Blade_Runner wrote:
Actually, the stage was set for the 2008 financial crisis during the Clinton administration. Ever hear of Dodd-Frank? Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac? Sub-prime loans? Are you aware that Dubya had nothing to do with all of that?
Ah, so it was all Billy Boys fault. So deregulation of the financial industry had zero to do with it? Do you think that when we passed the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealing the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 that might have gotten the ball rolling. Now granted, Billy Boy did sign it but I don't think the idea originated in his brain cells. Once the financial industry was deregulated that permitted banks to engage in hedge fund trading with derivatives. Banks then demanded more mortgages to support the profitable sale of these derivatives. They created interest-only loans that became affordable to subprime borrowers. In 2004, the Federal Reserve raised the fed funds rate just as the interest rates on these new mortgages reset.
Housing prices started falling as supply outpaced demand. That trapped homeowners who couldn't afford the payments, but couldn't sell their house. When the values of the derivatives crumbled, banks stopped lending to each other. That created the financial crisis that led to the Great Recession.
In 2000 the Commodity Futures Modernization Act exempted credit default swaps and other derivatives from regulations. This federal legislation overruled the state laws that had formerly prohibited this as gambling. It specifically exempted trading in energy derivatives. Who wrote and advocated for passage of both bills? Texas Senator Phil Gramm, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. He listened to lobbyists from energy company Enron. His wife, who had formerly held the post of Chairwoman of the Commodities Future Trading Commission, was an Enron board member. Enron was a major contributor to Senator Gramm’s campaigns.
Enron wanted to engage in derivatives trading using its online futures exchanges. Enron argued that foreign derivatives exchanges were giving overseas firms an unfair competitive advantage. Big banks had the resources to become sophisticated at the use of these complicated derivatives. The banks with the most complicated financial products made the most money. That enabled them to buy out smaller, safer banks. By 2008, many of these major banks became too big to fail.
The key to all of this is letting our financial institutions do wh**ever the hell they wanted to. You know--no regulations--the dream of every conservative in the Untied States. But yeah, you're right, Clinton fuked up too. Had he been a liberal Democrat instead of a tool for republicans he could have stopped the whole thing from happening. Of course, Monday morning quarterbacks are always right.
Oh, and I left something out. Our good friend GW cut taxes targeting the wealthy, of course, all coming off a record financial decade so business and the wealthy were awash in cash. So what do the wealthy do when they have loads of cash? No, they didn't create jobs--they poured fuel into the fire which all came tumbling down in 2008.
Now here's my question to you Blade. While the Obama years weren't the best for the little guy they were wonderful for the top 1%. In fact, the record wealth created during the 90's is nothing compared to what they have now. And did you hear that Trump is cutting taxes, again targeting the wealthiest amongst us, so the amount of cash they will have for fires is going to be mind boggling. Now throw in deregulation--a word every conservatives loath--and how is the stage not set for our greatest financial crisis yet?
Just some food for thought. Oh, and of course you conservatives will find a way to blame Obama for all of it. End of story...