The Dutchman

Something the liberals just don’t understand

This very well done...and instructive.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10202500003368338

Patty

That was cute and very true.
Sad thing is no one on the left will watch it. These are the same people who when they are standing in the government rice line will be saying "Why didn't anyone tell us this would happen"

The Dutchman

Oh but they have been forewarned over, and over, and over again, and again and their replies are always: lies, lies, and more lies!

Patty

"Tactic Number One: Interruption



This one will be used often, throughout the span of an entire debate. If you, as a conservative (or even moderate), are attempting to make a point- especially if you have numbers, facts, and figures to back your point of view up- the common liberal will use this weapon often. Why? Because it stops you from getting your point across- and if you don’t get your point across, you cannot win a debate.



The liberal sees this, the liberal knows this, and thus the liberal will interrupt you often. If the liberal has no numbers, facts, or figures to prove their point with (a common occurrence), the liberal will use the interruption tactic even more. The interruption tactic can be used in combination with another rather strong tactic, bomb-throwing, which we cover next.



Tactic Number Two: Bomb-Throwing



This one is not used as much, as it tends to get offensive, but when it is used, it can lead a liberal to victory in a debate through nothing more than sheer shock-value. It is called “bomb-throwing,” and essentially it is the use of name calling, accusations, and vicious attacks to shut down the opposition. These attacks are usually not even true, but this does not matter- for the attacks are only designed to do three things:


•Shock the audience and perhaps paint you out to be evil and wrong
•Coerce you to change the subject by trying to defend yourself from these attacks (a natural human impulse on your part)
•Anger you and force you to lose your cool, and thus appear immature and unprofessional



Time and time again, liberals use this tactic, and it is effective, because conservatives are simply not ready for it. Conservatives are also generally more classy, relaxed, and well-mannered than their liberal counterparts, so they often do not know how to respond to such viciousness. This trend it starting to change as conservatives have “rebuilt their defenses,” but many still fall for this liberal trap of bomb-throwing.



Tactic Number Three: Raising the Volume



This is yet another tactic that is geared at conservatives in particular, and preys off the fact that conservatives are generally more classy, relaxed, and well-mannered people than liberals. This one makes use of another fact: conservatives are quieter people than liberals, and not anywhere near as fierce. Liberals realize this, and they use it to their advantage when it comes to debate.



Essentially, they raise the volume. They’ll yell, scream, talk aggressively, and be particularly fierce and provoking throughout the debate. They do this to anger their opposition and try to throw them off, and they also do it to try to weaken the conservative’s resolve. They also want to engage the opposition in a “shouting match,” as this plays to a liberal’s favor, since they already do it (and since it makes the audience think of the opposition badly). Additionally, this tactic serves another purpose: it motivates other liberals and gets them pumped up, to the point where they might even get involved in the debate (see tactic five).



Tactic Number Four: The Populist Bomb



This one is a tactic that seems to have been developed by one group of liberals to promote the growth of another; essentially, the “intellectual” left employs the Populist Bomb often to get people to join the droves of the “Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck” group. Of course, these said people do not realize they’re being d**gged into such a group, but the liberals know it, as they’re trying to get more people on their side.



So what is a Populist Bomb? It’s something known as “telling people what they want to hear.” It employs frequent use of the race card, the class card, and all sorts of other things that we covered earlier- the same very things that created the second group of liberals, the “Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck.” It frequently attacks Republicans and any other opposition for the “screwing over” of certain groups (even though these attacks are usually totally false), and it also makes excessive use of “spin.”"

http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm

The Dutchman

Great job Patty, There are a handful of them in here that do exactly all of it to every post they don't want exposed.....
You can really tell when the t***h hurts the parasites come out of the shadows. Seldom if ever do they initiate a new topic, all they do is jump in and try to distract with their moronic crap.

Patty

I have one who follows me closely here. I must really be striking a nerve.
;)

The Dutchman

When ever they post their crap I just ignore them and it appears to be really striking a nerve cause it just starts babbling about nothing....

Hungry Freaks

Yeah, patty, this is a real closet case you've come upon. He starts a half-dozen threads a day and refuses to engage in meaningful dialogue on any of them.

And his the forum homophobe, a deeply conflicted person who lashes out at exactly what he is. Just look at the avatar.

He runs from debate, so don't look for any answers.

rumitoid

Liberalism has been broadly interpreted. For may here, it seems to mean destroying the US through a creeping socialism and immorality. For others, and maybe along with the former, it means big government, a dependent populace, and greater taxes for most to support these bottom-feeders. Still others see it as not American at all but part of a global effort to make a One World Order, as per certain rules formerly laid and followed by carefully trained and educated "AlinsKy" acolytes. The dopey masses calling themselves "liberal" have drunk the koolaid and just ape the causes and policies dictated to them by the OWO patriarch**es. Is that accurate?

If you agree, look up "liberalism." Most of our advancement in power and wealth, the period that most seems to favor an American ideal of democracy, came from c*******t advancements in the treatment of labor, the development of unions, women's rights, the end of segregation, and so on. Communionism as practiced in the real world is ugly and deplorable but liberty would not know its greatest reach without it.

The Dutchman

Liberalism: destroying things that work......

Hungry Freaks

what would you know about work? and if liberalism destroys things that work, you have nothing to fear.

Harpooner1

Yes, and after all these tactics can't change the subject, it becomes that smug look of derision as if they are talking to a child. Leslie Marshall is good for this...Julian Epstein...They just can't be bothered to listen anything other than their own voice and their own views....Pathetic..

Patty

:thumbup: Our Founding Fathers sure knew what they were doing when they created a republic and understood how damaging a pure democracy would be. Unfortunately the people have become dependent on the government and v****g for free stuff has become the majority v**e. This to will end when the freebies end and they will.
Margaret Thatcher: "Socialist soon run out of other peoples money."

Buck Loc: Valparaiso,IN

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Patty, I would like to meet some of these "classy, relaxed and well mannered" conservatives. Can you tell me which forum they are members of?