strike, world nuclear war, major p******c, etc. We won't lose the technology that we have advanced, but we will have limited access to it. Only then could the human race be subjugated thoroughly.[/

quote] good call